Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to www.scribd.com

0% found this document useful (0 votes)
20 views24 pages

Data Sheets

Uploaded by

alaa Alobeidyeen
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
20 views24 pages

Data Sheets

Uploaded by

alaa Alobeidyeen
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 24

Determination of Water Content

Description ofsoil _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Sample No. _ _ __

Location _ _ _ _--'-_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _- - - - - - _ - , -

Tested by _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Date _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

Can No.

Mass of can, WI (g)

Mass of can + wet soil, W2 (g)

Mass of can + dry soil, W3 (g)

Mass of moisture, W2 - W3 (g)

Mass of dry soil, W3 - WI (g)

W2 - W3
Moisture content, W (%) = x 100
W3 -WI

Average moisture content, w_ _ _ _ %

153
Specific Gravity of Soil Solids
Description ofsoil,~_~_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Specimen No.~_ _

. Volume of flask at 20'C _ _ ml temperature of test _ _~_'C


A,_=-:-:-::-=:-
(Table 3-2)
Location, _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _'--_~_ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

Tested by _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Date.'--~_~ _ _ __

!
I Volumetric flask No.

Mass of flask + water filled to mark, WI (g)

Mass of flask + soil + water filled to mark,


W2 (g)

Mass of dry soil, Ws (g)

Mass of equal volume of water as the soil


solids, Ww (g) = (WI + Ws ) - Wz

Average Gs _ _ _- - - - - - - -

155
Sieve Analysis
Description of soil _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Sample No. _ _ __

Mass of oven dry sample, W g

Location _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

Tested by _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date._ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

boo 1.10

Pan
9--(') 0

_ _ _ _ =W,

W - W,
Mass loss during sieve analysis =. x 100 =____ % (OK iflessthan 2%)
W

157
Shrinkage Limit Test
Description of soil _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _~------ Sample No. --'..'_ _

Location _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

Tested by _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Date _ _ _ _ _ _ __

Mass of coated shrinkage limit dish, WI (g)

Mass of dish + wet soil, W2 (g)

Mass of dish + dry soil, W3 (g)

Mass of mercury to fill the dish, W4 (g)

Mass of mercury displaced by soil pat, Ws (g)

~w;(%)= (~-W,) xlOO


(13.6)(W, - IT';)

SL=w- (~-W,) xlOO


, (13.6)(W, - IT';)

165
Constant Head Permeability Test
Determination of Void Ratio of Specimen
Description ofsoil _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Sample No. _ _ _ __

Location _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

Length of specimen, L _ _ _ _ _ _ _c,m Diameter of specimen, D _ _ _ _ _,cm

Tested by _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Date,_ _ _ _ _- - - - - -

Volume of specimen, V= 1t D2L(cm 2)


4

Specific gravity of soil solids, G,

Mass of specimen tube with fittings, WI (g)

Mass of tube with fittings and specimen, W2 (g)

Dry density of specimen, Pd = W2 - If; (g / cm 3 )


V

V'd . 0f
OJ ratIO '
specImen, e =,--
G,pw - 1
Pd
(Note: Pw ~ 1 glcm3)

167
Constant Head Permeability Test
Determination of Coefficient of Permeability

Test No. 1 2 3

Average flow, Q (cm3)


.

Time of collection, t (s)

Temperature of water, T (Oe)

Head difference, h (cm)

Diameter of specimen, D (cm)

Length of specimen, L (cm)


.

Area of specimen, A = 1t D2 (cm 2 )


4

k=QL (cm/s)
Aht

Average k= emls

flr"c =
k20"C = kr"C-- = emfs
fl 2."c

169
Falling Head Permeability Test
II Determination of Void Ratio of Specimen

Description ofsoil _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Sample No. _ _ _ _ __

Location _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _- - - -

Length of specimen, L _ _ _ _ _ _ _,cm Diameter of specimen, 0 _ _ _-_cm

Tested by _~ _ _ _ _ ___'__~_ _ _ _ __ Date _ _ _ _ _ _ __

Volume of specimen, V = n D'L (cm')


4

Specific gravity of soil solids, Gs

Mass of specimen tube with fittings; WI (g)

Mass of tube with fittings and specimen, Wz (g)

Dry density of specimen, Pd = W, - W; (g / em 3 )


. V

Void ratio of specimen, e = G ,p w -1


Pd
(JVote: Pw = 1 glcm3)

171
Falling Head Permeability Test
Determination of Coefficient of Permeability

Test No. 1 2 3

Diameter of specimen, D (em)

Length of specimen, L (cm)

Area of specimen, A (cm2)

Beginning head difference, hI (em)

Ending head difference, h2 (cm)

Test duration, t (s)

Volume of water flow through the specimen, Vw (cm3 )

k = 2.303Vw L Iog-
hI (em / s 2)
(h l -h2 )tA h,

Average k = cm/s
.

k,o·c = Il T "C
kT"C--
- = em/s
- 112o •c

173
Modified Proctor Compaction Test
Zero-Air-Void Unit Weight

Description of soil Sample No. _ __


Location _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

Tested by Date _ _ _--,_ _ __

aEq.(12.1)

181
Modified Proctor Compaction Test
Determination of Dry Unit Weight
Description of soil Sample No. _ _-'-__

Location _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
Volume Weight of Number of Number
of mold _ _ _ _ ft3 hammer _ _ _ Ib blows/ layer _ __ of layers _ __

Tested by _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Date _ _ _ _ _ _ __

1. Weight of mold, WI (lb)

2. Weight of mold + moist soil, W2


(lb)

3. Weight of moist soil, W2- WI (lb)

4. Moist unit weight,

Y= W, -If; (lb/ft3)
1/30

5. Moisture can number

6. Mass of moisture can, W3 (g)

7. Mass of can + moist soil, W4 (g)

8. Mass of can + dry soil, W5 (g)

9. Moisture content,

w (%) = ~ -Ws xlOO


Ws-w,
10. Dry unit weight of compaction

Yd (lb/ft3)\ :(%)
+--
100

179
Direct Shear Test on Sand
Void Shear Calculation
Description ofsoil _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Sample No. _ __

Location _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _-,--_ _---,-_ _ _ _ _ __

Tested by _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _- - - - Date _ _ _~----

I
1

I 1. Specimen length, L (in.)

2. Specimen width, B (in.)

3. Specimen height, H (in.)

4. Mass of porcelain dish + dry sand (before use), WI (g)

I 5. Mass of porcelain dish + dry sand (after use), W2 (g)


1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 - - - - - ' 1 Ip'<C' ,
~ \g) x 3.808
<f ''(;6<"(
6. Dry unit weight of specimen, 'Y d (lb / ft3) = W; -
f LBH(m. )

7. Specific gravity of soil solids, Gs

8. Void ratio, e = G,'Y w -1


'Yd
Note: y w = 62.4 Ib/ft3; Yd is in IblW

i
bv!
'',
185
/)
f
II
Direct Shear Test on Sand , I
Stress and Displacement Calculation
Description of soil_~_.,.-_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _--:-_ Sample No. _ _ _ __

Location _ _ _ _ _~_ _ _ _ _. , _ . . . - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Normal load, N _ _'"'t5""6_',,,,~,_·._)_ _---,.Ib Void ratio, e _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

Tested by~ _____ ~ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

- ,)
() t? ()

() '2 f

i:~ . •

r)- i

10 (
)~(
I,
)
(';
,
,

I~, 0 "
t ",)

a, ,'

\,p') . r

* Plus (+) sign means expansion • <7 J 11 ~


r ('l ,~~
I Co!f-,"
t '1 J 187
,
I ~irect Shear Test on Sand
Stress and Displacement Calculation
Description of soil _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Sample No. _ _--'-_ _

Location _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _-,--_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

Normal load, N _ _....cl---,b:....,,_f_'_t.C,--,"'--,'_ _ lb Void ratio, e _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

Tested by _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

() o
. (,I

D' r ·r

I r, 0

"·0 ">,()

• Plus (+) sign means expansion ~'O


Cl'\'
~. z. ' r
•. (,
. '6 ?\,'l
189
Direct Shear Test on Sand
Stress and Displacement Calculation
Description ofsoil _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _~ Sample No. _ _ _ __

Location _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _~_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

Normal load, N _ _-,I_"c-I,_1_._~__ Ib Void ratio, e _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

Tested by _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _~__ Date _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

II .C>

'2.' 0

~ ·r

• Plus (+) sign means expansion

191
Consolidation Test
Time VS. Vertical Dial Reading
Description ofsoil _ _ _ _ _ _ _..,-_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

Location _ _ _- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _

Tested by _ _ _ _ _ _,--_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

Pressure on specimen _ _ Ib/ft2 Pressure on specimen _ _ Ib/ft2

195
Consolidation Test
Time VS. Vertical Dial Reading·
Description ofsoil _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

Location _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

Tested by _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

Pressure on specimen _ _ Ib/tt' Pressure on specimen _ _ Ib/fe

197
Consolidation Test
Time vs. Vertical Dial Reading
Description ofsoil _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _-'--__

Location _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

Tested by _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

Pressure on specimen _ _ Ib/ft2 Pressure on specimen _ _ Ib/tt"

199
Consolidation Test
Void Ratio·Pressure and Coefficient of Consolidation Calculation
Description of soil _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Location _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

Specimen diameter _ _ in. Initial specimen height, Ht(i) _ _ in. Height of solids, Hs _ cm = __ in.

Moislure Content: Beginning of lesl _ _ _ % End of lest _ _ _ _ %

Weight of dry soil specimen _ _ _ _ _ g G _ _ __


s

Tesled by _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Dale _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

201
Unconsolidated-Undrained Triaxial Test
Preliminary Data
Description of soil _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Specimen No. _ _ _ _ __

Location _ _ _ _ _~_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

Tested by _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Date _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

I. Moist mass of specimen (end of test), WI

2. Dry mass of specimen, W2

W,-W
3. Moisture content (end of test), w (%) = I 2 X 100
~

4. Initial average length of specimen, Lo

5. Initial average diameter of specimen, Do

6. Initial area, Ao = ~ D 2
4

7. Specific gravity of soil solids, Gs

8. Final degree of saturation

9. Cell confining pressure, 03

10. Proving ring calibration factor

203
Unconsolidated-Undrained Triaxial Test
Axial Stress-Strain Calculation

205
Consolidated-Undrained Triaxial Test
Preliminary Data
Description of soil _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Specimen No. _ _ _ _ __

Location _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

Tested by -'-_ _ _ _ _ _ _~_ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Date _ _ _ _ _ _ __

1. Moist unit weight of specimen (beginning


oftest)
2. Moisture content (beginning oftest)
3. Initial length of specimen, Lo
4. Initial diameter of specimen, Do

5. Initialarea of the specimen, A =!!.. D 2


o 4 0

6. Initial volume of the specimen, Vo = Ao Lo

7. Cell consolidation pressure, 03

8. Net drainage from the specimen during


consolidation, I:l V
9. Volume of specimen after consolidation,
Vo - I:lV= Vc
10. Length of the specimen after consolidation,

L =L (VV )1I3
c ' 0
c

11, Area of the specimen after consolidation,

207
Consolidated-Undrained Triaxial Test
Axial Stress-Strain Calculation
Proving ring calibration factor _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

209
Consolidated-Undrained Triaxial Test
Preliminary Data
Description of soil _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Specimen No. _ _ _ _~-_

Location _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _-,-----'-_ _ _ _ __

Tested by _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Date _ _ _ _ _ __

1. Moist unit weight of specimen (beginning


oftes!)
2. Moisture content (beginning oftest)
3. Initial length of specimen, Lo
4. Initial diameter of specimen, Do

5. Initial area of the specimen, A = ~D2


o 4 0

7. Cell consolidation pressure, 03

8. Net drainage from the specimen during


consolidation, I1V
9. Volume of specimen after consolidation,
Vo - I1V= Vc
10. Length of the specimen after consolidation,

L =L (Vc)"3
c 0V
o

11. Area of the specimen after consolidation,


213
A =A
c 0 (VcV.o J

211
Consolidated-Undrained Triaxial Test
Axial Stress-Strain Calculation
Proving ring calibration factor _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

213

You might also like