Learning
Learning
Learni'!P............. .
I
I I I I I I
■■•• 1 1 I I I I I . • ••
1 11
■•••••••••• . he
h s got th e po w er of
a rea son iY \
.,
\
· an of cr ea tio n- . . a ke y pr oc es s m . h
Man is 'd to be m Le um an ~g ~-•
sa1 h' gs quickly. ar ni ng is be1--,.~"
enables him to le a7 ~ k ur cu sto m s, ou r a tt· t d
~he language we sp eah' 1 u e_s and41chel~~.
It plays a central ~o e ~ :x pe rie nc e. Fr om bi rth
in behaviour tb ro ug onward il\
Learning cause c a~~ s an d ad ap t old on
es to ch ~
before orgam acquires new response
e: en tor y of re ac tio ns , th es e habits ·P"_ 0 "'t
, Achieving an evergro wing reper
circumstances . . d bile ot he rs funct1. .
. . S e last only for a s hor t peno , W 0n ag am and againeJ-g ;.:
•q11t
. . .d d
on a 1 y traits ~
m ti~ e. oo; ro ug ho ut th 1 O ur goals an pe rs 1·t
e life of an md~v1 ~a~o
~~: r~s:lt of learning. Theref~re_ lea t co nfined to school learnin
g, cycn;
rmmngp::hensive te rm w
reading, writing ?r typm · g but 1t 1s a co hi ch leaves a pennane!
. . . ual Experience-di · ·
effect or impression on d rect or 1ndir~ · t · fi d t
c _1s_ oun o Play
a dominant role in mo an_ m ivid h. in the behaviour of an
uldmg and s ap g md1v1dual from the
very beginning. .• :
. . d fin ed as
.Learning has b~en co 1 ch ange in be ha vi ou r as
mm~n: ~~ burning ca ·a result of
expenence. Thus a chh1ld ndle for th e fir st time
from such candle on t e whto ca c _eosn because of previous ex runs away
refers to learning as a ne x occas 1 pe rie nc e. Bo otzin (1991)
long lasting change in . , d. .t. t
•
certam ways as a res ult f xperience an org am _sm ~ 1spos1 rnn _o bhe h .
ave ~
behaviour. Behaviour also e • For Este,s , le ar nm g 1s a sy ste m at ic
c ange m
o changes through drug . ,
and hence cannot be inc s bu t th at ch an ge IS
luded in learning. n~ t sy ste matic
Hillgard divides the to
tality of human le ar ne
categories. d ac tiv iti es in to thre
e broad
(i) Activities like ac
quiring a vocabulary, mem
a typewriter etc. which orising a poem, le ar ni ng
are ~bviously learned. to 'operate
(ii ) Activities as ac _j
quiring of prejudic~s and •
and ideals which are no preferences an d ot he r so
t quite as obviously lear cial attitudes
(ii i) Activities like ned. ,.
ticks, m
demonstrative utility. annerisms and gestures etc. which have no
·readily
Besides these learned ac : '
' "Native responses". Am tivities there are some ot
ong these are the nest bu he r activities which come
ilding activiti.es of birds, under
response, moth's dashin child's sucking
g towards a flame, new
mother's pouch etc., etc born Kangaroo's mount
. All these responses ar ing into the
learning. Now there ar e in nate an d hence do no
e some border line cases t come under
an d 'Learned responses'. which fall between 'Nat
This can be illustrated by iv_e responses'
Lorenz on imprinting. considering the experim
Newly hatched ducks, ch ent of Prof.
ar e prepared instinctiv icks and other ground-n
ely to follow _the first lar estling birds
ge moving object they
see during the
,1,,·,,g
. /6/
l . I e911Y pen'd
o and con tinu e t 0 .
9 follow this
cti!JC renz acted one suc h mo th . as if it were the mother.
oi {JOaction between learning and er in the case of ysame object Th • . an example
. . n t' oung duckl' . mg s. Ls is
,. ·,iter · aturatwn interaction a ive resp ons e Th.
of I . g-m Ls tnfact is also an example of
we hav · ·
1eorrit1i t this poi nt
A . e conie to
This IS ma tur atio n. M ~nother important t of behaviour
cb811 g~-ur cha nge s wit hou t int atu
:ati on or growth is factor at !he roo
rni ng S e:v enm g pra ctic e it. -~lso a modifier of behaviour. If
beb8v10 through lea m~tur~tion
of tadp~lesis;~ to_ develop_ through pnm
9~d not f ma tur atio n. He~ wu~ming flymg of bird s are anl y a
esult O• . e aga in the re are ich are due to
n and 1ear mn g bot h. Dev elo p t some borderline cases wh
r att1r at1o g b th h' .
·id spe.aks a lan gua ge a t a pro per sta men off lan . gua e. Y e c Ild 1s one such case.
t ch.I
J11
ge his development but the langua
O ge tha t
be speak~ _is t~e lan gua ge tha t he lea i and
. r Thus a Bengali child learns Bengal
I{0.shn11n child lea rns Ka shm iri at t~s
p oper stage of their development.
8
Thus we see tha t our activit' controlled b_Y thr ee 1ac e:
d 1 mn · ere is
ies arestan
a con . tor~, Native _responses,
!!laturatio~ an ear g. Th lding
our al pat ter ns. Lea rni ng d t 1~teract10n between this factors m bui
r beh aVI ess effects.
oes not mclude fatigue or drug or illn
~: neither includes nat ive or inn ate does it include such responses as
to ma tur ati on A ~~s pon ses nor
attributable ult from
riou s' as we ll as from di . t cco r ~g to Bandura (1986)d, learning can res
~e nces·' m· Oth er wor s you can be affected by
'uicarving events and behavi rec .expene by participating in
b
o se our s m your environment as well as
them .
Defining Le ar nin g has
s controversy in psychology . This term
The_very def init ion of _learning stir oris ts.
rJ:> ret~ d alw ays m the sam e way by different psychologists and the
not been mte hungry,
l, learnm _g a fun ctio n of rein forc ement. Reinforcement may be food for
For Hul IS a response
fettered. The probability is high for
water for the thi rsty , freedom for the rning occurs automatically if stimuli
get s rein for ced . For Gu thri e lea
. to be learned if it
Thorndike learning is function of rew
ard
vem ents occ ur sim ulta neo usl y. For
and mo it ends in
pun ish me nts . The pro bab ilit y is high for a response to be learned if
and annoying
ishment or in any such thing tha t is
reward and if the res pon se ends in pun
r, the pro bab ilit y to lea rn the resp onse is low . For Gestalt, Learning is
to the learne aviour
tion of cog niti ve stru ctu re. The em phasis is on spatial organization of beh
afunc ding of
of perception and cognitive understan
thus learning occurs as a· res ult
tion shi ps in the beh avi our field. According to behaviouralists, learning
~ignificant rela ording
tive ly per ma nen t cha nge in beh avi our tha t results from experience. Acc
1s a rela permanent
s by which organism makes relatively
to cognitive the ori sts it is the proces _c~anges
ironment because of_exp~rience. These
~hanges in the wa y th~y rep res ent the env fully determme 1t. Some defimt10ns
of
org ani sm 's beh avi our but do _not
mfluence the
as given below :
~earning by various psychologists are