Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to www.scribd.com

Scribd
Upload
16K views1 page

Content Validity Form

This document is a content validity form used to evaluate a questionnaire for a study on automotive students' satisfaction rates in terms of material, trainers, and learning style. The form asks the evaluator to rate different aspects of the questionnaire on a scale of 1 to 5, with 1 being "Needs Improvement" and 5 being "Excellent." It evaluates the clarity, organization, suitability, adequacy, purpose fulfillment, and objectivity of the questionnaire items and directions. Space is also provided for overall remarks from the evaluator.

Uploaded by

Lyka Ramirez
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
16K views1 page

Content Validity Form

This document is a content validity form used to evaluate a questionnaire for a study on automotive students' satisfaction rates in terms of material, trainers, and learning style. The form asks the evaluator to rate different aspects of the questionnaire on a scale of 1 to 5, with 1 being "Needs Improvement" and 5 being "Excellent." It evaluates the clarity, organization, suitability, adequacy, purpose fulfillment, and objectivity of the questionnaire items and directions. Space is also provided for overall remarks from the evaluator.

Uploaded by

Lyka Ramirez
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

CONTENT VALIDITY FORM

AUTOMOTIVE STUDENTS SATISFACTORY RATE IN TERMS OF MATERIAL,


TRAINERS AND LEARNING STYLE

Direction: This tool asks for your evaluation of the questionnaire to be used in the data
gathering for investigation stated above, to establish its validity. You are requested to
give your honest assessment using the criteria stated below, please check (✓) only
one from the selection.
Point Equivalent:
1- Needs Improvement 2-Fair 3-Good 4-Very Good 5-Excellent

1 2 3 4 5
Clarity of the Directions and Items
The vocabulary level, language structure and
1 conceptual level of the questions suit the level of
respondents. The questionnaire directions and items are
written in a clear and understandable manner.
Organization and Presentation of Items
2 The items are organized and presented in logical and
sequential manner.
Suitability of Items
The items appropriately represent the substance of the
3 first phase of a study. The questions are designed to
determine the conditions, knowledge, perceptions, and
attitudes that are supposed to be measured.
Adequateness of Items per Category an Indicator
The items represent the coverage of the first phase of
the study adequately. The number of questions per
4 indicator and category is representative enough of the
concept defined for the first phase of the particular study.

Attainment of Purpose
5 The instrument as a whole fulfils the objective for which
it was constructed.
Objectivity
Each item/question requires only answers or measures
6 of only one category of behaviours and no aspect of the
questionnaire suggests bias (such as gender stereotyped,
etc.) on the part of the study

Overall Remarks: _______________________________________________________


______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________

Signature over Printed Name of Evaluator Date of Evaluation

You might also like