Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to www.scribd.com

0% found this document useful (0 votes)
58 views18 pages

Geo Formulas

Uploaded by

CJEvan99
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
58 views18 pages

Geo Formulas

Uploaded by

CJEvan99
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 18

~


Borrow pit A
after
X to the
gettingLOSTthe ans.
.

5000 cu VA
M
Va 541 176 ( 4, 516 176 08
.

= = =
.

= .
. m ,
8 7
1 + . 1 + 0 85 .

Borrow PH B

4 , 358823 44
= 294crm =
1 5735
.

= .

10 7 .

Borrow Pit C

0007 = 4 , 447 039 12


10 6176 471
= .

= m
,
=
.

END OF SET 1
&
-Sar
E
-
sand Usand will go down
- value
com sand come method
- to determine ten relative compaction

18 Moist Unit W initial mass


O
*
Determine the volume of this hole
R =

max

Volume ?
.

Final mast
m 833(a81000)
2
Msand 5 912-2 378 YM hole !
-

327KN/m3-ans a
.

7
= .

= for s
. .
= = ·

Chole + cone)
=
3 .

534kg Unit Wt
the
since we know
density 19
. Compute the dry .

p = Ya =

= 07
=
16 . 193/N/m3

V = = 20
.
Compute the relative compaction
density ~ 1300
718 X 103
R = = = 0 8520 85 %
.
2 .

CHOle =
2 .
max

Holef come Choletcone)


Whole = 2 .
718X103 -

114X183 m
1 .

604X 10-3 com


>
= 1 -
analysis
E
* Sieve
commulative mass retain
get the

de
*
en
Mass
Minus
site
a4


D10 Dio Dso and DGo
Find the effective particle size thru interpolation
=
4 21

e
156 ,
.
.

10 1 2
ANS D1 0 16
Solving for Dio :
·
. .

=
.
.

78 2 .

M
1 .
4
! 22
. Uniform coefficient D6 [
D3 [
760 %

Duo/Dio
JBOY
NO Cu =
=

17 9
-
D10 = 0 .
159
Dio [ 10%

21 Determine the 2 31/0 16


effective particle size = Solve D30
.
.
.
for
Mode 3-4 (1nX)
Determine the Uniform Coefficient 14 44 Diameter-X -percent
=
22
. .

23 .
Find the coefficient curve 23 Find the
coficient curve 0 84
.

0 42
34
22

==0=
.

APPS > 30x 0 667


steps
-
=
.

of soil retained
Mass For D60
get the sum
-

Get the
Percentage Passing D60 2 31)
- =
.

-
calculate interms
Percent
of
-

100-100 Percentage Passing =

Calc

=

100 -

X 100 =

ANS -

# X00
60
= Calc

Cac until
pan to Zero
CMR-commulative Mass Retain Graph
-wellgraded
PSD curve =

Grading of soil
-

poorly graded passing


of -

nature Well graded SOLLA


-

Uniform graded - so yo-capgraded Particle Dia


GEOTECH I
-

consistency of Soil-Atterber Limits

-classification
100%%
Liquid When: i
Solid
Semia
Plastic S =

constants
er
=

·.
>W

Only applicable for fine grained soils.

W =
0 SL PL LL
S=100% - S = 100 %

Alterberg limits-values
of moisture content,
LL PL SL
, ,

, Shrinkage Limit- The water content where futher loss

!-i i
·

CA) Sample soil of moisture will not result in


any
-

more volume reduction .

w = Mi M2
(100%)
-

W = CV-V2(100) M2

[ -VL (10%)
SL =

-
SL =

[M
S
D
.
-

M2
M2
-
Vi-Va
2
(Pw)]100
> Pag
-
% N
gaming &

24 6 15
44 30
9()]100%
- -

.
.

-
-

=
30 30
= 17 667
.

C .
Void Ratio
100e
1000 I
=
Im
SL =

Je
=

W6s Es
sl = N
= > 100 %
17667 = e
= 0 500
.

ES 2 .
83

i
DryUnit
3 .

=
19 81)
.

= 18 .
508KN/ms
1 + 0 500 .
For65 s x = A w

2 .

Specific Gravity of solid


Msoil
6s =

Monterful-Mwater Stop ofsol)

980 538
2 447
-

=
= .

(360 330)
-B
V -
-

1840 -

480)
ison
1840-980
980 -
330 =

4501560- 530 -

Unt GsYw
.
6 Wt .
solid =

=
2 647 (9
.
.

81) =
25 .

968kN/m3
G .
St If the Shrinkage Ratio Is 1 83
.

To
Pw not
always I
=

=
SF 1 -
86n
Determination of Liquid Limit Determination of PL

Hands- Casagrande Cup apparatus


&
- The PL is defined as
the MC in percent,

Fall come method 8 at Cul the Son crumbles


,
When rolled

diameter
I Growingtool into threads
of 3 2mm.
in

to theto
/
separatetool
Grooving Semi-
Plastic
Separate the spoil
sail
2 . solid
-

Y2 inch
Brittlet
PL

MC-MassorWeigh An
e
Volume-
Solid Semi-Plastic Liquid
solid LK I
OLKI
LI < O
01 (10
C17 I
W

L PN- PL

W =
0 SL PL - L

#I

P1 Index (PD)
LL-PL-
Plasticity the content
=
is
range of water over

Who the soil remains plastic


L =
W-PL LIQUIDITY Many is a parameter used to define the

consistency
Ll PL
of grained soil of
-

V
a
gine
Pl
respect to LL and PL

Cl LL-W consistency Index Wh is also called Relative Consistency


L1-p/typo
=

OLD
indicates te
consistency of soil that is

(1 =
Correct
Firmness of a soil .
We represent consistency
PL
index by 12 and it is defined as

( + 21 1 the ratio
=
of the difference bla
the Liquid limit and the natural

water content of the soll of its plasticity Index.


N =
257
= 25%
[ J No Water
Blows content

43 21
.

PLASTIC Limit

Pl = [
Mw-Md 21 19 18 78 0 2270 22 78%
-

or
. .

= - = .
.

Md 18 78-8 20
.
.


Wt .

of Container
natural water content 3%
9
4l
is
.

I LL-PL
38
43 29
-

22

-
.

78
-
22 78
-
= 0 . 742
I Plastic
CLASSIFICATION OF SOLL
in general there are two
major categories
into wi the classification systems developed in the
past can be grouped.
The textural based the
-

classification is on
particles-size
distribution of the sand silt and clay-size fractions
,

present in given soil.


Textural classification US Department of Agriculture (USDA)
system by
-

The other
major category is based the
on
engineering
behavior of soil and talLes into consideration the particle size

distribution and the plasticity.


Lie ., L and PI
AASHTO classification system
-

Unified Classification system (USCS)


Primary components Secondary Options

USCS-DividedInto 2
majorcategories G-Gravel M-Silty
↓ course Grained soll-Gravels and Sand S-sank C-clayey
2
. Fine Grained
Joil -

Silts and Cays M-Sil -Poorly Graded


W Well Graded
C-clay
-

L- LowPlasticity y LL = 50 %
O-Organic (Sildays)
H-High plasticity
GRAIN SHE DISTRIBUTION =
4 75M
.
0 . 075M

COURSE FRACTION : It should be retained on no 200 Sieve


Gravel-Retained on No 4 sieve
.

and-Passed No 4 Sieve but retained


. on
no 200
. give
Fine Fraction- Passed on No 200 sieve .

sands Gravels
more than 50
% course 50 % or more coarse
passes No 4 Sieve retained 4 silve
fraction .

fraction on

x =
% Retained Gravel
% Retained Course Fraction
Retained Soil Gravel
Value
= -
to
classify if or
-
determine the classification
Y course
Fine or
Lanat ng na retain 200 course grained
classificationnongmasmaram , Sandor
- check if Kung Granthe

USS Method passed fine grain %


more than 50
-

SI 4
.

dapat may pass


a 288-remembe tu boundaries m plasticity Chart
SLEVE SOIL A retained criteria

100-Eto
↑ 60 X = JOIL B

200 30 -
Low

L 33
=
- -
CL
PI 12 100-3j
> 12 >12 = 0 .

571 retained SOIL C

R = 100 P
-

>7
100-30
-
30712
CL =

= stil
70 %? -
Atine
(ReA
-

Classification is GC

H
PLASTICITY
L Plastinty Chart
USDA Method
This
classification method is based on
the particle size limits
as described under the USDA Method

Gravel : Greater than 2 mm size

Sand : Imm to 0: 05mm gran size

Silt : 0 05mm to 0 002mm grain size


.
.

: Less than 0 002mm Intersection ng 3 after magline


day .
size
grain

SI . 5

.
%

Gravel 100 % 100 %


M 100 % 0
%
-
= = =

% Sand = 2 mm- % 0 .
05mm = 100 % -
60 % = 40%

% Si =1. 0 002mm- % 0 002mm


.
.
= 60 % -
15 % = 43%

%
Clay
=% 0 .
002mm-0 % =
1% - 0% =
100 %

15 .
Ac =

P % day
= 27
USDA Method (w/ Gravel)
Distribute the percent gravel into the sand ,silt and clay :
% Sand = % Sana +%. Grand sard
(m)
100
% -

% Gravel

=
sand (100 % %Gravel -

and
100
% Gravel
% Sand (100% )
Sand(mod)
= .

100 % -

% Gravel
it (100% )
Silt(mod =

100 % oravel

% (100% )
Claymod =
.

Clay
100%%Gravel

20 % Gravel
For ex .

, ,
10 % sand 30 % sit and 40 %
Clay
AASHTO Method

Acdg .
to this
system , soil is classified into seven major SI . 6 FROM LEFT TO RIGHT

groups : A I through
-
-7
735 235

F200

- -

Step-SOIL A
x =
A+ b -

(0)
o
Rules when it comes to Group Index S A-2-6-7A-2-7 PARTAL O
Step 2
-

Get the 61 =

61 =
(F100 35) (0 005LL) + 0 01 (F200 15) (P1-10)
-

.
.
-

SOIL B

S&Pl Sil 36 Min CLASSIFICATION =


A 7
-

Step 2 -

Get Pl = LL-PL
A 7 6
32 70
1
-
-

= -

(86 33[0 003 (0)] + 0 01 (86 13) (32 10) 33 47


=
61
- -
-

= .
.
.

JolL ( =
A - 2-4

Glpartial = 0 .
61 (34-15) (18-10)
= 1 .
52/2
Set 3 #1 2
,

FLOW WATER thro SOIL

Law : Vxi Laboratory HydraulicConductivity


Darcys Area
of soil
test for

V = ki Flow rate , > ↑ specimen A =

1 Constant Head
.
test :
Y
Where I L I
1 1 . .
Head Difference (h) is constant Q kit
=

=A
V =
Discharge Voloaty
-
it is superficial
-the
Area of Void un 1 2
.
. Hydraulic gradient (i) is constant
= o -

forconstantthe
Hydraulic Conductivity 1 3 Discharge (Q) constant

&
k= cross section . . Is

p ermeabili Falling Head Test :

-officient
Area soil
e
o f OF .
2
solids The
in Cross
Head Difference (h) a =

Q2A
varying
is
Section-A;
Discharge Seepage Velocity :
Hydraulic gradient (i) varying O

atatis
dS
is

Q AV =
kiA Q1 Q2 - AV ArVs
Discharge (Q)
= = =

varying
is
ch
Where = (E) y /VOH
-
-

VS n4
=
=

A Cross Sectional area


of t
= Inh
=

the sail perpendicular Us =


n
to the direction
of flow where : It =
in
o in
Vs =
Seepage Velocity
=
Porosity
SI .
I

Find the
discharge
=
2
1
.

V = Ki

V = 0 4
.

(3) = 0 .

/mm
24(15)
=

10(307(3) .
3 Compute the Sepage Velocity
If the e = 0 64 .

= 0 .

4 cm/min

n
=

64 390
= 0 .

1+0 . 6p
2 : 051m n
a
V +
=

x = =
#204
SI 2 ,

elvation
i Dh-Difference
= in
-

1= 10 27 (20) In (0)
768x10" Cm/SOL
.

= G .

(60)
#(4)
5 . Solve for the i after 60se.
2
i =

1 =
=

In the
soil after 60 sec
Compute the rate of the flow of water
6 .

Q = KiA

= 6 758x10 -
. ↑(2) (E) (4 = 0 .

017cm3/s

You might also like