Metode Analisis Perencanaan I (MAP I)
Analisis CLUSTER
Disusun oleh:
Fika Febi Novianti
(2018280030)
Dosen pengampu:
Zenal Mutaqin S.T, M.Si
FAKULTAS TEKNIK
PROGRAM STUDI PERENCANAAN WILAYAH DAN KOTA
UNIVERSITAS INDO GLOBAL MANDIRI
TAHUN AJARAN 2019/2020
Descriptives
Descriptive Statistics
N Minimum Maximum Mean Std. Deviation
Pendapatan 12 60.00 93.00 76.3333 10.62016
Pinjaman 12 40.00 89.00 69.7500 14.37248
dana_hibah 12 6.00 9.00 7.4167 1.16450
Konsumsi 12 53.00 90.00 75.2500 11.79464
Penduduk 12 24.00 67.00 44.9167 13.89217
Valid N (listwise) 12
Quick Cluster
Initial Cluster Centers
Cluster
1 2 3
Zscore(pendapatan) 1.28686 -.50219 -.59635
Zscore(dana_hibah) 1.35967 -1.21654 -.35781
Zscore(penduduk) 1.22971 -1.07375 -.85780
Zscore(pinjaman) .71317 .36528 -2.06993
Zscore(konsumsi) .74186 .91143 -1.29296
Iteration Historya
Change in Cluster Centers
Iteration 1 2 3
1 .892 1.172 1.092
2 .000 .000 .000
a. Convergence achieved due to no or small
change in cluster centers. The maximum
absolute coordinate change for any center is
,000. The current iteration is 2. The minimum
distance between initial centers is 3,403.
Final Cluster Centers
Cluster
1 2 3
Zscore(pendapatan) 1.09854 -.29504 -.97299
Zscore(dana_hibah) .50093 -.52955 .21468
Zscore(penduduk) 1.08574 -.49788 -.61785
Zscore(pinjaman) .74796 .15655 -1.25819
Zscore(konsumsi) .76306 .21620 -1.37774
ANOVA
Cluster Error
Mean Square df Mean Square df F Sig.
Zscore(pendapatan) 4.051 2 .322 9 12.584 .002
Zscore(dana_hibah) 1.272 2 .940 9 1.354 .306
Zscore(penduduk) 3.550 2 .433 9 8.192 .009
Zscore(pinjaman) 3.555 2 .432 9 8.223 .009
Zscore(konsumsi) 4.129 2 .305 9 13.548 .002
The F tests should be used only for descriptive purposes because the clusters have been chosen to
maximize the differences among cases in different clusters. The observed significance levels are not
corrected for this and thus cannot be interpreted as tests of the hypothesis that the cluster means are equal.
Number of Cases in each
Cluster
Cluster 1 4.000
2 5.000
3 3.000
Valid 12.000
Missing .000
Proximities
Case Processing Summarya
Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
12 100.0% 0 .0% 12 100.0%
a. Squared Euclidean Distance used
Cluster
Average Linkage (Between Groups)
Agglomeration Schedule
Cluster Combined Stage Cluster First Appears
Stage Cluster 1 Cluster 2 Coefficients Cluster 1 Cluster 2 Next Stage
1 9 10 .959 0 0 6
2 7 11 .974 0 0 6
3 4 5 2.188 0 0 5
4 6 8 3.288 0 0 7
5 3 4 4.038 0 3 9
6 7 9 4.152 2 1 8
7 2 6 4.250 0 4 9
8 7 12 6.891 6 0 11
9 2 3 7.159 7 5 10
10 1 2 10.490 0 9 11
11 1 7 13.270 10 8 0
Cluster Membership
Case 4 Clusters 3 Clusters 2 Clusters
1:A 1 1 1
2:B 2 2 1
3:C 3 2 1
4:D 3 2 1
5:E 3 2 1
6:F 2 2 1
7:G 4 3 2
8:H 2 2 1
9:I 4 3 2
10:J 4 3 2
11:K 4 3 2
12:L 4 3 2
Dendrogram
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * H I E R A R C H I C A L C L U S T E R A N
A L Y S I S * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Dendrogram using Average Linkage (Between Groups)
Rescaled Distance Cluster Combine
C A S E 0 5 10 15 20 25
Label Num +---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+
I 9 ─┬───────────┐
J 10 ─┘ ├───────────┐
G 7 ─┬───────────┘ ├───────────────────────┐
K 11 ─┘ │ │
L 12 ─────────────────────────┘ │
D 4 ─────┬───────┐ │
E 5 ─────┘ ├───────────┐ │
C 3 ─────────────┘ ├─────────────┐ │
F 6 ─────────┬───┐ │ │ │
H 8 ─────────┘ ├───────────┘ ├─────────┘
B 2 ─────────────┘ │
A 1 ───────────────────────────────────────┘
