CHAPTER I
PROBLEM AND JUSTIFICATION
1
Problem and Justification
1.1 Contextualization of the Problem
In the educational sphere, mathematics has traditionally been regarded as a
fundamental subject in students' formation. Mastery of it’s not only involves the
development of numerical skills, but also fosters logical thinking, problem-solving,
and abstraction abilities, all crucial for academic and professional success.
However, despite its importance, a concerning phenomenon has been observed
in the context of the Instituto Profesional y Técnico de Capira: the high failure rate
in mathematics among twelfth-grade students.
This issue not only affects students' academic performance but also impacts their
self-confidence and future professional development. A lack of proficiency in
mathematics can limit access to higher education programs and well-paying jobs,
perpetuating a cycle of inequality and social marginalization.
1.2 Justification of the Research
The importance of addressing this problem lies in several fundamental aspects.
Firstly, reducing failures in mathematics will directly contribute to improving
students' academic outcomes, which, in turn, could increase their motivation and
commitment to the educational process. Furthermore, by decreasing the number
of students who fail to pass this subject, new opportunities for personal and
professional development will open up for them in the future. This could have a
positive impact not only at the individual level but also on the socio-economic
development of the Capira community as a whole.
Additionally, tackling this issue can provide valuable insights into the most
effective pedagogical practices and didactic resources for teaching mathematics
2
at the technical and professional high school level. This could serve as a
foundation for the continuous improvement of educational programs and teacher
training at the institute, as well as inspire similar initiatives in other educational
institutions facing similar challenges.
1.3 Research Objectives
1.3.1 General Objective
1.To identify the Specific e main causes contributing to the high failure rate in
mathematics among twelfth-grade students.
2. To analyze the current teaching methodologies used at the Instituto Profesional
y Técnico de Capira and their effectiveness in mathematics learning.
3. To design an action plan that includes innovative pedagogical strategies and
appropriate didactic resources to improve students' performance in mathematics.
4. To evaluate the effectiveness of the implemented strategies in reducing failures
in mathematics and their impact on students' academic performance.
1.3.2 Objectives
1. The underlying causes of the high failure rate in mathematics will be analyzed,
laying the groundwork for effective strategies to address this issue.
2. The effectiveness of current teaching methodologies will be evaluated to
identify areas for improvement and optimize the teaching and learning process of
mathematics.
3
3. A comprehensive action plan will be developed that integrates innovative
pedagogical strategies and appropriate didactic resources with the aim of
significantly improving students' performance in mathematics.
4. A thorough evaluation of the implemented strategies will be conducted to
determine their effectiveness in reducing failures in mathematics and their impact
on the academic performance of twelfth-grade students.
1.4 Thesis Structure
This work is structured into three chapters, each addressing specific aspects
related to the problem of failures in mathematics among twelfth-grade students
at the Instituto Profesional y Técnico de Capira.
Chapter 1: Problem and Justification
Chapter 2: Theoretical framework
Chapter 3: Acknowledgements, limitations and perspectives
4
CHAPTER II
THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
5
Theoretical Framework
This chapter explores various theoretical and conceptual aspects related to
mathematical failure in the educational environment of the Instituto Profesional y
Técnico de Capira. A comprehensive review of the existing literature is conducted
to establish a strong theoretical framework to guide the research and the
proposed intervention. Topics covered include:.
2.1 Contextualization of Failures in Mathematics
The nature and consequences of mathematical failures in the educational
environment of the Instituto Profesional y Técnico de Capira are investigated.
Relevant statistics, historical trends, and demographic data are examined to
understand the extent of the problem and its impact on students and the
educational community as a whole.Failure in mathematics can take many forms,
each with its own characteristics and consequences. The three most common
types of math failure are:
Conceptual Understanding Failure:
Explanation: Conceptual understanding fails when students struggle to
understand the principles and concepts of mathematics. This type of failure often
results from learning methods that focus on memorization rather than
6
understanding. Students may be able to perform mathematical procedures, but
lack a deep understanding of why the procedures work.
Example: A student may know how to do long division, but cannot explain why
the algorithm works or how it relates to the concept of division. They may
encounter problems that require division in different contexts, such as dividing
fractions or understanding division as repeated subtraction.
Procedural Fluency Failure:
Explanation: Procedural fluency fails when students have difficulty performing
mathematical operations accurately and efficiently. This type of failure can be due
to lack of practice, inadequate guidance or lack of basic skills. Students may
understand math concepts but struggle to follow the steps necessary to solve
problems.
Example: A student may understand the concept of multiplication, but
consistently makes mistakes when doing multi-digit multiplication. They may
forget steps, misalign numbers or make calculation errors that lead to incorrect
answers.
7
Problem-Solving Failure:
Explanation: Problem solving fails when students are unable to apply their
mathematical knowledge to solve new or complex problems. This type of failure
often results from insufficient opportunities for critical thinking and reasoning.
Students may rely heavily on conventional methods and struggle with tasks that
require analyzing, synthesizing, or evaluating information.
Example: A student may be able to solve standard algebraic equations but gets
confused when presented with a word problem that requires defining and solving
an equation. They may have difficulty identifying relevant information, formulating
an equation, or interpreting results in the context of a problem.Understanding
such failures and their manifestations in students can help teachers identify
specific areas for intervention. By addressing these failures with targeted
instructional strategies and support, teachers can improve students' overall math
skills and reduce math failures.
2.2 Factors Contributing to Failures in Mathematics
Failure in mathematics is influenced by a complex interplay of factors. This
section analyzes the various dimensions that contribute to bad math, such as:
2.2.1 Individual Factors:
2.2.1.1 Cognitive skills: Students' inherent cognitive skills, such as problem-
solving skills, memory, and logical thinking, greatly influence their ability to
understand and apply mathematical concepts. Deficiencies in these areas can
lead to difficulties in mastering mathematics.
8
2.2.1.2 Motivation and Attitude: Students' motivation and attitude towards
mathematics significantly affects their performance. A lack of interest or a
negative attitude towards a subject can reduce commitment and effort, leading
to poor performance.
2.2.1.3 Learning styles: Different students have different learning styles
(visual, auditory, kinesthetic, etc.). A mismatch between teaching methods and
students' chosen learning styles can hinder the understanding of mathematical
concepts.
2.2.2 Socio-economic Factors:
2.2.2.1 Parental involvement: Parental involvement in a child's education can
affect his academic success. Students whose parents support and encourage
them do better in math.
2.2.2.2 Economic status: Students from low-income families may face
challenges such as limited access to educational resources, less exposure to
enriching extracurricular activities, and lack of a supportive learning
environment at home.
2.2.2.3 Cultural factors: Cultural attitudes toward education and mathematics
can affect student understanding and performance. In some cultures, there may
be stereotypes that math is inherently difficult or that certain groups are less
able to excel in the subject.
9
2.2.3 Educational Factors:
2.2.3.1 Curriculum Design: The design and structure of a mathematics
curriculum can affect student learning. A curriculum that is too difficult or not
sufficiently adapted to the developmental level of students can lead to
frustration and failure.
2.2.3.2 Teaching methods: The effectiveness of teaching methods is crucial.
Traditional self-directed learning methods may not be as effective as modern
student-centered approaches that encourage active learning and critical
thinking.
2.2.3.3 Teacher quality and training: Teachers' qualifications, experience and
continuous professional development are crucial to their ability to teach
mathematics effectively. Teachers who are not sufficiently trained in innovative
pedagogical strategies may struggle to engage students.
2.2.4 Psychological Factors:
2.2.4.1 Math anxiety: Math anxiety can significantly reduce students' ability to
perform well. Math anxiety can create a vicious cycle where students' fear of
failure leads to poor performance, which in turn reinforces their anxiety.
2.2.4.2 Self-efficacy: students' beliefs about their abilities to succeed in
mathematics affect their actual performance. Low self-efficacy can lead to a lack
of effort and persistence in overcoming math challenges.
10
2.3 Pedagogical Approaches in Mathematics Education
We will look at different pedagogical approaches used in teaching mathematics,
from traditional methods to more innovative and student-centred approaches.
The advantages and disadvantages of each approach are discussed and best
practices for teaching the discipline are explored.
2.3.1 Flexible Grouping:
With flexible grouping, students complete work in classroom as part of many
different groups depending on the learning task or content. Students can be
placed in groups based on their performance, interests, social/emotional needs,
or knowledge base. Groups can be purposefully or randomly assigned by the
teacher or the students can choose their own groups. Flexible grouping allows
for students to work with a wide variety of peers and avoids them from being
labeled as struggling or advanced.
2.3.2 Tiered Assignments:
Tiered assignments are activities that are based on the same mathematical skill,
but they are designed with differing levels of complexity. The assignments meet
the needs of: low level achievers, on grade level achievers, and above level
achievers. This ensures that all students in your classroom, regardless of their
ability levels, are making progress on the same skill or content.
2.3.2 Leveled Questions:
Create question to ask students in classroom that are based on the students'
different levels of understanding and readiness. For some of the students, leveled
11
questions can challenge their thinking and help them to use critical thinking skills.
For other students, leveled questions can provide the added support necessary
to begin to develop ways of thinking about mathematics. By integrating leveled
questions into your instruction, the questions then become accessible to all
students. Leveled questions can be used during whole group instruction or in
small group instruction.
2.4 Teaching Strategies in Mathematics
Let's look at the role of didactic and technical tools in mathematics education.
Available tools and resources, such as educational software, mobile apps,
simulations, and online resources, are analyzed and discussed for their
effectiveness in improving students' learning and math skills.
2.4.1 Jigsaw method:
The jigsaw technique is a method of organizing classroom activity that makes
students dependent on each other to succeed. It breaks classes into groups and
chunks assignments into pieces that the group assembles to complete the
(jigsaw) puzzle. The Jigsaw Method enjoys an effect size of 1.20. This makes it
one of the most effective instructional strategies you can use, This effective
strategy can accelerate student growth up to three years in one academic year.
In fact, the jigsaw method involves students reading new information .
12
2.4.2 Integration of math technology:
can create a positive learning environment that promotes student engagement
and eliminates excessive lecturing. It’s essential to uncover a balance and make
sure that the technology tools complement and enhance traditional teaching
methods rather than replace them entirely.
2.4.3 Cooperative learning:
involves students working together in small groups to accomplish shared goals
or complete group tasks. It is widely recognised as a teaching strategy that
promotes socialization and learning among students from preschool through to
tertiary level and across different subjects and curriculum areas.
2.5 Related Learning Theories
To better understand how students learn mathematics and develop effective
strategies to improve performance, it is important to examine several learning
theories. Here are three main theories related to mathematics education, with
explanations and examples of their application:
2.5.1 Cognitive Learning Theory:
Explanation: Cognitive learning theory focuses on the internal processes
involved in learning. It emphasizes the role of mental functions such as thinking,
memory and problem solving. According to this theory, learning occurs when
students actively process and organize information in their minds.
13
Example: Applying cognitive learning theory to mathematics education can
include teaching strategies that help students organize and structure their
knowledge. For example, using concept maps to visually describe the
relationships between different math concepts can help students understand how
different topics are related. Additionally, encouraging students to verbalize their
thought processes when solving problems can improve their cognitive
understanding of the steps involved in finding a solution.
2.5.2 Constructivist Learning Theory:
Explanation: Constructivist learning theory suggests that students create their
own understanding and knowledge of the world through experience and reflection
on experience. In the context of mathematics, this theory suggests that students
learn best when they actively engage with mathematical concepts and solve
problems in meaningful contexts.
Example: An example of the application of constructivist learning theory in
mathematics education is the use of project-based learning. In a project-based
learning environment, a student may need to design a small garden and calculate
the area and perimeter of the various parts. This hands-on exercise allows
students to apply mathematical concepts to a real-world problem, facilitating
deeper understanding through active participation and problem solving.
14
2.5.3 Sociocultural Learning Theory:
Explanation: The sociocultural learning theory developed by Lev Vygotsky
emphasizes the importance of social interaction and cultural context in learning.
According to this theory, learning is a collaborative process and students learn
best by interacting with peers and more experienced people (teachers, parents,
mentors).
Example: One way to apply sociocultural learning theory in mathematics
education is cooperative learning, for example in solving group tasks. For
example, students can work in small groups to solve a complex math problem,
discuss different strategies, and explain their reasoning to each other. This
collaborative approach not only increases their understanding of mathematical
concepts, but also develops communication and teamwork skills. Additionally,
adding cultural references and examples related to students' backgrounds can
make math more relevant and engaging.
By understanding and applying these learning theories, teachers can design
instructional strategies that meet the diverse needs of students, increase their
engagement with math concepts, and ultimately improve their performance in
math.
15
2.6 Research Methodology
It details the methodology used to conduct the study, including study design, data
collection and analysis techniques, and design of initiatives to address the
identified problem. It explains how the mathematical error reduction strategies of
the Instituto Profesional y Técnico de Capira are implemented and how their
effectiveness is evaluated.
2.6.1 Study Design
The design of this study is mixed methods, combining quantitative and qualitative
methods to obtain a comprehensive understanding of the problem and evaluate
the impact of the implemented strategies. The effectiveness of pedagogical
interventions is measured using a quasi-experimental approach.
2.6.2 Population and Sample
The target population of this study is all students of the twelfth grade of the
Instituto Profesional y Técnico de Capira. A representative sample will be
selected using stratified random sampling to ensure inclusion of students from
different academic achievement levels and socioeconomic backgrounds.
16
2.6.3 Data Collecti Techniques on
Several data collection techniques are used to ensure the accuracy and reliability
of the results. These techniques include:
2.6.3.1 Surveys: Surveys are administered to students to gather information
about their attitudes toward mathematics, their perceptions of current teaching
methods, and specific difficulties they face.
2.6.3.2 Interviews: In-depth interviews are conducted with teachers and
administrators to gain a deeper understanding of pedagogical challenges and
current strategies used in mathematics education.
2.6.3.3 Classroom Observation: Systematic classroom observations are
conducted to assess the dynamics of teaching and learning and to identify
effective pedagogical practices and areas for improvement.
2.6.3.4 Academic Performance Analysis: Students' gradebooks and test
scores are analyzed before and after the strategies are implemented to
measure their impact on academic performance.
17
2.7 Action Plan and Intervention
The action plan will include the following stages:
2.7.1 Identification of Causes: Based on the collected information, the main
reasons for failure in mathematics are identified.
2.7.2 Development of Strategies: Innovative pedagogical strategies are
designed to address identified causes, such as the use of educational
technology, personalized instruction, and student-centered teaching methods.
2.7.3 Implementation of Interventions: The developed strategies are
implemented in the classroom during the semester. Teachers receive training to
effectively implement these new methods.
2.7.4 Monitoring and Evaluation: The progress of the students is constantly
monitored and the effectiveness of the measures is periodically measured.
Statistical methods are used to analyze data and determine the impact of
strategies on student achievement.
18
2.8 Data Analysis
The collected data is analyzed using statistical and qualitative methods.
Quantitative analysis includes paired t-tests to compare results before and after
the intervention. In addition, descriptive statistics such as means, standard
deviations and frequency distributions are used to provide a detailed summary of
the data. Qualitative analysis involves coding and categorizing interview and
observation data to identify recurring patterns and themes. Thematic analysis can
be used to identify underlying trends and insights from participants' experiences
and perceptions. The combination of these methods provides a comprehensive
understanding of the impact of interventions on student mathematics
performance.
2.9 Research Limitations
Potential limitations of the study are acknowledged, such as sample size, limited
time to implement measures and potential biases in data collection. These
limitations are addressed in the recommendations for future research.
19
CHAPTER III
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS, LIMITATIONS AND PERSPECTIVES
20
Acknowledgments, Limitations, and Perspectives
An summary of the acknowledgements, restrictions, and future directions
pertaining to the study on lowering mathematics failure rates in the twelfth grade
at the Instituto Profesional y Técnico de Capira is given in this chapter. It
discusses the limitations and difficulties faced during the research, acknowledges
the contributions and assistance received, and suggests possible directions for
more study.
3.1 Acknowledgements
This study project would not have been able to be completed successfully without
the help and contributions of several people and organizations.
• Institutional Support:
The Instituto Profesional y Técnico de Capira's professors and management
offered important assistance and access to the resources that were needed. The
success of the research depended heavily on their collaboration in facilitating
data gathering and the use of intervention measures.
• Academic Advisors and Mentors:
We would also want to thank our academic mentors and advisers, whose advice
and experience greatly influenced the course and caliber of my study. Throughout
the whole study process, their encouraging words and helpful criticism were quite
helpful.
• Participants:
We are grateful to the parents, instructors, and students who took part in the
research. Their openness to sharing their knowledge and perspectives gave the
21
study vital information. Notable was the pupils' participation in the intervention
activities.
• Funding and Resources:
Additionally, gratitude is given to any programs or organizations who contributed
funds or other resources to the study. Their assistance made it possible to obtain
the required resources and made the study's completion go more smoothly.
3.2 Limitations
With the best attempts to perform an exhaustive and complete investigation, a
number of limitations were found that might affect the results and their
applicability to other situations.
• Number of Samples and Representation:
A particular sample of twelfth-grade students from the Instituto Profesional y
Técnico de Capira participated in the study. Even though a representative sample
was chosen, it's possible that not all twelfth-grade children in all situations or
places will benefit from the findings.
• Duration of the Intervention:
Over the course of one academic semester, the intervention tactics were put into
practice. This brief time frame might not be enough to see long-term impacts and
consistent gains in pupils' math proficiency. Studies with a longer time frame are
required to evaluate the therapies' long-term effects.
22
• Potential Biases:
Self-reported information from parents, instructors, and students was used in the
study; however, this information could contain biases such recall or social
desirability bias. Furthermore, the researcher's presence in the classroom during
observations may have had an impact on teacher and student conduct, which
could have an impact on the results.
• Resource Constraints:
The adoption of some cutting-edge teaching techniques may have been
hampered by limited access to didactic and technological resources. The quality
and accessibility of resources can have a big influence on how successful
educational interventions are.
3.3 Perspectives
In order to better understand and address the shortcomings in mathematics
education, a number of directions for future research are proposed, building on
the experiences and findings of this study.
• Longitudinal Studies:
Longitudinal studies that monitor students' performance in mathematics over
several years may be a part of future study. This would provide light on the long-
term consequences of intervention tactics and assist in determining the elements
that support steady progress.
• Broader Demographic Studies:
The findings' generalizability would be improved by broadening the study to
encompass a wider variety of educational institutions and student demographics
23
in various geographical areas. Comparative research may reveal elements
unique to a certain context and useful strategies that are flexible enough to be
applied in a variety of learning environments.
• Technology-Enhanced Learning:
Examining how digital resources and cutting-edge technology affect arithmetic
learning could provide fresh perspectives on creative teaching strategies.
Research may examine how to use virtual reality, adaptive learning platforms,
and artificial intelligence into the teaching of mathematics.
• Teacher Professional Development:
Future studies can concentrate on how well teacher professional development
programs help them advance their pedagogical knowledge and adapt creative
teaching techniques. It might be investigated more how teacher preparation and
math student outcomes relate to one another.
• Holistic Approaches:
Analyzing holistic strategies that take into account socio-emotional,
psychological, and academic components of learning may yield a more thorough
knowledge of how to help children overcome arithmetic difficulties. Research
might look at the benefits of peer support networks, growth mindset therapies,
and mindfulness.
24
Conclusion
Based on the our research results, conclusions are made about the effectiveness
of the implemented strategies to reduce math failures. In order to improve the
teaching of mathematics at the Instituto Profesional y Técnico de Capira, practical
recommendations and recommendations for future research that can expand and
deepen this topic are given.
Research can provide insight into the causes of math failure and provide practical
and effective solutions to improve academic performance in this critical area. The
successful implementation of the proposed strategies will not only benefit the
students of the Instituto Profesional y Técnico de Capira, but will also serve as
an example for other educational institutions facing similar challenges.
Instituto Profesional y Técnico de Capira's research on reducing math failure
among 12th grade students has provided valuable information on the factors
contributing to poor performance and the potential effectiveness of targeted
intervention strategies. Although the study acknowledges its limitations, it
highlights the importance of continued work and collaboration between teachers,
students, parents and decision-makers to improve mathematics education.
Future research should build on these findings, explore new methods, and
expand opportunities for broader and more sustainable improvement in
mathematics education.
25
Annex
26
Annex 1. Estudent observation.
Class Number
______________________________________________________________
Date
Category Aspects to observe Interpretation
Factors affecting the • Motivation.
Motivation. • Group
management.
Basic concepts in the • Theme to embroider
twelfth degree in the
area of theme to math.
basics and cognitive • Teaching strategies
development • Evaluation
Performance in the area
of mathematics.
Assessment. • Teaching Method
Teaching method
27
Annex 2. semi-structured interview carried out with the Math teacher.
Interview conducted with a teacher at the Instituto Profesional y Técnico de
Capira, for a research process to determine the factors that affect and influence
learning in the area of mathematics.
Prepared by the students of the University of Panama third year of their
Bachelor's degree in pedagogy.
Answer the following questions
1 Does the number of students influence students' learning of mathematics?
Because?
A Yes
B No
2. How do you involve the logical mathematical process?
________________________________________________________
3. How do you use the teaching material used in the development of logical-
mathematical notions with your students.
___________________________________________________________
4. Can you comply with all the terms related to learning mathematics.
____________________________________________________________
28
5. As a teacher, do you first take into account the concepts that secundary
students bring or do you start with new concepts?
______________________________________________________________
6. What strategies do you use to teach mathematics in the classroom?
_______________________________________________________________
7. What is your teaching methodology in mathematics class?
29
Annex 3. survey conducted with twelfth grade students of the Instituto
Profesional y Técnico de Capira, Survey carried out on students of the
professional and technical institute of Capira, for a research process and to
determine the failures and factors that influence failures in the area of
mathematics.
Prepared by the students of the University of Panama third year of their
Bachelor's degree in pedagogy.
Answer the following question.
1 do you like mathematics?
A. Yes
b. No
2 Does the teacher use different methodologies and strategies to teach them and
this help them understand better?
A. Yes
b. No
3 Do you think it is helpful to have a tutor to reinforce or study mathematics apart
from your mathematics teacher?
A. Yes
B. No
30
4 Do you find math class fun or interesting?
A. Yes
b. No
5 Do you understand what the teacher explains in mathematics class?
A. Yes
b. No
6 Does the math teacher explain to you again when you don't understand?
A. Yes
B. No
7 do you feel anxiety about math?
A. Yes
B. No
8 Do you learn mathematics better by working in a group?
A. Yes
B. No
9 Do you think your teacher provides you with enough tools to learn
mathematics?
A. Yes
B. No
31
10 Do you know the basic concepts and operations of mathematics?
A. Yes
B. No
32
Annex 4. photographs of playful mathematical activities.
33
CHAPTER I
PROBLEM AND JUSTIFICATION
1
Problem and Justification
1.1 Contextualization of the Problem
In the educational sphere, mathematics has traditionally been regarded as a
fundamental subject in students' formation. Mastery of it’s not only involves the
development of numerical skills, but also fosters logical thinking, problem-solving,
and abstraction abilities, all crucial for academic and professional success.
However, despite its importance, a concerning phenomenon has been observed
in the context of the Instituto Profesional y Técnico de Capira: the high failure rate
in mathematics among twelfth-grade students.
This issue not only affects students' academic performance but also impacts their
self-confidence and future professional development. A lack of proficiency in
mathematics can limit access to higher education programs and well-paying jobs,
perpetuating a cycle of inequality and social marginalization.
1.2 Justification of the Research
The importance of addressing this problem lies in several fundamental aspects.
Firstly, reducing failures in mathematics will directly contribute to improving
students' academic outcomes, which, in turn, could increase their motivation and
commitment to the educational process. Furthermore, by decreasing the number
of students who fail to pass this subject, new opportunities for personal and
professional development will open up for them in the future. This could have a
positive impact not only at the individual level but also on the socio-economic
development of the Capira community as a whole.
Additionally, tackling this issue can provide valuable insights into the most
effective pedagogical practices and didactic resources for teaching mathematics
2
at the technical and professional high school level. This could serve as a
foundation for the continuous improvement of educational programs and teacher
training at the institute, as well as inspire similar initiatives in other educational
institutions facing similar challenges.
1.3 Research Objectives
1.3.1 General Objective
1.To identify the Specific e main causes contributing to the high failure rate in
mathematics among twelfth-grade students.
2. To analyze the current teaching methodologies used at the Instituto Profesional
y Técnico de Capira and their effectiveness in mathematics learning.
3. To design an action plan that includes innovative pedagogical strategies and
appropriate didactic resources to improve students' performance in mathematics.
4. To evaluate the effectiveness of the implemented strategies in reducing failures
in mathematics and their impact on students' academic performance.
1.3.2 Objectives
1. The underlying causes of the high failure rate in mathematics will be analyzed,
laying the groundwork for effective strategies to address this issue.
2. The effectiveness of current teaching methodologies will be evaluated to
identify areas for improvement and optimize the teaching and learning process of
mathematics.
3
3. A comprehensive action plan will be developed that integrates innovative
pedagogical strategies and appropriate didactic resources with the aim of
significantly improving students' performance in mathematics.
4. A thorough evaluation of the implemented strategies will be conducted to
determine their effectiveness in reducing failures in mathematics and their impact
on the academic performance of twelfth-grade students.
1.4 Thesis Structure
This work is structured into three chapters, each addressing specific aspects
related to the problem of failures in mathematics among twelfth-grade students
at the Instituto Profesional y Técnico de Capira.
Chapter 1: Problem and Justification
Chapter 2: Theoretical framework
Chapter 3: Acknowledgements, limitations and perspectives
4
CHAPTER II
THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
5
Theoretical Framework
This chapter explores various theoretical and conceptual aspects related to
mathematical failure in the educational environment of the Instituto Profesional y
Técnico de Capira. A comprehensive review of the existing literature is conducted
to establish a strong theoretical framework to guide the research and the
proposed intervention. Topics covered include:.
2.1 Contextualization of Failures in Mathematics
The nature and consequences of mathematical failures in the educational
environment of the Instituto Profesional y Técnico de Capira are investigated.
Relevant statistics, historical trends, and demographic data are examined to
understand the extent of the problem and its impact on students and the
educational community as a whole.Failure in mathematics can take many forms,
each with its own characteristics and consequences. The three most common
types of math failure are:
Conceptual Understanding Failure:
Explanation: Conceptual understanding fails when students struggle to
understand the principles and concepts of mathematics. This type of failure often
results from learning methods that focus on memorization rather than
6
understanding. Students may be able to perform mathematical procedures, but
lack a deep understanding of why the procedures work.
Example: A student may know how to do long division, but cannot explain why
the algorithm works or how it relates to the concept of division. They may
encounter problems that require division in different contexts, such as dividing
fractions or understanding division as repeated subtraction.
Procedural Fluency Failure:
Explanation: Procedural fluency fails when students have difficulty performing
mathematical operations accurately and efficiently. This type of failure can be due
to lack of practice, inadequate guidance or lack of basic skills. Students may
understand math concepts but struggle to follow the steps necessary to solve
problems.
Example: A student may understand the concept of multiplication, but
consistently makes mistakes when doing multi-digit multiplication. They may
forget steps, misalign numbers or make calculation errors that lead to incorrect
answers.
7
Problem-Solving Failure:
Explanation: Problem solving fails when students are unable to apply their
mathematical knowledge to solve new or complex problems. This type of failure
often results from insufficient opportunities for critical thinking and reasoning.
Students may rely heavily on conventional methods and struggle with tasks that
require analyzing, synthesizing, or evaluating information.
Example: A student may be able to solve standard algebraic equations but gets
confused when presented with a word problem that requires defining and solving
an equation. They may have difficulty identifying relevant information, formulating
an equation, or interpreting results in the context of a problem.Understanding
such failures and their manifestations in students can help teachers identify
specific areas for intervention. By addressing these failures with targeted
instructional strategies and support, teachers can improve students' overall math
skills and reduce math failures.
2.2 Factors Contributing to Failures in Mathematics
Failure in mathematics is influenced by a complex interplay of factors. This
section analyzes the various dimensions that contribute to bad math, such as:
2.2.1 Individual Factors:
2.2.1.1 Cognitive skills: Students' inherent cognitive skills, such as problem-
solving skills, memory, and logical thinking, greatly influence their ability to
understand and apply mathematical concepts. Deficiencies in these areas can
lead to difficulties in mastering mathematics.
8
2.2.1.2 Motivation and Attitude: Students' motivation and attitude towards
mathematics significantly affects their performance. A lack of interest or a
negative attitude towards a subject can reduce commitment and effort, leading
to poor performance.
2.2.1.3 Learning styles: Different students have different learning styles
(visual, auditory, kinesthetic, etc.). A mismatch between teaching methods and
students' chosen learning styles can hinder the understanding of mathematical
concepts.
2.2.2 Socio-economic Factors:
2.2.2.1 Parental involvement: Parental involvement in a child's education can
affect his academic success. Students whose parents support and encourage
them do better in math.
2.2.2.2 Economic status: Students from low-income families may face
challenges such as limited access to educational resources, less exposure to
enriching extracurricular activities, and lack of a supportive learning
environment at home.
2.2.2.3 Cultural factors: Cultural attitudes toward education and mathematics
can affect student understanding and performance. In some cultures, there may
be stereotypes that math is inherently difficult or that certain groups are less
able to excel in the subject.
9
2.2.3 Educational Factors:
2.2.3.1 Curriculum Design: The design and structure of a mathematics
curriculum can affect student learning. A curriculum that is too difficult or not
sufficiently adapted to the developmental level of students can lead to
frustration and failure.
2.2.3.2 Teaching methods: The effectiveness of teaching methods is crucial.
Traditional self-directed learning methods may not be as effective as modern
student-centered approaches that encourage active learning and critical
thinking.
2.2.3.3 Teacher quality and training: Teachers' qualifications, experience and
continuous professional development are crucial to their ability to teach
mathematics effectively. Teachers who are not sufficiently trained in innovative
pedagogical strategies may struggle to engage students.
2.2.4 Psychological Factors:
2.2.4.1 Math anxiety: Math anxiety can significantly reduce students' ability to
perform well. Math anxiety can create a vicious cycle where students' fear of
failure leads to poor performance, which in turn reinforces their anxiety.
2.2.4.2 Self-efficacy: students' beliefs about their abilities to succeed in
mathematics affect their actual performance. Low self-efficacy can lead to a lack
of effort and persistence in overcoming math challenges.
10
2.3 Pedagogical Approaches in Mathematics Education
We will look at different pedagogical approaches used in teaching mathematics,
from traditional methods to more innovative and student-centred approaches.
The advantages and disadvantages of each approach are discussed and best
practices for teaching the discipline are explored.
2.3.1 Flexible Grouping:
With flexible grouping, students complete work in classroom as part of many
different groups depending on the learning task or content. Students can be
placed in groups based on their performance, interests, social/emotional needs,
or knowledge base. Groups can be purposefully or randomly assigned by the
teacher or the students can choose their own groups. Flexible grouping allows
for students to work with a wide variety of peers and avoids them from being
labeled as struggling or advanced.
2.3.2 Tiered Assignments:
Tiered assignments are activities that are based on the same mathematical skill,
but they are designed with differing levels of complexity. The assignments meet
the needs of: low level achievers, on grade level achievers, and above level
achievers. This ensures that all students in your classroom, regardless of their
ability levels, are making progress on the same skill or content.
2.3.2 Leveled Questions:
Create question to ask students in classroom that are based on the students'
different levels of understanding and readiness. For some of the students, leveled
11
questions can challenge their thinking and help them to use critical thinking skills.
For other students, leveled questions can provide the added support necessary
to begin to develop ways of thinking about mathematics. By integrating leveled
questions into your instruction, the questions then become accessible to all
students. Leveled questions can be used during whole group instruction or in
small group instruction.
2.4 Teaching Strategies in Mathematics
Let's look at the role of didactic and technical tools in mathematics education.
Available tools and resources, such as educational software, mobile apps,
simulations, and online resources, are analyzed and discussed for their
effectiveness in improving students' learning and math skills.
2.4.1 Jigsaw method:
The jigsaw technique is a method of organizing classroom activity that makes
students dependent on each other to succeed. It breaks classes into groups and
chunks assignments into pieces that the group assembles to complete the
(jigsaw) puzzle. The Jigsaw Method enjoys an effect size of 1.20. This makes it
one of the most effective instructional strategies you can use, This effective
strategy can accelerate student growth up to three years in one academic year.
In fact, the jigsaw method involves students reading new information .
12
2.4.2 Integration of math technology:
can create a positive learning environment that promotes student engagement
and eliminates excessive lecturing. It’s essential to uncover a balance and make
sure that the technology tools complement and enhance traditional teaching
methods rather than replace them entirely.
2.4.3 Cooperative learning:
involves students working together in small groups to accomplish shared goals
or complete group tasks. It is widely recognised as a teaching strategy that
promotes socialization and learning among students from preschool through to
tertiary level and across different subjects and curriculum areas.
2.5 Related Learning Theories
To better understand how students learn mathematics and develop effective
strategies to improve performance, it is important to examine several learning
theories. Here are three main theories related to mathematics education, with
explanations and examples of their application:
2.5.1 Cognitive Learning Theory:
Explanation: Cognitive learning theory focuses on the internal processes
involved in learning. It emphasizes the role of mental functions such as thinking,
memory and problem solving. According to this theory, learning occurs when
students actively process and organize information in their minds.
13
Example: Applying cognitive learning theory to mathematics education can
include teaching strategies that help students organize and structure their
knowledge. For example, using concept maps to visually describe the
relationships between different math concepts can help students understand how
different topics are related. Additionally, encouraging students to verbalize their
thought processes when solving problems can improve their cognitive
understanding of the steps involved in finding a solution.
2.5.2 Constructivist Learning Theory:
Explanation: Constructivist learning theory suggests that students create their
own understanding and knowledge of the world through experience and reflection
on experience. In the context of mathematics, this theory suggests that students
learn best when they actively engage with mathematical concepts and solve
problems in meaningful contexts.
Example: An example of the application of constructivist learning theory in
mathematics education is the use of project-based learning. In a project-based
learning environment, a student may need to design a small garden and calculate
the area and perimeter of the various parts. This hands-on exercise allows
students to apply mathematical concepts to a real-world problem, facilitating
deeper understanding through active participation and problem solving.
14
2.5.3 Sociocultural Learning Theory:
Explanation: The sociocultural learning theory developed by Lev Vygotsky
emphasizes the importance of social interaction and cultural context in learning.
According to this theory, learning is a collaborative process and students learn
best by interacting with peers and more experienced people (teachers, parents,
mentors).
Example: One way to apply sociocultural learning theory in mathematics
education is cooperative learning, for example in solving group tasks. For
example, students can work in small groups to solve a complex math problem,
discuss different strategies, and explain their reasoning to each other. This
collaborative approach not only increases their understanding of mathematical
concepts, but also develops communication and teamwork skills. Additionally,
adding cultural references and examples related to students' backgrounds can
make math more relevant and engaging.
By understanding and applying these learning theories, teachers can design
instructional strategies that meet the diverse needs of students, increase their
engagement with math concepts, and ultimately improve their performance in
math.
15
2.6 Research Methodology
It details the methodology used to conduct the study, including study design, data
collection and analysis techniques, and design of initiatives to address the
identified problem. It explains how the mathematical error reduction strategies of
the Instituto Profesional y Técnico de Capira are implemented and how their
effectiveness is evaluated.
2.6.1 Study Design
The design of this study is mixed methods, combining quantitative and qualitative
methods to obtain a comprehensive understanding of the problem and evaluate
the impact of the implemented strategies. The effectiveness of pedagogical
interventions is measured using a quasi-experimental approach.
2.6.2 Population and Sample
The target population of this study is all students of the twelfth grade of the
Instituto Profesional y Técnico de Capira. A representative sample will be
selected using stratified random sampling to ensure inclusion of students from
different academic achievement levels and socioeconomic backgrounds.
16
2.6.3 Data Collecti Techniques on
Several data collection techniques are used to ensure the accuracy and reliability
of the results. These techniques include:
2.6.3.1 Surveys: Surveys are administered to students to gather information
about their attitudes toward mathematics, their perceptions of current teaching
methods, and specific difficulties they face.
2.6.3.2 Interviews: In-depth interviews are conducted with teachers and
administrators to gain a deeper understanding of pedagogical challenges and
current strategies used in mathematics education.
2.6.3.3 Classroom Observation: Systematic classroom observations are
conducted to assess the dynamics of teaching and learning and to identify
effective pedagogical practices and areas for improvement.
2.6.3.4 Academic Performance Analysis: Students' gradebooks and test
scores are analyzed before and after the strategies are implemented to
measure their impact on academic performance.
17
2.7 Action Plan and Intervention
The action plan will include the following stages:
2.7.1 Identification of Causes: Based on the collected information, the main
reasons for failure in mathematics are identified.
2.7.2 Development of Strategies: Innovative pedagogical strategies are
designed to address identified causes, such as the use of educational
technology, personalized instruction, and student-centered teaching methods.
2.7.3 Implementation of Interventions: The developed strategies are
implemented in the classroom during the semester. Teachers receive training to
effectively implement these new methods.
2.7.4 Monitoring and Evaluation: The progress of the students is constantly
monitored and the effectiveness of the measures is periodically measured.
Statistical methods are used to analyze data and determine the impact of
strategies on student achievement.
18
2.8 Data Analysis
The collected data is analyzed using statistical and qualitative methods.
Quantitative analysis includes paired t-tests to compare results before and after
the intervention. In addition, descriptive statistics such as means, standard
deviations and frequency distributions are used to provide a detailed summary of
the data. Qualitative analysis involves coding and categorizing interview and
observation data to identify recurring patterns and themes. Thematic analysis can
be used to identify underlying trends and insights from participants' experiences
and perceptions. The combination of these methods provides a comprehensive
understanding of the impact of interventions on student mathematics
performance.
2.9 Research Limitations
Potential limitations of the study are acknowledged, such as sample size, limited
time to implement measures and potential biases in data collection. These
limitations are addressed in the recommendations for future research.
19
CHAPTER III
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS, LIMITATIONS AND PERSPECTIVES
20
Acknowledgments, Limitations, and Perspectives
An summary of the acknowledgements, restrictions, and future directions
pertaining to the study on lowering mathematics failure rates in the twelfth grade
at the Instituto Profesional y Técnico de Capira is given in this chapter. It
discusses the limitations and difficulties faced during the research, acknowledges
the contributions and assistance received, and suggests possible directions for
more study.
3.1 Acknowledgements
This study project would not have been able to be completed successfully without
the help and contributions of several people and organizations.
• Institutional Support:
The Instituto Profesional y Técnico de Capira's professors and management
offered important assistance and access to the resources that were needed. The
success of the research depended heavily on their collaboration in facilitating
data gathering and the use of intervention measures.
• Academic Advisors and Mentors:
We would also want to thank our academic mentors and advisers, whose advice
and experience greatly influenced the course and caliber of my study. Throughout
the whole study process, their encouraging words and helpful criticism were quite
helpful.
• Participants:
We are grateful to the parents, instructors, and students who took part in the
research. Their openness to sharing their knowledge and perspectives gave the
21
study vital information. Notable was the pupils' participation in the intervention
activities.
• Funding and Resources:
Additionally, gratitude is given to any programs or organizations who contributed
funds or other resources to the study. Their assistance made it possible to obtain
the required resources and made the study's completion go more smoothly.
3.2 Limitations
With the best attempts to perform an exhaustive and complete investigation, a
number of limitations were found that might affect the results and their
applicability to other situations.
• Number of Samples and Representation:
A particular sample of twelfth-grade students from the Instituto Profesional y
Técnico de Capira participated in the study. Even though a representative sample
was chosen, it's possible that not all twelfth-grade children in all situations or
places will benefit from the findings.
• Duration of the Intervention:
Over the course of one academic semester, the intervention tactics were put into
practice. This brief time frame might not be enough to see long-term impacts and
consistent gains in pupils' math proficiency. Studies with a longer time frame are
required to evaluate the therapies' long-term effects.
22
• Potential Biases:
Self-reported information from parents, instructors, and students was used in the
study; however, this information could contain biases such recall or social
desirability bias. Furthermore, the researcher's presence in the classroom during
observations may have had an impact on teacher and student conduct, which
could have an impact on the results.
• Resource Constraints:
The adoption of some cutting-edge teaching techniques may have been
hampered by limited access to didactic and technological resources. The quality
and accessibility of resources can have a big influence on how successful
educational interventions are.
3.3 Perspectives
In order to better understand and address the shortcomings in mathematics
education, a number of directions for future research are proposed, building on
the experiences and findings of this study.
• Longitudinal Studies:
Longitudinal studies that monitor students' performance in mathematics over
several years may be a part of future study. This would provide light on the long-
term consequences of intervention tactics and assist in determining the elements
that support steady progress.
• Broader Demographic Studies:
The findings' generalizability would be improved by broadening the study to
encompass a wider variety of educational institutions and student demographics
23
in various geographical areas. Comparative research may reveal elements
unique to a certain context and useful strategies that are flexible enough to be
applied in a variety of learning environments.
• Technology-Enhanced Learning:
Examining how digital resources and cutting-edge technology affect arithmetic
learning could provide fresh perspectives on creative teaching strategies.
Research may examine how to use virtual reality, adaptive learning platforms,
and artificial intelligence into the teaching of mathematics.
• Teacher Professional Development:
Future studies can concentrate on how well teacher professional development
programs help them advance their pedagogical knowledge and adapt creative
teaching techniques. It might be investigated more how teacher preparation and
math student outcomes relate to one another.
• Holistic Approaches:
Analyzing holistic strategies that take into account socio-emotional,
psychological, and academic components of learning may yield a more thorough
knowledge of how to help children overcome arithmetic difficulties. Research
might look at the benefits of peer support networks, growth mindset therapies,
and mindfulness.
24
Conclusion
Based on the our research results, conclusions are made about the effectiveness
of the implemented strategies to reduce math failures. In order to improve the
teaching of mathematics at the Instituto Profesional y Técnico de Capira, practical
recommendations and recommendations for future research that can expand and
deepen this topic are given.
Research can provide insight into the causes of math failure and provide practical
and effective solutions to improve academic performance in this critical area. The
successful implementation of the proposed strategies will not only benefit the
students of the Instituto Profesional y Técnico de Capira, but will also serve as
an example for other educational institutions facing similar challenges.
Instituto Profesional y Técnico de Capira's research on reducing math failure
among 12th grade students has provided valuable information on the factors
contributing to poor performance and the potential effectiveness of targeted
intervention strategies. Although the study acknowledges its limitations, it
highlights the importance of continued work and collaboration between teachers,
students, parents and decision-makers to improve mathematics education.
Future research should build on these findings, explore new methods, and
expand opportunities for broader and more sustainable improvement in
mathematics education.
25
Annex
26
Annex 1. Estudent observation.
Class Number
______________________________________________________________
Date
Category Aspects to observe Interpretation
Factors affecting the • Motivation.
Motivation. • Group
management.
Basic concepts in the • Theme to embroider
twelfth degree in the
area of theme to math.
basics and cognitive • Teaching strategies
development • Evaluation
Performance in the area
of mathematics.
Assessment. • Teaching Method
Teaching method
27
Annex 2. semi-structured interview carried out with the Math teacher.
Interview conducted with a teacher at the Instituto Profesional y Técnico de
Capira, for a research process to determine the factors that affect and influence
learning in the area of mathematics.
Prepared by the students of the University of Panama third year of their
Bachelor's degree in pedagogy.
Answer the following questions
1 Does the number of students influence students' learning of mathematics?
Because?
A Yes
B No
2. How do you involve the logical mathematical process?
________________________________________________________
3. How do you use the teaching material used in the development of logical-
mathematical notions with your students.
___________________________________________________________
4. Can you comply with all the terms related to learning mathematics.
____________________________________________________________
28
5. As a teacher, do you first take into account the concepts that secundary
students bring or do you start with new concepts?
______________________________________________________________
6. What strategies do you use to teach mathematics in the classroom?
_______________________________________________________________
7. What is your teaching methodology in mathematics class?
29
Annex 3. survey conducted with twelfth grade students of the Instituto
Profesional y Técnico de Capira, Survey carried out on students of the
professional and technical institute of Capira, for a research process and to
determine the failures and factors that influence failures in the area of
mathematics.
Prepared by the students of the University of Panama third year of their
Bachelor's degree in pedagogy.
Answer the following question.
1 do you like mathematics?
A. Yes
b. No
2 Does the teacher use different methodologies and strategies to teach them and
this help them understand better?
A. Yes
b. No
3 Do you think it is helpful to have a tutor to reinforce or study mathematics apart
from your mathematics teacher?
A. Yes
B. No
30
4 Do you find math class fun or interesting?
A. Yes
b. No
5 Do you understand what the teacher explains in mathematics class?
A. Yes
b. No
6 Does the math teacher explain to you again when you don't understand?
A. Yes
B. No
7 do you feel anxiety about math?
A. Yes
B. No
8 Do you learn mathematics better by working in a group?
A. Yes
B. No
9 Do you think your teacher provides you with enough tools to learn
mathematics?
A. Yes
B. No
31
10 Do you know the basic concepts and operations of mathematics?
A. Yes
B. No
32
Annex 4. photographs of playful mathematical activities.
33