IB Professional Development Guide
IB Professional Development Guide
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT
FOR A CHANGING WORLD
LEARNING THAT EMPHASIZES
ASKING, THINKING AND DOING
What does it mean to be an effective, internationally minded International Baccalaureate (IB) educator
and leader in today’s world? IB Professional Development answers this question through lifelong
learning opportunities that reflect the culture and purpose of IB, delivered in a distinctive IB environment.
From asking the right questions to engaging with complex Dynamic ecosystems of global
global challenges, IB uses constructivist inquiry to prepare
peer collaboration
students to build a better world.
Highly experienced IB educators and leaders design, develop
IB applies this same approach of questioning, reflecting and and deliver professional learning experiences for their peers.
doing to all professional learning experiences. Through open These facilitators are members of the IB Educator Network
communication and action-oriented inquiry, IB builds on (IBEN) and come from a worldwide professional learning
educators’ knowledge and shares best practices across diverse community of internationally minded educators, school leaders
experiences. Educators and administrators who complete IB and administrators. English, Spanish and French are the core
professional development are even more prepared to apply languages of IB instruction, with workshops and other learning
their skills in any cultural or school context, weave issues of experiences delivered in schools’ languages of instruction,
significance into their work and care for the whole student in such as Mandarin, Arabic, Turkish and Japanese. Extending the
a way that meets the unique needs of today’s students while network within the IB community, IB educator certificate pro-
reflecting IB philosophy. grams are offered through strong partnerships with a variety of
respected higher education institutions globally.
1
LEARNING THAT STRENGTHENS
EXPERTISE AND UNDERSTANDING
IB educators and leaders participate in IB’s practice-based 9 design values in every learning experience
lifelong learning for many reasons:
2
LEADING THROUGH QUALITY
AND CONSISTENCY
PROTOTYPE
LAUNCH
QUALITY
ASSURANCE
REVIEW
2
Derived from Guskey’s Professional Development Evaluation Model.
3
Workshop success at a glance Entry points for IB Professional
Development
8.5
• Face-to-face workshops – Offered around the world,
these workshops bring diverse groups of educators
together in multi-day learning events. These workshops
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
typically involve 15 hours of face-to-face sessions over
2.5 days.
Overall quality rating on the workshop
(scale of 1-10): 8.5
• Online workshops – Delivered via a high-quality
learning platform, these workshops expand access for
educators from all over the world to an unparalleled
8.3
exchange of knowledge. Workshops typically last four
weeks and require approximately 16 learning hours.
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
4
IB educator and leadership
certificates
Category 3: In-depth investigations. Educators explore guided IB advanced certificate in teaching and learning
professional inquiry, specialization and educational research, research: Prepares educators for the rigorous inves-
ideas and trends. tigative work involved in advancing their school’s
curriculum development, pedagogy and assessment.
IB education workshops: Whether across IB programmes or
with a singular focus, educators examine the question: “What is IB certificate in leadership practice: Develops
an IB education?” These provocative learning experiences present educators and administrators who guide a school
challenging ideas around the IB mission to make the world a through IB authorization, implementation and
better place through education. beyond.
IB leadership workshops: Educators learn essentials of leading IB advanced certificate in leadership research:
across cultures and contexts and how to navigate the complex Empowers educators and administrators with deep
international education arena. They emerge adaptable and ready capacities in rigorous investigative work and a pro-
to thrive as a leader, wherever they go. found understanding of IB leadership responsibilities
and capabilities.
TAKE THE NEXT STEP TO TRANSFORM YOUR LEARNING, TEACHING AND LEADING.
ibo.org/pd-options
5
Bibliography
Anderson, S, Louis, K and Wahlstrom, K. 2004. How leadership influences Hattie, J. 2015. “The Applicability of Visible Learning to Higher Education”.
student learning: A review of research for the learning innovation, change Visible Learning.
and improvement from Leadership Project. New York, NY. The Wallace Hertzman, C, Irwin, L and Siddiqi, A. 2007. “Early Child Development: A
Foundation. Powerful Equalizer”. World Health Organization. Pp. 15.
Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership (AITSL). 2014. Jenkins, H. 2006. “Confronting the Challenges of Participatory Culture:
Global trends in professional learning and performance & development. Media Education for the 21st Century”.
Barr, M and Tschannen-Moran, M. 2004. “Fostering student learning: The Kalantzis, M and Cope, B. 2012. New Learning: Elements of a Science of
relationship of collective teacher efficacy and student achievement”. Education (Edn 2). Cambridge, UK. Cambridge University Press.
Leadership and Policy in Schools Vol 3:3. Pp 190. Kunter et al. 2013. In Guerriero, S. (ed.). 2017. Pedagogical Knowledge and
Behrenbruch, M and Dean, M. 2012. “Peer-to-Peer professional develop- the Changing Nature of the Teaching Profession. Paris, France. OECD
ment: Implications for an effective workshop leader from the Interna- Publishing. Accessed at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264270695-en.
tional Baccalaureate’s quality assurance research project”. Proceedings Leithwood, K. et al. 2009. “Seven strong claims about successful school
of the Canadian International Conference on Education, Guelph. leadership”. Nottingham, UK. National College of School Leadership.
Bergeron, L and Dean, M. 2013. The IB Teacher Professional: Identifying, Lloyd, C, Robinson, V and Rowe, K. 2008. “The Impact of Leadership on
measuring and characterizing pedagogical attributes, perspectives, Student Outcomes: An Analysis of the Differential Effects of Leader-
and beliefs. Bethesda, Maryland, USA. International Baccalaureate ship Types”. Educational Administration Quarterly. Vol. 44, number 5.
Organization. Louis, K.L., Leithwood, K, Wahlstrom, K.L. and Anderson, S.E. 2010. “Learn-
Brown, J. 2015. “Cultivating the Entrepreneurial Learner for the 21st Century”. ing from Leadership: Investigating the Links to Improved Student
Digital Media and Learning Conference. San Francisco, CA. Learning: Final Report of Research to The Wallace Foundation”.
Cochran-Smith, M and Lytle, S. 1999. “Relationship of knowledge and University of Minnesota and University of Toronto.
practice: Teacher learning in communities”. In A. Iran-Nejad & C. D. Marshall, H. 2011. “Education for global citizenship: Reflecting upon
Pearson (Eds.), Review of Research in Education (Vol. 24, Pp. 249–306). the instrumentalist agendas at play”. In Bates, R. (Ed.), Schooling
Washington, DC. American Educational Research Association. Internationally: globalisation, internationalisation and the future for
Darling-Hammond, L. 2017. Empowered Educators: How High Performing international schools. London. Routledge.
Systems Shape Teaching Quality around the World. San Francisco, CA. McKinsey & Company. 2007. “How the world’s best-performing school
Jossey-Bass. systems come out on top”.
Dean, M, Tait, A and Kim, G. 2012. Evaluating professional development Qian, H and Walker, A. 2011. “Leadership for learning in China: The
of educators in an international context. In The International Journal political and policy context”. In Townsend, T and MacBeath, J (eds.).
of Learning (Vol. 18, Issue 9, Pp. 161-179). Champaign, IL. Common 2011. International Handbook of Leadership for Learning. Netherlands.
Ground Publishing, LLC. Springer Publications.
Dinham, S. 2013. “The quality teaching movement in Australia encounters Rand Corporation. 2012. “Teachers Matter: Understanding teachers’
difficult terrain: A personal perspective”. Australian Journal of Education. impact on student achievement”. Santa Monica, CA.
Vol. 57, No. 2. Pp 91–106. Robinson, V. 2011. Student Centred Leadership. San Francisco, CA. Jossey-
Dorfman, P, Javidan, M, Hanges, P, Ali Dastmalchian, A. and House, R. 2012. Bass.
“GLOBE: A twenty year journey into the intriguing world of culture and Tully, J. 2007. “Two meanings of global citizenship: Modern and diverse”.
leadership”. Journal of World Business. No. 47. Pp 504-518. In Peters et al. (Ed.) Global citizenship education: Philosophy, theory
Dubner, S. 2017. “Earth 2.0: What would our economy look like?” Freako- and pedagogy. Rotterdam. Sense.
nomics Radio. Season 6, episode 37. Williams, J. 2016. “Trends in Professional Development for Globally Mind-
Editorial Projects in Education. 2011. “Improving Student Learning by ed Educators”. Edweek.org.
Supporting Quality Teaching: Key Issues, Effective Strategies”.
Bethesda, MD.
Fullan, M. 2011. “Choosing the wrong drivers for whole system reform”.
Centre for Strategic Education. Accessed at: https://www.schoolclimate.
org/climate/documents/policy/school-reform-drivers.pdf.
Goldring, E. et al. 2009. “Assessing learning-centered leadership: Con-
nections to research, professional standards and current practices”.
Leadership and policy in schools. Vol 8, number 1. Pp. 1-36.
Guskey, T. 2000. Evaluating professional development, Thousand Oaks, CA.
Corwin.
Hargreaves, D. 1998. “Creative professionalism: The role of teachers in the
knowledge society”. Arguments 22. Demos. 1-898309-79-5.
Hattie, J. 2003. “Teachers make a difference: What is the research
evidence?” Australian Council for Educational Research. Accessed May
2012 from https://www.det.nsw. edu.au/proflearn/docs/pdf/qt_hattie.pdf.
© International Baccalaureate Organization 2020
International Baccalaureate ® | Baccalauréat International ® | Bachillerato Internacional ®