Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to www.scribd.com

0% found this document useful (0 votes)
17 views9 pages

Das Working in QA But From Design

The annual performance appraisal for Amit Das, employee ID 41864, highlights key achievements such as the successful completion of various check sheets and the implementation of quality and safety measures. Areas for improvement include the need for better supervision and training for contractors and welders. The overall rating is G1, indicating that Amit significantly exceeds objectives.

Uploaded by

Totan Kar
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
17 views9 pages

Das Working in QA But From Design

The annual performance appraisal for Amit Das, employee ID 41864, highlights key achievements such as the successful completion of various check sheets and the implementation of quality and safety measures. Areas for improvement include the need for better supervision and training for contractors and welders. The overall rating is G1, indicating that Amit significantly exceeds objectives.

Uploaded by

Totan Kar
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 9

ANNUAL PERFOR

ASSESSMENT PER
EMPLOYEE NAME: AMIT DAS

EMPLOYEE ID: 41864

DATE OF JOINING: 1/13/1996

PERSPECTIVE VALUES

CUSTOMER FIRST

COST
(FINANCIAL) CUSTOMER FIRST

CUSTOMER FIRST

Integrity

QUALITY Integrity
(CUSTOMER)

Integrity

SAFETY & Safety


PRODUCTIVITY
(INTERNAL
BUSINESS
PROCESS) Safety
LEARNING
(LEARNING & Sustainability
GROWTH)

TOTAL SCORE

OVERALL RATING

KEY ACHIEVEMENTS
900 NOS BOXNS Wagon sucessfully Pulled out on time.

AREAS OF IMPROVEMENT / WHAT COULD HAVE BEEN DONE BETTER


1. Contractors, Sub contractors must have Supervisor in each stage of job & change of supervisor in stage must have informa
2. Contractors, Welder must be practically trained by welding Engineer and the trained welder have identification card on hi
3. All instrument Properly need in proper work place.

TRAINING NEEDS (if any)


1. Need Level II training course on VT, LPT, MPT, UT,& RT.
2. Training Course on Welding Technology.

APPRAISER'S COMMENTS

REMARKS OF EMC (for Normalization)

RATING INDEX:
TOTAL SCORE
5.00 - 4.50
4.49 - 3.50
3.49 - 2.50
2.49 - 1.50
1.49 - 0.00
ANNUAL PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL
ASSESSMENT PERIOD: FY 2024 - 2025
AMIT DAS DESIGNATION:

DEPARTMENT /
41864 FUNCTION:
1/13/1996 SBU / LOCATION:

TARGETS
(Maximum 8 KRA's to be mentioned)

WEIGHTAGE
ACTUALS (10% MIN)

1. Sucessfully completed check sheets ( BOXNHL , BOXNS & BCNA ) 15%

2. Sucessfully completed check sheets ( BOBRN , BLCS & BLCM

15%

3. SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED CHECK SHEETS ( BVCM ) 10%

40%

1. Impelemented 100% quality gets at stage for door operation coupler articulation 10%
& safety Items.

2. Sucessfully reducting the rework or rectification /rejection of the following. 10%

3. All BOXNS Wagons related and necessary documents and Records submitted to 10%
RDSO AW.

30%

1. At AW plant awareness have been made for welding safety, Lock bolting coupler 10%
height, cp top fitment etc.to the all staff/workers by making and hanging the flex.

2. During stage inspection follow up continuing for Workmen PPE using, and giving 10%
awareness about saftey regular basis
20%

Sucessfully implemented & continuing training every day at 11:00 am amongst the
quality team for sharing and gathering the technical knowledge to minimize 10%
knowledge gap amongst the team thus, faster the inspection actvities and instant
decision making.
10%
100%

G4 ( Physically unfit and not productive),

lled out on time.

OULD HAVE BEEN DONE BETTER


have Supervisor in each stage of job & change of supervisor in stage must have information to QA & Production.
cally trained by welding Engineer and the trained welder have identification card on his chest along with name.
per work place.

, LPT, MPT, UT,& RT.


logy.

OVERALL RATING EXPLANATION


G1 Exceeds Objectives Significantly
G2 Exceeds Objectives
G3 Meets Objectives
G4 Meets Objectives Partially
G5 Doesn’t Meet Objectives
PPRAISAL
- 2025
QA ASSISTANT REPORTING MANAGER /
ENGINEER DEPARTMENTAL HEAD: MR. ABHIJIT DUTTA

SBU HEAD / FUNCTIONAL


FCD, QA
HEAD: MR. TOTAN KAR

AGARPARA WORKS DATE: 3/17/2025

ASSESSMENT RATING
RATING SCALE - 5, 4, 3, 2, 1 (Five-Point Scale)
5 being the Highest & 1 being the Lowest

SELF ASSESSMENT REPORTING ASSESSMENT SBU HEAD / ASSESSMENT


ACHIEVED RATING SCORE MANAGER SCORE FUNCTIONAL SCORE
RATING HEAD RATING

ASSESSMENT SCORE = WEIGHTAGE*RATING

Achieved up to 5 0.75 2 0.30 2 0.30


the client
satisfactory level

Achieved up to 5 0.75 2 0.30 2 0.30


the client
satisfactory level

Achieved up to 4 0.40 2 0.20 2 0.20


the client
satisfactory level
2

5 0.50 2 0.20 2 0.20

5 0.50 2 0.20 2 0.20

5 0.50 2 0.20 2 0.20

5 0.50 5 0.50 2 0.20

5 0.50 2 0.20 2 0.20


2

5 0.50 2 0.20 2 0.20

44 4.9 21 2.30 24 2.00

Physically unfit and not productive), may be paid off

roduction.
ith name.

ANATION
eds Objectives Significantly
eds Objectives
ts Objectives
ts Objectives Partially
n’t Meet Objectives

You might also like