Response to Reviewers
Manuscript ID: ICFAMMT24_106_50_977
Title of the paper- Smart Prosthetic Hand Empowered by AI, IoT, and Innovative
Material Selection.
We want to express our sincere gratitude to the Editor and the Reviewers. We have
addressed all the comments of the reviewers with our best efforts. We have revised the
manuscript as per the comments provided by the reviewer.
We, as the authors, sincerely acknowledge and are thankful to Reviewer-1. We honestly
feel that his/her insightful suggestions helped us in improving the manuscript and our
thoughts.
Reviewer’s original comments are listed below (in italics) followed
by our response to each comment.
Comment 1: The novelty of the work needs to be brought out by mentioning the theoretical
methods used for material selection (e.g., MCDM, TOPSIS, etc.)
Explanation: We, the authors agree with the reviewer’s suggestion. We have
incorporated the theoretical methods used for material selection in the revised manuscript
in the following pages.
We herein adopted the Analytic Hierarchy Method (AHP), a Multi-Criteria Decision-Making
(MCDM) procedure that incorporates the mechanical properties of each material and
determines the ratio for prosthetic hand fabrication. This multifaceted strategy enables an
enhanced comprehension of material efficacy in a broad range of applications. (On page 1)
In advanced prosthetics, the incorporation of Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) is a
critical component in creating a smart prosthetic hand driven by AI, IoT, and novel material
choices. MCDM is a complex decision-making technique that allows for a comprehensive
assessment of multiple factors essential for the optimal operation of the prosthetic hand [1].
Finally, using MCDM to create a Smart Prosthetic Hand represents a significant step toward
individualized, high-performance prosthetics. The smart prosthetic hand accomplishes a
harmonic integration of cutting-edge technology by leveraging this advanced decision-
making technique in material selection, leading to a device that is functionally superior
and ideally suited to its user's individual requirements and preferences [2]. (On page 2)
The incorporation of multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) into the development of a
smart prosthetic hand powered by AI, IoT, and Innovative Material Selection necessitates the
establishment of certain objectives that guide the analysis and execution process, including
Optimization of material selection, boost AI-powered prosthetic hand functions, utilize IoT
for communication and integrating data, maximize power usage, energy efficiency, and
behavior Trials with users and performance assessment. (On page 2-3)
1. Sensor Module: This module contains sensors (for example, EMG sensors and
accelerometers) that collect data on muscle signals, hand movements, and
environmental conditions. It communicates with the central processing unit to send
real-time sensor data. (On page 4)
2. Material Selection Module: MCDM techniques are used to analyze and select
materials for the prosthetic hand based on given criteria (e.g., mechanical
characteristics, biocompatibility). Interfaces with the CPU to make material
selection recommendations. (On page 4)
3. Central Processing Unit (CPU): Acts as the prosthetic hand system's brain,
processing sensor data, performing AI algorithms, and coordinating communication
between various components. (On page 4)
4. Artificial Intelligence (AI) Module: Machine learning algorithms are used to
understand sensor data, adjust the behavior of the prosthetic hand, and optimize
grip patterns based on human intent and environmental context. Data from the
sensor module is received, processed, and communicated with the CPU to effect
motor control. Algorithms, such as convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and
recurrent neural networks (RNNs), in analyzing medical images and time-series
data, respectively. (On page 4)
5. Internet of Things (IoT) Communication Module: The smart prosthetic hand can
communicate with external devices or networks for data sharing, remote
monitoring, and software updates. Interfaces with the CPU to send and receive data,
guaranteeing connectivity with the rest of the IoT ecosystem. Bluetooth technology
in IoT facilitates seamless communication between devices, enabling efficient data
exchange over short distances. In healthcare, Bluetooth monitors and transmits vital
signs from wearable devices to healthcare systems, enhancing patient care. (On
page 4)
6. User Interface (UI) and Feedback Module: Users can engage with the prosthetic
hand by providing feedback on preferences, initiating control commands, and
receiving system status reports. Connects to the CPU to relay user input and receive
response, making the experience more tailored and user-friendly. (On page 4)
This system architecture establishes a unified and intelligent foundation for the Smart
Prosthetic Hand, ensuring the seamless integration of AI, IoT, and MCDM-based material
selection to give a personalized, adaptive, and user-friendly prosthetic experience. (On page
5)
In conclusion, this integrated system design leverages the characteristics of MCDM,
AI, IoT, and material selection to build a Smart Prosthetic Hand that prioritizes user
happiness, adaptability, and comfort in addition to functional requirements.
The convergence of these technologies represents a huge step forward in the field of prosthetics,
offering a future in which mechanical limbs seamlessly interact with the user's intent and the
surrounding environment, thereby improving the quality of life for people who have lost limbs.
(On page 8)
Comment 2: What are the desired activities that an amputee can carry out post-
rehabilitation and their benchmarks?
Explanation: The desired activities that an amputee can carry out post-rehabilitation and their
benchmarks are added in the revised manuscript as follows:
Finally, the amputees can participate in a range of activities following rehabilitation that add to their
general well-being and quality of life. Specific activities and benchmarks may differ depending on
criteria such as amputation level, individual abilities, and type of prosthetic device utilized.
Following are some general tasks and benchmarks for amputees to strive for after rehabilitation,
including walking freely in various terrains, including rough terrain and stairs, cooking, cleaning,
and self-care are examples of independent daily living activities. Performing job-related tasks
effectively with the appropriate accommodations. Obtaining a level of freedom that corresponds to
personal goals and lifestyle requirements. It should be noted that benchmarks will differ from person
to person, and the emphasis should be on individual aims and desires. (On page 7-8)
Comment 3: Arduino UNO cannot be used for practical application, the motor shown in
the image is servo motor and the functions mentioned in the content are also of servo
motors but stepper motor is mentioned thought.
Explanation: we appreciate the reviewer’s feedback regarding the use of Arduino UNO
and the motor type mentioned. I understand your concern about the practical application
of Arduino UNO and the apparent discrepancy between the motor shown in the image
and the functions described in the content. We have corrected the following issues with
schematic diagrams in the revised manuscript.
Fig 1. Proposed System Architecture using Sensor and Microcontroller in Prosthetic
hand. (On page 3)
Fig 4. Prosthetic hand model (On page 7)
References
[1]. Belton, V., & Stewart, T. (2002). Multiple criteria decision analysis: an integrated
approach. Springer Science & Business Media.
[2]. Resnik, L., Meucci, M. R., Lieberman-Klinger, S., Fantini, C., Kelty, D. L., Disla,
R., & Sasson, N. (2012). Advanced upper limb prosthetic devices: implications for
upper limb prosthetic rehabilitation. Archives of physical medicine and
rehabilitation, 93(4), 710-717.
