DCS Module-Ii
DCS Module-Ii
Dr. G.C.Behera
INTRODUCTION
• Concrete has very good compressive strength and almost
negligible tensile strength. Hence, steel reinforcement is
used on the tensile side of concrete. Thus, singly reinforced
beams reinforced on the tensile face are good both in
compression and tension.
• LIMITATIONS: MOR UP TO CERTAIN LIMIT-
• When B,D, Grade of Concrete and Grade of Steel is fixed.
• HOW TO INCREASE MOR
• A) Increase the section-may not be possible in some cases
• B) Increase amount of Steel in tension zone Astbal and steel
in Compression zone
THEORY
• MOR= (C or T)* Lever arm
• C is the compressive force of concrete in compression zone,( Limited
to a Value) can not be increased more than C=0.36*fck*b*xumax
• T is the tensile force due to steel in tension zone
T=Ast*0.87fy
To increase MOR, we have to increase C and T,
And C=T
T can be increased by increasing amount of Ast,
To increase C, we have to add some other material in compressive zone
to take compressive force along with concrete.
Let C1 is the compressive force due to concrete and
C2 is the compressive force of other material in compression zone,
As steel is the material which is very strong in comp and tension, add
steel in compression zonein compression zone,
Such reinforced concrete sections having steel reinforcement both on
tensile and compressive faces are known as doubly reinforced section.
DOUBLY REINFORCED SECTION
• However, other than in doubly reinforced beams
compression steel reinforcement is provided
when:
• (i) some sections of a continuous beam with
moving loads undergo change of sign of the
bending moment which makes compression zone
as tension zone or vice versa.
• (ii) the ductility requirement has to be followed.
• (iii) the reduction of long term deflection is
needed.
DOUBLY RC BEAMS
d’
• For fe250 stress strain diagram is linear, The strain at design yield stress
that is ( 0.87*fy=217.5 N/mm2 )/Es=0.0010875
• When sc is less or equal to 0.0010875, fsc = εsc Es
• When sc is greater than 0.0010875, fsc = 217.5 N/mm2
DOUBLY RC BEAM
DETERMINE MOR ?
MOR OF DOUBLY RC BEAMS
• METHOD-1: DIRECT METHOD
• STEP-1. CALCULATION OF xu
• Assume some values of xu
• Find sc
• Find fsc
• Find strain in tension steel
• xu= 188.15 mm
• Xumax=0.48d =0.48*460=220.8 mm
• Xu< xumax
• Find MOR
• MOR=M1+M2
• M1=118.70 kNm
• M2=59.60 kNm
• M=MOR=178.3 kNm
PROBLEM-DESIGN TYPE
• GIVEN, LOAD, SECTION , TO FIND OUT Asc AND Ast
PROBLEM-ANALYSIS TYPE
• Find out MOR of beam if 4,25 mm dia bars in tension side and
2, 20 mm dia bars on compression side, Beam size b=300 mm,
d=450 mm, d’=50 mm, M20,Fe415.
PROBLEM-ANALYSIS TYPE
• Find out MOR of beam if 4,25 mm dia bars in tension side and
2, 20 mm dia bars on compression side, Beam size b=300 mm,
d=450 mm, d’=50 mm, M20,Fe415.
• Solution:
• Given: b=300 mm, d=450 mm, d’=50 mm,
• Asc=628 mm2
• Ast= 1964 mm2
• fck=20 N/mm2
• fy=415 N/mm2
• d’/d=50/450=0.111, Take next higher value 0.15, fsc=342 MPa
PROBLEM-ANALYSIS TYPE
• Find xu neglecting fcc
• xu= 228.90 mm
• Xumax=0.48d =0.48*450=216 mm
• Xu> xumax over reinforced, put xu= xumax
• Find MOR
• MOR=M1+M2
• M1=167.62 kNm
• M2=85.91 kNm
• M=MOR=253.53 kNm
TYPE-II DESIGN PROBLEMS
• PROBLEM STATEMENT
• b, D, d, d’, fck, fy , Moment
• To find out Asc and Ast
• SOLUTION
• STEP-1
• Find out MOR of a singly reinforced balance section.
• STEP-2
• Calculation of Ast1
• a) If MOR( Sin.Bal) equal or Greater than Given Moment design the beam
as singly RC Beam.
• b) If MOR( Sin.Bal) < Given Moment ,design the beam as Doubly RC
balance Beam.
• M1=MOR( Sin. Bal), Calulate Ast1= Steel required to make the section as
singly Reinforced Balance section from the below equation.
TYPE-II DESIGN PROBLEMS
• STEP-3
• Calculation Ast2 and Asc
• a) Calculate M2=M-M1.
• b) Find out fsc from d’/d or by any other method by finding sc ,
• c) Calculation of Ast2 and Asc from these equations
• Step-2
• Calculation of Ast1
• Ast1=1100.80 mm2
• Step-3 Calculation of Ast2 and Asc
• M2=M-M1=200-158.65=41.35 kNm
• Ast2=254.50 mm2
• Ast=Ast1+Ast2=1100.80+254.50 =1355.29 mm2
• Provide 5, 20 mm dia bars as tension steel, Ast= 1570 mm2
• Calculation of Asc
• d’/d=50/500=0.1 , fsc= 353 N/mm2
G.C. Behera
T AND L BEAMS
• In previous section we have studied rectangular beams.
• When slab and beam are cast simultaneously( monolithic), then some
portion of the slab act as beam and bends along with beam in longitudinal
direction. This slab portion is called the flange of the T- or L-beam. The
beam portion below the flange is often termed the web, although,
technically, the web is the full rectangular portion of the beam other than
the overhanging parts of the flange. Indeed, in shear calculations, the web
is interpreted in this manner.
Beam2
Beam1 Beam3
Slab 1 Slab 2
Portion of slab acting as beam
T AND L BEAMS
Beam3
Beam2 Slab 2
Beam1 Slab 1
C
• Due to monolithic casting, beams and a part of the slab act together.
Under the action of positive bending moment, i.e., between the supports
of a continuous beam, the slab, up to a certain width greater than the
width of the beam, forms the top part of the beam. Such beams having
slab on top of the rectangular rib are designated as the flanged beams -
either T or L type depending on whether the slab is on both sides or on one
side of the beam. As the flanged portion is in compression, these potion
will resist more compression as area of flanged portion in compression is
more.
DETAILS AT 3 L BEAM
SECTION-2-2
SECTION-1-1
DETAILS AT 4 T BEAM
DETAILS AT 5
RECTANGULAR BEAM
DETERNINATION OF EFFECTIVE WIDTH
• The total width of flanged portion can not be considered as effective width of the
flanged section while calculating the total compressive force, because the total width
may not be effective resisting the force.
• The actual width of the flange is the spacing of the beam, which is the same as the
distance between the middle points of the adjacent spans of the slab, as shown in 3.
However, in a flanged beam, a part of the width less than the actual width, is effective
to be considered as a part of the beam. This width of the slab is designated as the
effective width of the flange.
• IS CODE PROVISION FOR FLANGED BEAM
The following requirements (cl. 23.1.1 of IS 456) are to be
satisfied to ensure the combined action of the part of the
slab and the rib (rectangular part of the beam).
(a) The slab and the rectangular beam shall be cast
integrally or they shall be effectively bonded in any other
manner.
(b) Slabs must be provided with the transverse
reinforcement of at least 60 per cent of the main
reinforcement at the mid span of the slab if the main
reinforcement of the slab is parallel to the transverse
beam
EFFECTIVE WIDTH CALCULATION
Clause 23.1.2 of IS 456 specifies the following
effective widths of T and L-beams:
(a) For T-beams, the lesser of
If xu=xumax, then
h=0.43*xumax
h=0.43*53d=0.227d foe Fe250
h=0.43*48d=0.2064d foe Fe415
h=0.43*46d=0.1978d foe Fe500
The value can be taken 0.2d
To find the relation between strain in
steel and concrete
ANALYSIS
h/d will be 0.227, 205 and 0.195 for Fe250, Fe415 and Fe500 respectively.
From this derivation we found if h/d is approximately 0.2 or less then, that portion is
having a stress 0.446 fck. If is more some portion is having stress 0.446fck and other portion
stress is parabolic and less than 0.0446fck.
The maximum value of h may be Df, at the bottom of the flange where the strain will be
0.002,
if Df /d = 0.2. in this case, the position of the fiber of 0.002 strain will be in the web and the
entire flange will be under a constant compressive stress of 0.446 fck .
On the other hand, if Df is > 0.2 d, the position of the fiber of 0.002 strain will be in the
flange. In that case, a part of the slab will have the constant stress of 0.446 fck where the
strain will be more than 0.002.Other portion of flange stress is less than 0.446fck and
parabolic.
ANALYSIS
Based on above analysis we
have the following cases:
i) When NA axis is within flange
It will be analyzed as Concrete
below the neutral axis is in tension
and is ignored. The steel
reinforcement takes the tensile
force. Therefore, T and L-beams are
considered as rectangular beams of
width bf and effective depth d.
Check whether the section is under
reinforced, balance or over
reinforced.
xu<Df
ANALYSIS
ii) NA axis is within web( xu> Df) and a balance section
a) (h/d or Df/d ) is less than or equal to 0.2
yf=K1*xu+K2*Df
The lever arm of the rectangular beam (web part) is (d - 0.42 xumax) and the same for the
flanged part is (d - 0.5*yf ). Moment of resistance will be
ANALYSIS
iii) NA axis is within web(xumax> xu> Df) and under reinforced
section
a) (Df/Xu) is less than or equal to 0.43
• The lever arm of the rectangular beam (web part) is (d - 0.42 xu) and the
same for the flanged part is (d - 0.5*yf ).
• Moment of resistance will be
ANALYSIS
iv) NA axis is within web(xu> xumax> Df) and over reinforced
section
a) (Df/d) is less than0.2 or(Df/Xu) less
or equal to 0.43
Step1: Calculation of bf
Df=150 mm
Actual width=1.65+0.3=1.95 m
lo=5 m
bw=300 mm
1.65 m
• Calculation of bf (For L Beam)
• b= actual width=1.95 m
• bf=1.17 m
• Calculation of bf (For T Beam)
300
• Calculation of c
• pt=(Ast/bd)*100=1.13%
• Vc=c*bd=0.65*300*370=72.15 kN
• Vsu=Vu-Vc=125.15-72.15 kN= 53 kN
• Taking 2 legged 8 mm dia bars
• Calculation of MOR
m
PROBLEM
• Determine Ast,lim and Mu,lim of the flanged beam of Fig.. Given data are: bf =
900 mm, Df = 90 mm, bw = 300 mm, cover = 50 mm and d = 450 mm.
Use M 20 and Fe 415.
SOLUTION:
STEP:1- Determination of Xulim
d=360+90=450 mm
Xulim=0.48*d=0.48*450=216 mm
(Xulim=216 mm)> (Df=90 mm)
Xulim passes through web.
Let us check (Df/d)=90/450=0.20
It is balanced section, Df/d=0.2,
it is in category (ii a)
STEP:2- Determination of MOR
Calculation of C and T
• Calculation Ast
• Ast=2626.33 mm2
• STEP-III: Calculation MOR
d=450 mm
Step1: Calculation of bf
Df=150 mm
Actual width=1.65+0.3=1.95 m
lo=5 m
bw=300 mm
1.65 m
DESIGN OF SLABS
Dr.G.C.Behera
SLAB
• Slab is the covering to a structure. Generally slab is a horizontal structure.
In some cases, these may be inclined also. The slab may be supported on
four edges or it may be supported on three or two edges or one side as
shown in figure. Depending upon the supporting conditions and
distribution of load, slabs may be categorized as
• 1. One way slab
• 2. Two way slab.
Bea Beam
slab
m or
or wall
Bea slab Beam wall
m or Beam
or wall or wall One way
wall slab
One way
slab
SLAB
• 1. One way slab
• 2. Two way slab.
slab
Bea Beam
m or
or wall Bea Beam
slab
wall m or
or wall
wall
Beam Two way slab
or wall If Ly/Lx less or
One way equal to 2
slab Where Ly and Lx are the effective length in longer
If Ly/Lx> 2 and shorter direction of slab.
LOAD DISTRIBUTION IN SLABS
Lx C
D
Lx/2
F
Ly
Ly-Lx
E
Width 1 m
2.6 m
Length 1 m
• Check for minimum steel:
• Ast=.12%*bD=0.12*1000*120/100=144 mm2< 300 mm2
• So, it is OK.
• Spacing of bars:
• Taking 8 mm diameter bars,
• M1=
• Vu=15.6 kN, Using 900 bend, l0=8*,
• l0=8*=64 mm
•
230 mm
2.73m
2.5m
Bar2
Bar1
Ld/3=
376.09/3 Bar2
=125.34
160 mm 0.1*leff=2.6*0.1=260 mm
mm
Bar1
Ld/3=
376.09/3
=125.34 mm 230 mm
340 mm
Bar 3 Bar 3
Bar 4
Bar 4
0.1*ly
CONTINUOUS ONE WAY SLAB
• Continuous one-way slab
ly
lx2 lx3
lx1
TWO -WAY SLAB( IS CODE METHOD)
• IF Ly/Lx less than or equal to 2, two way slab.
• Two-way slabs subjected mostly to uniformly distributed loads
resist them primarily by bending about both the axis.
However, as in the one-way slab, the depth of the two-way
slabs should also be checked for the shear stresses to avoid
any reinforcement for shear. Moreover, these slabs should
have sufficient depth for the control deflection. Thus, strength
and deflection are the requirements of design of two-way
slabs.
• Design for Shear:
• Vu=wu*Lx/2
• BENDING MOMENT CALCULATION:
• Two-way slabs spanning in two directions at right angles and carrying
uniformly distributed loads may be analysed using any acceptable theory.
Pigeoud’s or Wester-guard’s theories are the suggested elastic methods
and Johansen’s yield line theory is the most commonly used in the limit
state of collapse method and suggested by IS 456 in the note of cl. 24.4.
Alternatively, Annex D of IS 456 can be employed to determine the
bending moments in the two directions for two types of slabs: (i)
restrained slabs, and (ii) simply supported slabs. The two methods a
• (i) Restrained slabs
• Restrained slabs are those whose corners are prevented from lifting
due to effects of torsional moments. These torsional moments,
however, are not computed as the amounts of reinforcement are
determined from the computed areas of steel due to positive
bending moments depending upon the intensity of torsional
moments of different corners. Thus, it is essential to determine the
positive and negative bending moments in the two directions of
restrained slabs depending on the various types of panels and the
aspect ratio ly/lx.
FOR LY
FOR LX
Restrained slabs are considered as divided into two types of strips in each
direction: (i) one middle strip of width equal to three-quarters of the
respective length of span in either directions, and (ii) two edge strips, each
of width equal to one-eighth of the respective length of span in either
directions. Figures above present the two types of strips for spans lx and ly
separately.
• SLABS LY
LX
• The maximum positive and negative moments
per unit width in a slab are determined from
Where αx and αy and are coefficients given in Table 26 of IS 456, Annex D, cl. D-
1.1. Total design load per unit area is w and lengths of shorter and longer spans
are represented by lx and ly, respectively. The values of αx and αy , given in Table
26 of IS 456, are for nine types of panels having eight aspect ratios of ly/lx from
one to two at an interval of 0.1. The above maximum bending moments are
applicable only to the middle strips and no redistribution shall be made.
Tension reinforcing bars for the positive and negative maximum moments are to be
provided in the respective middle strips in each direction. Figure 8.19.2 shows the
positive and negative coefficients αx snd αy .
The edge strips will have reinforcing bars parallel to that edge following the minimum
amount as stipulated in IS 456.
The detailing of all the reinforcing bars for the respective moments and for the
minimum amounts as well as torsional requirements will be discussed later).
• II) Simply supported Slabs:
• The maximum moments per unit width of simply supported slabs, not
having adequate provision to resist torsion at corners and to prevent the
corners from lifting, are determined from
ly
• x and y can be determined for different k values.
• Effective span to effective depth ratio (cl. 24.1 of IS 456)
• The following are the relevant provisions given in Notes 1 and 2 of
cl. 24.1.
• • The shorter of the two spans should be used to determine the
span to effective depth ratio.
• • For spans up to 3.5 m and with mild steel reinforcement, the span
to overall depth ratios satisfying the limits of vertical deflection for
loads up to 3 kN/m2 are as follows:
• Simply supported slabs 35
• Continuous slabs 40
• The same ratios should be multiplied by 0.8 when high
strength deformed bars (Fe 415) are used in the slabs.
• Design of Two-way Slabs:
• Step 1: Selection of preliminary depth of slab
• Step 2: Design loads, bending moments and shear forces
• Step 3: Determination/checking of the effective and total depths of slabs
• Step 4: Depth of the slab for shear force
• Step 5: Determination of areas of steel
• Step 6: Selection of diameters and spacing's of reinforcing bars (cls.26.5.2.2 and 26.3.3 of IS 456)
• Step 7: Determination of torsional reinforcement .
• (a) At corner C1 where the slab is discontinuous on both sides, the torsion reinforcement shall
consist of top and bottom bars each with layers of bar placed parallel to the sides of the slab and
extending a minimum distance of one-fifth of the shorter span from the edges. The amount of
reinforcement in each of the four layers shall be 75 per cent of the area required for the maximum
mid-span moment in the slab. This provision is given in cl. D-1.8 of IS 456.
• (b) At corner C2 contained by edges over one of which is continuous, the torsional reinforcement
shall be half of the amount of (a) above. This provision is given in cl. D-1.9 of IS 456.
• (c) At corner C3 contained by edges over both of which the slab is continuous, torsional reinforcing
bars need not be provided, as stipulated in cl. D-1.10 of IS 456.
DETAILING OF REINFORCEMENT
• (i) Restrained slabs
• The maximum positive and negative moments per unit width of the slab calculated
are applicable only to the respective middle strips. There shall be no redistribution
of these moments. The reinforcing bars so calculated from the maximum moments
are to be placed satisfying the following stipulations of IS 456.
• Bottom tension reinforcement bars of mid-span in the middle strip shall extent in
the lower part of the slab to within 0.25l of a continuous edge, or 0.15l of a
discontinuous edge (cl. D-1.4 of IS 456). Bars marked as B1, B2, B5 and B6 in
FIGURE.
• • Top tension reinforcement bars over the continuous edges of middle strip shall
extend in the upper part of the slab for a distance of 0.15l from the support, and at
least fifty per cent of these bars shall extend a distance of 0.3l (cl. D-1.5 of IS 456).
Bars marked as T2, T3, T5 and T6 in are these bars.
• • Bottom bars B3 and B4 are parallel to the edge along lx for the edge strip for span
ly, satisfying the requirement of minimum amount of steel (cl. D-1.7 of IS 456).
• • Bottom bars B7 and B8 are parallel to the edge along ly for the edge strip for span
lx, satisfying the requirement of minimum amount of steel (cl. D-1.7 of IS 456).
• • Top bars T7 and T8 are parallel to the edge along lx for the edge strip for span ly,
satisfying the requirement of minimum amount of steel (cl. D-1.7 of IS 456).
• • Top bars T9 and T10 are parallel to the edge along ly for the edge strip for span lx,
satisfying the requirement of minimum amount of steel (cl. D-1.7 of IS 456).
SIMPLY SUPPORTED SLABS
• Design a slab over a room 4 m*6 m according to IS code method simply
supported and corners are not held down. LL=3kN/m2.Slab is supported
over 150 mm walls.
• ANS:
• Assuming effective length 4.15 m, taking Leff/deff=30, Let us take deff=150
mm. D=170 mm.
• Assuming effective cover 19 mm, deff along short span dx==170-19=151
mm.
• dy=151-4-4=143 mm assuming 8 mm dia bar.
• lx=4+.151=4.151 m or c/c=4.15 m lx=4.15 m
• ly=6+.143=6.143 or c/c=6.15m ly=6.143m
• ly/lx=k=1.48
• As per IS table
• DL of slab=1m*1m*.17*25=4.25 kN/m
• FF=1*1*0.02*24=0.48 kN/m
• LL=3 kN/m
• w=7.73 kN/m wu=1.5*7.73=11.595 kN/m
• Calculation of Moment
Pt=0.264%
Ast xx=.264*1000*151/100=399.37 mm2
Minimum steel=.12*1000*170/100=204 mm2
Spacing of 8 mm bars along short span direction
• So, it is ok.
Check for deflection
• leff/deff=4.15/.151=27.85 <(35*0.8=28)
DESIGN OF RESTRAINED SLABS
• Design the slab panel 1 of Fig. subjected to factored live load of 8 kN/m2 in
addition to its dead load using M 20 and Fe 415. The load of floor finish is 1
kN/m2. The spans shown in figure are effective spans. The corners of the slab are
prevented from lifting.
• Ans:
• Step 1: Selection of preliminary depth of slab
• The span to depth ratio with Fe 415 is taken from cl. 24.1, Note 2 of IS 456 as 0.8
(35 + 40) / 2 = 30. This gives the minimum effective depth d = 4000/30 = 133.33
mm, say 135 mm. The total depth D is thus 160 mm.
• Step 2: Design loads, bending moments and shear forces
• Dead load of slab (1 m width) = 0.16*(25) = 4.0 kN/m2
• Dead load of floor finish (given) = 1.0 kN/m2
• Factored dead load = 1.5(5) = 7.5 kN/m2
• Factored live load (given) = 8.0 kN/m2
• Total factored load = wu=15.5 kN/m2
• The coefficients of bending moments and the bending moments Mx and My per
unit width (positive and negative) are determined as per cl. D-1.1 and Table 26 of
IS 456 for the case 4, “Two adjacent edges discontinuous” and presented in Table.
The ly / l for this problem is 6/4 = 1.5.
• Table Maximum bending moments of Problem
Lx/5
Lx/5
Ly
STAIRCASES
Dr. G.C.Behera
INTRODUCTION
• Staircase helps in accessioning to different floors and roof of the building.
It consists of a flight of steps (stairs) and one or more intermediate landing
slabs between the floor levels. Different types of staircases can be made
by arranging stairs and landing slabs.
• The design of the main components of a staircase-
• stair,
• landing slabs
• and supporting beams or wall –
Two Flight
Single Flight
Helicoidal Type
Open well
Spiral Type
Plan
• (a) Tread: The horizontal top portion of a step where foot rests is known as tread. The
dimension ranges from 270 mm for residential buildings and factories to 300 mm for public
buildings where large number of persons use the staircase.
• (b) Nosing: In some cases the tread is projected outward to increase the space. This
projection is designated as nosing.
• (c) Riser: The vertical distance between two successive steps is termed as riser. The
dimension of the riser ranges from 150 mm for public buildings to 190 mm for residential
buildings and factories.
• (d) Waist: The thickness of the waist-slab on which steps are made is known as waist . The
depth (thickness) of the waist is the minimum thickness perpendicular to the soffit of the
staircase (cl. 33.3 of IS 456). The steps of the staircase resting on waist-slab can be made of
bricks or concrete.
• (e) Going: Going is the horizontal projection between the first and the last riser of an inclined
flight .
• The flight shown in Fig.a has two landings and one going. Figures b to d present the three
ways of arranging the flight as mentioned below:
• General Guidelines
• The following are some of the general guidelines to be considered while planning a staircase:
• • The respective dimensions of tread and riser for all the parallel steps should be the same in
consecutive floor of a building.
• • The minimum vertical headroom above any step should be 2 m.
• • Generally, the number of risers in a flight should be restricted to twelve.
• • The minimum width of stair should be 850 mm, though it is desirable to have the width
between 1.1 to 1.6 m. In public building, cinema halls etc., large widths of the stair should be
provided.
• The slab component of the stair spans either in the direction of going i.e.,
longitudinally or in the direction of the steps, i.e., transversely. The
systems are discussed below:
• (a) Stair slab spanning longitudinally
• b) Supported on edges AE and DH
• (c) Clamped along edges AE and DH
• (d) Supported on edges BF and CG
• (e) Supported on edges AE, CG (or BF) and DH
• (f) Supported on edges AE, BF, CG and DH
• In the case of two flight stair, sometimes the flight is supported between
the landings which span transversely as shown in Fig. It is worth
mentioning that some of the above mentioned structural systems are
statically determinate while others are statically indeterminate where
deformation conditions have to taken into account for the analysis.
CANTILEVER SLAB
FROM WALL
• Effective Span of Stairs
• The stipulations of clause 33 of IS 456 are given below as a ready reference
regarding the determination of effective span of stair. Three different cases are
given to determine the effective span of stairs without stringer beams.
• (i) The horizontal centre-to-centre distance of beams should be considered as the
effective span when the slab is supported at top and bottom risers by beams
spanning parallel with the risers.
• (ii) The horizontal distance equal to the going of the stairs plus at each end either
half the width of the landing or one meter, whichever is smaller when the stair
slab is spanning on to the edge of a landing slab which spans parallel with the
risers.
• (III) Where the landing slab spans in the same direction as the stairs, they shall be
considered as acting together to form a single slab and the span determined as the
distance centre-to-centre of the supporting beams or walls, the going being
measured horizontally.
• Design the waist-slab type of the staircase of Fig. Landing slab A is
supported on beams along JK and PQ, while the waist-slab and landing
slab B are spanning longitudinally as shown in Fig. The finish loads and live
loads are 1 kN/m2 and 5 kN/m2, respectively. Use riser R = 160 mm, trade T
= 270 mm, concrete grade = M 20 and steel grade = Fe 415.
• SOLUTION:
T
R
33.75
12.375 24.75
• The effective span (cls. 33.1b and c) = 750 + 2700 + 1500 +
150 = 5100 mm. The depth of waist slab = 5100/20 = 255 mm.
Let us assume total depth of 250 mm and effective depth =
250 – 20 – 6 = 224 mm (assuming cover = 20 mm and
diameter of main reinforcing bar = 12 mm). The depth of
landing slab is assumed as 200 mm and effective depth = 200
– 20 – 6 = 174 mm.
• Step 2: Calculation of loads
• (i) Loads on going (on projected plan area)
• (a) Self-weight of waist-slab =1* 25*(0.25)*(313.85)/270 = 7.265
kN/m2
• (b) Self-weight of steps = 24*(0.5)(0.16) = 2.0 kN/m2
• (c) Finishes (given) = 1.0 kN/m2
• (d) Live loads (given) = 5.0 kN/m2
• Total = 15.265 kN/m2
Total factored loads = 1.5(15.265) = 22.9 kN/m2
(ii) Loads on landing slab A (50% of estimated loads)
(a) Self-weight of landing slab = 25(0.2) = 5 kN/m2
(b) Finishes (given) = 1 kN/m2
(c) Live loads (given) = 5 kN/m2
Total = 11 kN/m2
Factored loads on landing slab A = 0.5(1.5)(11) = 8.25 kN/m2
(iii) Factored loads on landing slab B = (1.5)(11) = 16.5 kN/m2
Step 3: Bending moment and shear force (Fig. )
Total loads for 1.5 m width of flight = 1.5{8.25(0.75) + 22.9(2.7) + 16.5(1.65)} = 142.86 kN
VC = 1.5{8.25(0.75)(5.1 – 0.375) + 22.9(2.7)(5.1 – 0.75 – 1.35) + 16.5(1.65)(1.65)(0.5)}/5.1 = 69.76 kN
VD = 142.86 – 69.76 = 73.1 kN
The distance x from the left where shear force is zero is obtained from:
69.76-12.375*.75-33.75*(X-.75)=0
x = {69.76 – 1.5(8.25)(0.75) + 1.5(22.9)(0.75)}/(1.5)(22.9) = 2.51 m
The maximum bending moment at x = 2.51 m is
= 69.76(2.51) – (1.5)(8.25)(0.75)(2.51 – 0.375) - (1.5)(22.9)(2.51 – 0.75)(2.51 – 0.75)(0.5) = 102.08
kNm.
For the landing slab B, the bending moment at a distance of 1.65 m from D
• = 73.1(1.65) – 1.5(16.5)(1.65)(1.65)(0.5) = 86.92 kNm
1.76
0.94
X
12.375 34.35 24.75
• So, it is OK
• (ii) For landing-slab B
• So, it is OK.
• (B) Design of landing slab A
• Step 1: Effective span and depth of slab
The effective span is lesser of (Taking Depth D=200 mm, deff=174 mm)
(i) (1500 + 1500 + 150 + 174)=3324 mm, lcl+deff
(ii) (1500 + 1500 + 150 + 300) = 3450 mm, c/c
Leff=3324 mm
The depth of landing slab = 3324/20 = 166 mm, < 200 mm already assumed.
So, the depth is 200 mm.
• Step 2: Calculation of loads
• The following are the loads:
(i) Factored load on landing slab A(see Step 2 of A @ 50%) = 8.25 kN/m2
(ii) Factored reaction VC (see Step 3 of A) = 69.76 kN as the total load of one
flight
(iii) Factored reaction VC from the other flight = 69.76 kN
• Thus, the total load on landing slab A
• = (8.25)(1.5)(3.324) + 69.76 + 69.76 = 180.65 kN
• Due to symmetry of loadings, VE = VF = 90.33 kN. The bending moment is
maximum at the centre line of EF.
• Step 3: Bending moment and shear force (width = 1500 mm)
• Maximum bending moment = (180.65)(3.324)/8 = 75.06 kNm
• Maximum shear force = 0.5(180.65) = 90.33 kN
• Step 4: Checking of depth of slab
• In Step 3 of A, it has been observed that 135.98 mm is the required depth for
bending moment = 102.08 kNm. So, the depth of 200 mm is safe for this
bending moment of 75.06 kNm. However, a check is needed for shear force.
• τvu = 90330/1500(174) = 0.347 N/mm2 > 0.336 N/mm2
• The above value of τc = 0.336 N/mm2 for landing slab of depth 200 mm has
been obtained in Step 4 of A. However, here τc is for the minimum tensile steel
in the slab. The checking of depth for shear shall be done after determining the
area of tensile steel as the value of vτ is marginally higher.
• For Mu/bd2 = 75060000/[(1500)*(174)*(174)]= 1.65 N/mm2, Table 2 of SP-16
gives p = 0.512.
• The area of steel = (0.512)(1000)(174)/100 = 890.88 mm2/m. Provide 12 mm
diameter @ 120 mm c/c (= 942 mm2/m). With this area of steel p =
942(100)/1000(174) = 0.541.
• Distribution steel = The same as in Step 5 of A i.e., 8 mm diameter @ 160
mm c/c.
• Step 6: Checking of depth for shear
• Table 19 and cl. 40.2.1.1 gives: τc= (1.2)(0.493) = 0.5916 N/mm2. τvu = 0.347
N/mm2 (see Step 3 of B) is now less than cτ (= 0.5916 N/mm2). Since, τvu <
τc < τcmax, the depth of 200 mm is safe for shear.