LH Fe
LH Fe
L - 01
LECTURE HANDOUTS
CIVIL V / III
Date of Lecture:
Introduction:
Soil investigation and soil explorations are conducted for the purpose of site investigation
to get clear information about the soil properties and hydrological conditions at the site.
Prerequisite knowledge for Complete understanding and learning of Topic:
Basics of soil mechanics
Site investigation
Soil properties
Soil mechanics
Detailed content of the Lecture:
Purpose of Soil Exploration
The purpose of site exploration is to get detailed information about
Order of occurrences and extent of soil and rock strata.
Nature and engineering properties of of the soil and rock formation.
Location of groundwater and its variation.
Methods of Soil Exploration
Different methods of soil exploration for study of soil profiles are:
1. Open excavation
2. Borings
3. Subsurface soundings
4. Geographical methods
1. Open Excavation
A pit, eventually, can be excavated for exploring shallower depths, say of the order of 2 to
5 m, or so. Such a pit can be easily excavated at the proposed construction site, if the soil
has a bit of cohesion, and the soil samples can be lifted from such different depths, besides
making the easy visualization and examination of the different strata. Even undisturbed
soil samples can be lifted from such a pit by a process called chunk sampling.
2. Boring Method
Soil samples can be lifted from deeper depths by drilling bore holes by using mechanical
devices called samplers.The process consists of
Drilling a hole and visually examining the cuttings coming out from different depths
Lifting the soil samples from different depths by using mechanical devices called
samplers.
Methods of boring
(i) Auger boring
(ii) Auger and Shell boring
(iii) Wash boring
(iv) Percussion boring
(v) Rotary boring (Mud rotary drilling)
3. Subsurface Sounding Tests
These tests are carried out to measure the resistance to penetration of a sampling spoon, a
cone or other shaped tools under dynamic or static loading. These tests are used for
exploration of erratic solid profiles for finding depth to bedrock or stratum and to get
approximate indication of the strength and other properties of soil.
Standard Penetration Test (SPT)
Cone penetration test or Dutch cone test
4. Geographical Methods of Soil Exploration
(i) Electrical resistivity method
This method is based on the measurement and recording of changes in the mean resistivity
or apparent specific resistance of various soils. The test is done by driving four metal
spikes to act as electrodes into the ground along a straight line at equal distances. This is
shown in the figure. Direct voltage is applied between the two outer potentiometer
electrodes and then mean for the potential drop between the inner electrodes is calculated.
Mean resistivity (ohm-cm) ρ = 2πDR
Where D= distance between the electrodes (cm)
E= potential drop between outer electrodes (volts)
I= current flowing between outer electrodes (amperes)
R= resistance (ohms) = (E/I)
Resistivity mapping: This method is used to find out the horizontal changes in the sub
soil, the electrodes kept at a constant spacing, are moved as a group along the line of tests.
Resistivity sounding: This method is used to study the vertical changes; the electrode
system is expanded, about a fixed central point by increasing the spacing gradually from
an initial small value to a distance roughly equal to the depth of exploration desired.
(ii) Seismic refraction method
This method is very fast and reliable in establishing profiles of different strata, provided
the deeper layers have increasingly greater density, higher velocities and greater thickness.
Course Teacher
Verified by HOD
MUTHAYAMMAL ENGINEERING COLLEGE
(An Autonomous Institution)
(Approved by AICTE, New Delhi, Accredited by NAAC & Affiliated to Anna University)
Rasipuram - 637 408, Namakkal Dist., Tamil Nadu
L - 02
LECTURE HANDOUTS
CIVIL III / V
Date of Lecture:
Introduction:
Boring methods are widely used for subsurface investigations to collect samples, in almost
all types of soil, for visual inspection or laboratory testing.
There are several boring techniques like auger boring, auger and shell boring, wash
boring, percussion drilling and rotary drilling, that are employed to collect disturbed and
undisturbed samples of soils.
Prerequisite knowledge for Complete understanding and learning of Topic:
Site investigation
Methods of exploration
Test on soil
Detailed content of the Lecture:
These boring methods are selected based on the soil types, the efficiency of boring
technique, types of soil sample (disturbed or undisturbed), and the availability of facility
and accuracy by which soil and groundwater variations can be determined.
Methods of boring
1. Auger boring
2. Auger and Shell boring
3. Wash boring
4. Percussion boring
5. Rotary boring (Mud rotary drilling)
1. Auger Boring
It is a simple and cost-effective boring technique which can be used for almost all types of
soil apart from gravelly soil and rocks. This technique encounters difficulty in gravelly soil
and special drilling bits are needed for rocks.Auger boring is used to collect disturbed soil
specimen. It collects the soil sample from a maximum practical depth of nearly 35m based
on the available time and equipment type.
2. Auger and Shell boring
Cylindrical augers and shells with cutting edge or teeth at Iower end can be used for
making deep borings. Hand operated rigs are used for depths upto 25 m and mechanised
rigs up to 50 m. Augers are suitable for soft to stiff clays, shells for very stiff and hard
clays, and shells or sand pumps for sandy soils. Small boulders, thin soft strata or rock or
cemented gravel can be broken by chisel bits attached to drill rods. The hole usually
requires a casing.
3. Rotary Drilling
Rotary drilling method of boring is suitable for all types of soil including rocks. It is used
to take disturbed as well as undisturbed soil sample. So, it is specifically applicable for stiff
soil layers. The practical depth of sampling is around 70m and greater depth based on the
type of utilized equipment.
Generally, thin-walled tube samplers and various piston samplers are used to collect
undisturbed soil specimen. The diameter of the undisturbed soil sample is around 100 mm
and ranges from 150mm to 200mm for rocks.
4. Wash Boring
Wash boring method is used to collect disturbed and undisturbed samples in almost all
types of soils except rocks. In this technique, portable, cheap, and limited equipment is
used which is an advantage of wash boring. Similar to rotary drilling, thin-walled tube
samplers and piston samplers are used to recover undisturbed soil samples with
minimum 50 mm diameter and maximum 100 mm diameter.
5. Percussion Drilling
It is used for all types of soils and rocks including stiff soils and rocks. Percussion drilling
is used to take disturbed and undisturbed specimen but the quality of undisturbed
samples is not that good because of the heavy blows of the chisel.
Similar to rotary drilling and wash boring, the soil specimen can be taken from a depth of
70m and more based on the utilized equipment. The diameter of disturbed soil samples is
about 100 mm and greater, and obtaining smaller diameter samples would be
uneconomical.
1. Dr.B.C.Punmia, Ashok Kumar Jain, Arun Kumar Jain., Laxmi Publications Pvt Ltd,
Sixteenth Edition, 2005. ( Page no – 862 to 872 )
2. BrajaM. Das., Priciples of Foundation Engineering, Seventh Edition, Cengage Learning,
2015. ( Page no – 77 to 80 )
Course Teacher
Verified by HOD
MUTHAYAMMAL ENGINEERING COLLEGE
(An Autonomous Institution)
(Approved by AICTE, New Delhi, Accredited by NAAC & Affiliated to Anna University)
Rasipuram - 637 408, Namakkal Dist., Tamil Nadu
L - 03
LECTURE HANDOUTS
CIVIL III / V
Date of Lecture:
1. Dr.B.C.Punmia, Ashok Kumar Jain, Arun Kumar Jain., Laxmi Publications Pvt Ltd,
Sixteenth Edition, 2005. ( Page no – 859 to 862 )
2. BrajaM. Das., Priciples of Foundation Engineering, Seventh Edition, Cengage Learning,
2015. ( Page no – 73 to 74 )
Course Teacher
Verified by HOD
MUTHAYAMMAL ENGINEERING COLLEGE
(An Autonomous Institution)
(Approved by AICTE, New Delhi, Accredited by NAAC & Affiliated to Anna University)
Rasipuram - 637 408, Namakkal Dist., Tamil Nadu
L - 04
LECTURE HANDOUTS
CIVIL III / V
Date of Lecture:
Course Teacher
Verified by HOD
MUTHAYAMMAL ENGINEERING COLLEGE
(An Autonomous Institution)
(Approved by AICTE, New Delhi, Accredited by NAAC & Affiliated to Anna University)
Rasipuram - 637 408, Namakkal Dist., Tamil Nadu
L - 05
LECTURE HANDOUTS
CIVIL III / V
Date of Lecture:
Topic of Lecture:Sampling – Methods -Thick, Thin wall samplers, Stationery piston sampler
Introduction:
Soil samples are obtained by
Driving or pushing a sampling tube into the ground.
An open ended cylindrical tube is known as sampling tube.
Prerequisite knowledge for Complete understanding and learning of Topic:
Methods of boring
Site investigation
Depth of boring
Detailed content of the Lecture:
Types of Samples
Un disturbed Soil
Disturbed Soil Samples
Samples
DISTURBED SAMPLES:- Soil samples in which the natural water content or structure gets
modified or destroyed is known as disturbed samples.
NON-REPRESENTATIVE SAMPLES: Mixture of soils from different layers/levelscomplete
disturbance to soil structure and properties can not be used for any test
REPRESENTATIVE SAMPLES: Disturbance to soil structure water content may or may not be
changed no change in mineral constituents suitable for classification and identification tests
UNDISTURBED SAMPLES:- Little or no disturbance to the soil structure natural structure and
properties will be preserved useful for important laboratory tests like shear test, consolidation
test etc.,
Sampling Techniques
Depending upon the mode of operation, the samplers can be classified as
1. Open Drive Sampler(Chunk Sample)
Obtained from open pit
Sampling steps:
During excavation a block of soil is left undisturbed
An open ended box is placed on the block of soil sample
The sample is cut at the base and removed
The open top is sealed using wax and transported to laboratory
This type of samples can be taken at shallow depths of 1 to 2m
2. Shelby Tube Sampler (Thin Wall Sampler)
The sampler is a open end steel tube with a cutting edge
Sampling steps:
The sampler is placed at the bottom of the bore hole
The sampler is pushed into the ground
The sampler pulled out and the sampler with the sample is transporter to the lab.
This type of sampling is suitable in soils having some cohesion.
Not suitable in hard soils and gravels
3. Split Spoon Sampler (Thick Wall Sampler)
This is an open ended cylindrical tube
It consists of
A cutting shoe at the bottom
A barrel (pipe) split longitudinally into two halves
A coupling at the top for connection to drill rods
Sampling steps:
Same as for thin walled open drive sampling.
After the sample is taken the two halves of the tube can be seperated to expose the sample.
4. Stationary Piston Sampler
This consists of:
Sampler tube
Piston
Sampling steps:
Sampler tube with the piston is placed at the bottom of bore hole
The sampler is pushed into the soil keeping the piston at the bottom of the bore hole
Sampler along with the piston is lifted up. Negative pressure is created if the soil tends to
move downwards. This helps to retain the sample
1. Dr.B.C.Punmia, Ashok Kumar Jain, Arun Kumar Jain., Laxmi Publications Pvt Ltd,
Sixteenth Edition, 2005. ( Page no – 864 to 867 )
2. BrajaM. Das., Priciples of Foundation Engineering, Seventh Edition, Cengage Learning,
2015. ( Page no – 81 to 94 )
Course Teacher
Verified by HOD
MUTHAYAMMAL ENGINEERING COLLEGE
(An Autonomous Institution)
(Approved by AICTE, New Delhi, Accredited by NAAC & Affiliated to Anna University)
Rasipuram - 637 408, Namakkal Dist., Tamil Nadu
L - 06
LECTURE HANDOUTS
CIVIL III / V
Date of Lecture:
Test procedure
The test is carried out in a bore hole. The test is carried out at every 0.75m or 1.5m depth
intervals as the bore hole is advanced.
Steps:
1) The bore hole is advanced to the reguired depth
2) The split spoon sampler is attached to drill rods and lowered to the bottom of the bore
hole
3) The split spoon sampler is driven into the soil using a hammer.
Weight of hammer= 65Kg.; the height of fall of hammer = 75cm
4) Number of blows required for penetration of every 15cm is noted.
The sampler is penetrated upto 45cm
5) The number of blows for the last 30cm penetration (15cm to45cm) is recorded as ‘N’
value
6) The split spoon sampler is then withdrawn. The sample is collected for tests in the lab
Corrections to SPT ‘N’ values
The ‘N’ values obtained in SAND soils have to be corrected for:
No correction is applied to N value obtained in cohesive soils.
1. Overburden pressure correction
The overburden pressure increases with depth. For the same relative density of
sand ,the ‘N’ values are under estimated at smaller depths and over estimated at larger
depths. Therefore the observed values, Nobs are corrected to a standard effective
overburden pressure
The corrected N value is given by:
N’ = CN Nobs
2. Correction for dilatancy
The corrected value,Ncor is given by,
Ncor =15+0.5(N’-15)
Static cone penetration test (SCPT)Or Cone penetration test (CPT)
1) A cone with apex angle 60º , base area 10cm2
2) A friction jacket
3) Sounding rod
4) Hand operated or motorized pushing equipment
5) Pressure gauges
Test procedure
The soil resistance to penetration is measured
The cone is pushed and the cone tipresistance, qc is measured
The cone and the friction jacket both are pushed and the total resistance qt is measured
qt - qc = Frictional resistance, fs
A plot of depth Vs penetration resistance is made
1. Dr.B.C.Punmia, Ashok Kumar Jain, Arun Kumar Jain., Laxmi Publications Pvt Ltd,
Sixteenth Edition, 2005. ( Page no – 680 to 683 )
2. BrajaM. Das., Priciples of Foundation Engineering, Seventh Edition, Cengage Learning,
2015. ( Page no – 98 to 116)
Course Teacher
Verified by HOD
MUTHAYAMMAL ENGINEERING COLLEGE
(An Autonomous Institution)
(Approved by AICTE, New Delhi, Accredited by NAAC & Affiliated to Anna University)
Rasipuram - 637 408, Namakkal Dist., Tamil Nadu
L - 07
LECTURE HANDOUTS
CIVIL III / V
Date of Lecture:
Course Teacher
Verified by HOD
MUTHAYAMMAL ENGINEERING COLLEGE
(An Autonomous Institution)
(Approved by AICTE, New Delhi, Accredited by NAAC & Affiliated to Anna University)
Rasipuram - 637 408, Namakkal Dist., Tamil Nadu
L - 08
LECTURE HANDOUTS
CIVIL III / V
Date of Lecture:
Fig.7: The existing dip has not been assessed, as a result, extra
loads are imposed for which the retaining wall has not been designed
4. Bedrock Misinterpretation
Making errors in the interpretation of bedrock is possible. This might occur when borehole
machine reach boulders in boulder clay and consequently bedrock would be assumed
wrongly.This problem could be avoided by drilling higher number of boreholes.
True Soil Profile, Boreholes Reach Boulders Wrong Interpretation of Bedrock due
to Boulders in Clay
5. Improper Interpretation of Strata Formation
This error might encounter when there is a fault in the area and is not examined.
Consequently, strata formation generated would not represent the actual strata.
Course Teacher
Verified by HOD
MUTHAYAMMAL ENGINEERING COLLEGE
(An Autonomous Institution)
(Approved by AICTE, New Delhi, Accredited by NAAC & Affiliated to Anna University)
Rasipuram - 637 408, Namakkal Dist., Tamil Nadu
L - 09
LECTURE HANDOUTS
CIVIL III / V
Date of Lecture:
3 Soft Clay To A Greater Depth 1.Spread Footing For Low & Medium Loading
2. Deep Foundations For Heavy Loadings
4 Loose Sand Raft Foundation
Selection Of Foundation
Video Content / Details of website for further learning (if any):
https://civilblog.org/2016/02/22/how-to-select-a-suitable-type-of-foundation/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_hqSWYxPQq0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=frntXHVXkzI
Important Books/Journals for further learning including the page nos.:
1. Dr.B.C.Punmia, Ashok Kumar Jain, Arun Kumar Jain., Laxmi Publications Pvt Ltd,
Sixteenth Edition, 2005. ( Page no – 680 to 683 )
2. BrajaM. Das., Priciples of Foundation Engineering, Seventh Edition, Cengage Learning,
2015. ( Page no –133 to 135 )
Course Teacher
Verified by HOD
MUTHAYAMMAL ENGINEERING COLLEGE
(An Autonomous Institution)
(Approved by AICTE, New Delhi, Accredited by NAAC & Affiliated to Anna University)
Rasipuram - 637 408, Namakkal Dist., Tamil Nadu
L - 10
LECTURE HANDOUTS
CIVIL III / V
Date of Lecture:
Topic of Lecture:Introduction
Introduction:
A foundation transfers the loads from the superstructure to the soil safely. The
foundations are designed such that:
The soil does not fail in shear and
Settlement is within the safe limits
Prerequisite knowledge for Complete understanding and learning of Topic:
Site investigation
Methods of exploration
Type of soil
Detailed content of the Lecture:
Shallow foundation (Df ≤ B)
The depth of foundation is small
(Df /B) ≤ 1 (for shallow foundation)
1<(Df /B) ≤ 15 (for moderate shallow foundation)
Construction in open excavations
Types of shallow foundation
Isolated footing, square , rectangular or circular
Continuous or strip or wall footing
Combined footing - rectangular or trapezoidal
Strap footing
Raft / mat foundation
1. SPREAD FOOTING:
A spread footing also called as isolated footing, pad footing and individual footing is
provided to support an individual column.
A spread footing is circular, square or rectangular slab of uniform thickness.
Sometimes, it is stepped or haunched to spread the load over a large area.
2. CONTINUOUS FOOTING:
A strip footing is provided for a load-bearing wall.
A strip footing is also provided for a row of columns which are so closely spaced that their
spread footings overlap or nearly touch each other.
In such a case, it is more economical to provide a strip footing than to provide a number
of spread footings in one line.
A strip footing is also known as continuous footing.
3. COMBINED FOOTING:
A combined footing supports two columns.
It is used when the two columns are so close to each other that their individual footings
would overlap.
A combined footing is also provided when the property line is so close to one column that
a spread footing would be eccentrically loaded when kept entirely within the property
line.
By combining it with that of an interior column, the load is evenly distributed. A
combined footing may be rectangular or trapezoidal in plan.
4.STRAP FOOTING:
A strap (or cantilever) footing consists of two isolated footings connected with a structural
strap.
The strap connects the two footings such that they behave as one unit.
The strap is designed as a rigid beam. The individual footings are so designed that their
combined line of action passes through the resultant of the total load.
A strap footing is more economical than a combined footing when the allowable soil
pressure is relatively high and the distance between the columns is large.
5. RAFT FOOTING:
A mat or raft foundation is a large slab supporting a number of columns and walls under
the entire structure or a large part of the structure.
A mat is required when the allowable soil pressure is low or where the columns and walls
are so close that individual footings would overlap or nearly touch each other.
Mat foundations are useful in reducing the differential settlements on non-homogeneous
soils or where there is a large variation in the loads on individual columns.
Course Teacher
Verified by HOD
MUTHAYAMMAL ENGINEERING COLLEGE
(An Autonomous Institution)
(Approved by AICTE, New Delhi, Accredited by NAAC & Affiliated to Anna University)
Rasipuram - 637 408, Namakkal Dist., Tamil Nadu
L - 11
LECTURE HANDOUTS
CIVIL III / V
Date of Lecture:
(b) For footing in clay soils, a line drawn between the lower adjacent edge of the upper
footing and upper adjacent edge of lower footing should not have a slope steeper than 2H:
1 V as shown in figure.
Depth of foundation:
At a depth where the soil is adequately strong
Minimum depth = 50cm below ground level
Below the depth of scour in foundations in river beds
Below the zone of moisture change i.e ,below the zone of seasonal variation of water
content
Below the zone of frost heave in areas where temperature goes below zero.
General factors to be considered for determining depth of foundation are:
Load applied from structure to the foundation
Bearing capacity of soil
Depth of water level below the ground surface
Types of soil and depth of layers in case of layered soil
Depth of adjacent foundation
Rankine’s formula provides the guidance on minimum depth of foundation based on
bearing capacity of soil.
d = (q/ Ø ){(1 - sinφ )/(1 + sinφ )}2
Where Ø is the angle of repose
Video Content / Details of website for further learning (if any):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Dt62PqHZfM&t=240s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8sqSjToVes4
Important Books/Journals for further learning including the page nos.:
Course Teacher
Verified by HOD
MUTHAYAMMAL ENGINEERING COLLEGE
(An Autonomous Institution)
(Approved by AICTE, New Delhi, Accredited by NAAC & Affiliated to Anna University)
Rasipuram - 637 408, Namakkal Dist., Tamil Nadu
L - 12
LECTURE HANDOUTS
CIVIL III / V
Date of Lecture:
1. Dr.B.C.Punmia, Ashok Kumar Jain, Arun Kumar Jain., Laxmi Publications Pvt Ltd,
Sixteenth Edition, 2005. ( Page no – 641 to 643 )
2. BrajaM. Das., Priciples of Foundation Engineering, Seventh Edition, Cengage Learning,
2015. ( Page no –133 to 136 )
Course Teacher
Verified by HOD
MUTHAYAMMAL ENGINEERING COLLEGE
(An Autonomous Institution)
(Approved by AICTE, New Delhi, Accredited by NAAC & Affiliated to Anna University)
Rasipuram - 637 408, Namakkal Dist., Tamil Nadu
L - 13
LECTURE HANDOUTS
CIVIL III / V
Date of Lecture:
Introduction:
In geotechnical engineering, bearing capacity is the capacity of soil to support
the loads applied to the ground. The bearing capacity of soil is the maximum average
contact pressure between the foundation and the soil which should not
produce shear failure in the soil.
Ultimate bearing capacity (qf) is the theoretical maximum pressure which can be
supported without failure; allowable bearing capacity (qa) is the ultimate bearing capacity
divided by a factor of safety. Sometimes, on soft soil sites, large settlements may occur
under loaded foundations without actual shear failure occurring; in such cases, the
allowable bearing capacity is based on the maximum allowable settlement.
Prerequisite knowledge for Complete understanding and learning of Topic:
Types of shallow foundation
Modes of failure
Bearing capacity
Detailed content of the Lecture:
Course Teacher
Verified by HOD
MUTHAYAMMAL ENGINEERING COLLEGE
(An Autonomous Institution)
(Approved by AICTE, New Delhi, Accredited by NAAC & Affiliated to Anna University)
Rasipuram - 637 408, Namakkal Dist., Tamil Nadu
L - 14
LECTURE HANDOUTS
CIVIL III / V
Date of Lecture:
Problem 2: Obtain the gross and net ultimate bearing capacity of a square footing of side 2m
resting on sand having ø = 35º. The footing is placed at a depth of 1.5m below G.L. the soil above
is C L and has a unit weight of 18 kN/m2 and the sand below base has γt of 20 kN/m3 .
For ø= 35º,
Nq = 40 ,
Nγ = 45
qugross = γ Df Nq +0.4 γ B Nγ.
qugross=18 * 1.5* 40 +0.4 * 20 * 2 *45
qugross=1080 + 720
qugross=1800 kN/m2
qunet = γ Df (Nq – 1) + 0.4γB Nγ.
qunet = 18 * 1.5 * 39 + 0.4 * 20 * 2* 45 = 1773 kN/m2
Video Content / Details of website for further learning (if any):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=86jDOqHw7So
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y6BH4a3NFhU
Important Books/Journals for further learning including the page nos.:
Course Teacher
Verified by HOD
MUTHAYAMMAL ENGINEERING COLLEGE
(An Autonomous Institution)
(Approved by AICTE, New Delhi, Accredited by NAAC & Affiliated to Anna University)
Rasipuram - 637 408, Namakkal Dist., Tamil Nadu
L - 15
LECTURE HANDOUTS
CIVIL III / V
Date of Lecture:
Topic of Lecture:Bearing capacity from in-situ tests (SPT, SCPT and plate load)
Introduction:
Plate load test is performed to determine the ultimate load bearing capacity of soil over
the in-situ conditions.The plate load test is mandatory in case of designing foundation
over the sandy and clayey soil.
This test gives the highest rate of accuracy determining the safe bearing capacity of of soil
in case of shallow foundations.This test determines the Ultimate Bearing capacity of Soil,
Settlement of foundation & Allowable bearing pressure of soil.
Prerequisite knowledge for Complete understanding and learning of Topic:
Bearing capacity of soil
Ultimate load on soil
Type of soil
Detailed content of the Lecture:
This test gives the highest rate of accuracy determining the safe bearing capacity of of soil
in case of shallow foundations.This test determines the Ultimate Bearing capacity of Soil,
Settlement of foundation & Allowable bearing pressure of soil.
Plate load test is suitable for Cohesionless soil as in case of Cohesion soil the settlement
takes place in longer duration which this test is not suitable.
Then the settlement per each load increment is recorded to calculate the bearing capacity
of the soil.
Varieties in Plate load test and their durations:-
1.Gravity load test
In this type of method, a rigid platform is utilized to transfer loads through loading of
sandbags or concrete blocks. These blocks and sandbags act as a dead weight, and whole
arrangement rests upon vertical columns.
The hydraulic jack is provided in between the rigid plate and top of the column to transfer
the load properly.
2.Reaction truss method
In this method, the reaction generated through jack is borne by reaction truss installed
over it.
The undesirable movement of truss is controlled by soil anchors or nails fixed into the soil
with the help of hammers.The most commonly observed truss is made of mild steel
sections.In order to curb later movement, truss is locked with guy ropes.
1. Dr.B.C.Punmia, Ashok Kumar Jain, Arun Kumar Jain., Laxmi Publications Pvt Ltd,
Sixteenth Edition, 2005. ( Page no – 673 to 679 )
2. Dr.S.Arunachalam., Foundation Engineering, Laxmi Publications Pvt Ltd, Eigth Edition,
2017. ( Page no – 2.22 to 2.24 )
Course Teacher
Verified by HOD
MUTHAYAMMAL ENGINEERING COLLEGE
(An Autonomous Institution)
(Approved by AICTE, New Delhi, Accredited by NAAC & Affiliated to Anna University)
Rasipuram - 637 408, Namakkal Dist., Tamil Nadu
L - 16
LECTURE HANDOUTS
CIVIL III / V
Date of Lecture:
Course Teacher
Verified by HOD
MUTHAYAMMAL ENGINEERING COLLEGE
(An Autonomous Institution)
(Approved by AICTE, New Delhi, Accredited by NAAC & Affiliated to Anna University)
Rasipuram - 637 408, Namakkal Dist., Tamil Nadu
L - 17
LECTURE HANDOUTS
CIVIL III / V
Date of Lecture:
Settlement
Allowble settlement:
The allowable settlement is defined as the acceptable amount of settlement of the structure
and it usually includes a factor of safety.
It is the maximum settlement beyond which the foundation fails due to excessive
settlement.
It’s permits a maximum allowable settlement of 40mm for isolated foundations on sand
and 65mm for those on clay.
For raft foundations on sand 40mm to 65mm and that on clay 65mm to 100mm.
Average settlement ranging from 20 mm to 300 mm have been permitted in engineering
practice, depending on the type of soil, structure, construction type.
According to IS 1904 permits tolerable settlement S as under,
Sand clay
Problem:The settlement of plate of size 300mm on sand for a particular loading intensity is
12.8mm. Find the settlement of foundation of size 1.5m on the same sand for the same loading
intensity.
Given Data
Size of plate = 300mm
Load intensity settlement = 12.8mm
Foundation width = 1.5m
Solution
𝐵𝑓 (𝐵𝑝 + 0.3)
Settlement (Sf) = Sp [ ]2
𝐵𝑓 (𝐵𝑝 + 0.3)
1.5(0.3+ 0.3) 2
(Sf) = 12.8 [ ]
0.3(1.5+ 0.3)
(Sf) = 35.6mm
Video Content / Details of website for further learning (if any):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=58Tz6L9-bo8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w_4f3iLiulo
Important Books/Journals for further learning including the page nos.:
1. Dr.B.C.Punmia, Ashok Kumar Jain, Arun Kumar Jain., Laxmi Publications Pvt Ltd,
Sixteenth Edition, 2005. ( Page no – 678 to 679 )
2. BrajaM. Das., Priciples of Foundation Engineering, Seventh Edition, Cengage Learning,
2015. ( Page no –273 to 277 )
Course Teacher
Verified by HOD
MUTHAYAMMAL ENGINEERING COLLEGE
(An Autonomous Institution)
(Approved by AICTE, New Delhi, Accredited by NAAC & Affiliated to Anna University)
Rasipuram - 637 408, Namakkal Dist., Tamil Nadu
L - 18
LECTURE HANDOUTS
CIVIL III / V
Date of Lecture:
1. Dr.B.C.Punmia, Ashok Kumar Jain, Arun Kumar Jain., Laxmi Publications Pvt Ltd,
Sixteenth Edition, 2005. ( Page no – 344 to 347 )
2. BrajaM. Das., Priciples of Foundation Engineering, Seventh Edition, Cengage Learning,
2015. ( Page no – 263 to 267 )
Course Teacher
Verified by HOD
MUTHAYAMMAL ENGINEERING COLLEGE
(An Autonomous Institution)
(Approved by AICTE, New Delhi, Accredited by NAAC & Affiliated to Anna University)
Rasipuram - 637 408, Namakkal Dist., Tamil Nadu
L - 19
LECTURE HANDOUTS
CIVIL III / V
Date of Lecture:
Introduction:
Footing is one of the most important parts of a structure which transfers loads of a
structure to the underlying soil. The selection of suitable type of footing generally depends
on the following factors:
1. The depth of the soil at which safe bearing strata exists.
2. The type and condition of soil.
3. The type of the superstructure.
Prerequisite knowledge for Complete understanding and learning of Topic:
Types of foundation
Soil condition
Methods of exploration
Detailed content of the Lecture:
1. Strip footing:
It is a component of shallow foundation which distributes the weight of a load bearing
wall across the area of the ground. It is also known as wall footing.
2. Spread Footing:
As the name suggests, a spread is given under the base of the foundation so that the load
of the structure is distributed on wide area of the soil in such a way that the safe bearing
capacity of the soil is not exceeded.
3. Isolated Footings:
It is square, circular or individually rectangular slab of uniform thickness, provided under
each column.
4. Stepped Footings:
The main purpose of using stepped footing is to keep the metal columns away from direct
contact with soil to save them from corrosive effect. They are used to carry the load of
metal columns and transmit this load to the below ground.
5. Combined Footings:
When two or more columns are supported by a footing it is called combined footing. This
footing may be of rectangular or trapezoidal in plan. Combined footing is provided under
following situations.
When columns are close to each other and their individual footings overlap.
Soil having low bearing capacity and requires more area under individual footing.
The column end is situated near the property line and the footing can not be
extended.
6. Strap Footing:
In such footing, the outer and inner column is connected by a strap beam, does not
transfer any load to the soil. The individual footing areas of the columns are so arranged
that the C.G of the combined loads of the two columns pass through the C.G of the two
footing areas. Once this criterion is achieved, the pressure distribution below each
individual footing will be uniform.
7. Mat Foundation:
This foundation covers the entire area under the structure. This foundation has only RCC
slab covering the whole area or slab and beam together. Mat foundation is adopted when
heavy structures are to be constructed on soft made-up ground or marshy sites with
uncertain behavior. Mat foundation is also known as raft foundation.
8. Sloped Footing:
The footings having sloping top or side faces are known as sloped footings. This type of
footing is useful in the construction of formwork.
Course Teacher
Verified by HOD
MUTHAYAMMAL ENGINEERING COLLEGE
(An Autonomous Institution)
(Approved by AICTE, New Delhi, Accredited by NAAC & Affiliated to Anna University)
Rasipuram - 637 408, Namakkal Dist., Tamil Nadu
L - 20
LECTURE HANDOUTS
CIVIL III / V
Date of Lecture:
Introduction:
Contact pressure is the actual pressure transmitted from the foundation to the soil. On the
assumption that the vertical settlement of the foundation is uniform, it is found from the
elastic theory that the stress intensity at the edges of a foundation on cohesive soils is
infinite.
Prerequisite knowledge for Complete understanding and learning of Topic:
Types of footing
Types of soil
Presuure on the soil
Detailed content of the Lecture:
On the underside of the footing, the soil reaction produce a upward pressure which is
assumed uniform in deriving different relationship for soil-structure interaction problem.
This pressure is called contact pressure. But actually a footing are not flexible as well as
contact pressure is not uniform, necessitating more investigation for actual contact
pressure distribution.
The contact pressure is the ratio of the normal load to the true contact area, which is the
sum of the front and rear areas. It may be called the scratch hardness only in the case of
plastic contact.
The actual distribution of contact pressure depends upon a number of factors such as
1) Elastic properties of footing
2) Elastic properties of soil
3) Thickness of footing
Contact Pressure On Saturated Clay
Flexible Footing When a footing is flexible, it deforms into shape of bowel, with the
maximum deflection at the center.
The contact pressure distribution is uniform.Rigid FootingWhen a footing is rigid, the
settlement is uniform.
The contact pressure distribution is minimum at the center and the maximum at the edges.
The stresses at the edges in real soils can not be infinite as theoretically determined for an
elastic mass. In real soils, beyond a certain limiting value of stress, the plastic flow
occursand the pressure becomes finite.
Contact pressure on sand
Flexible footingIn this case, the edges of flexible footing undergo a large settlement than at
the centre.
The soil at the centre is confined and, therefore, has a high modulus of elasticity and
deflects less for the same contact pressure.
The contact pressure is uniform. Rigid footingIf the footing is rigid, the settlement is
uniform.
The contact pressure increases from zero at the edges to a maximum at the centre. The soil,
being unconfined at edges, has low modulus of elasticity.
However, if the footing is embedded, there would be finite contact pressure at edges.
Thus it is observed that the contact pressure distribution for flexible footing is uniform for
both clay and sand.
The contact pressure for rigid footing is maximum at the edges for footing on clay, but for
rigid footings on sand, it is minimum at the edges
Consequence of assuming uniformity in pressure
For convenience, the contact pressure is assumed to be uniform for all types of footings
and all types of soils if load is symmetric.
The above assumption of uniform pressure distribution will result in a slightly unsafe
design for rigid footing on clays, as the maximum bending moment at centre is
underestimated.
It will give a conservative design for rigid footings on sandy (cohessionless) soils, as the
maximum bending moment is overestimated. However, at the ultimate stage just before
failure, the soil behaves as an elasto-plastic material ( and not an elastic material) and the
contact pressure is uniform and the assumption is justified at the ultimate stage.
Video Content / Details of website for further learning (if any):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=34HONH40vY0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Z5yC67h5Ys
Important Books/Journals for further learning including the page nos.:
Course Teacher
Verified by HOD
MUTHAYAMMAL ENGINEERING COLLEGE
(An Autonomous Institution)
(Approved by AICTE, New Delhi, Accredited by NAAC & Affiliated to Anna University)
Rasipuram - 637 408, Namakkal Dist., Tamil Nadu
L - 21
LECTURE HANDOUTS
CIVIL III / V
Date of Lecture:
for the column which has the largest live load to dead load ratio.
2. Calculate the service load for the same column:
where C is ½ for ordinary buildings and ¾ for warehouses and storage floors.
3. Decide the storage floor’s safe bearingpressure:
Qd = design pressure
for all footings except the one with the lowest live load to dead load ratio.
qd = Lc / A
5. Computetheareaoffootingsupportingthecolumnwiththelowestliveloadtodeadload ratio:
A = (Ll+d )/ qs
6. Decide the length and width of footing and check for permissible settlement and alter
width if needed.
Video Content / Details of website for further learning (if any):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E5b6UlV7g44
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h2LSftATAZw&t=293s
Important Books/Journals for further learning including the page nos.:
Course Teacher
Verified by HOD
MUTHAYAMMAL ENGINEERING COLLEGE
(An Autonomous Institution)
(Approved by AICTE, New Delhi, Accredited by NAAC & Affiliated to Anna University)
Rasipuram - 637 408, Namakkal Dist., Tamil Nadu
L - 22
LECTURE HANDOUTS
CIVIL III / V
Date of Lecture:
Course Teacher
Verified by HOD
MUTHAYAMMAL ENGINEERING COLLEGE
(An Autonomous Institution)
(Approved by AICTE, New Delhi, Accredited by NAAC & Affiliated to Anna University)
Rasipuram - 637 408, Namakkal Dist., Tamil Nadu
L - 23
LECTURE HANDOUTS
CIVIL III / V
Date of Lecture:
Course Teacher
Verified by HOD
MUTHAYAMMAL ENGINEERING COLLEGE
(An Autonomous Institution)
(Approved by AICTE, New Delhi, Accredited by NAAC & Affiliated to Anna University)
Rasipuram - 637 408, Namakkal Dist., Tamil Nadu
L - 24
LECTURE HANDOUTS
CIVIL III / V
Date of Lecture:
(d) BOXSTRUCTURES:
In this type of mat foundation, a box structure is provided in which the basement walls
acts as a stiffeners for the mat. Boxes may be made of cellular construction or rigid
frame consisting of slabs and basement walls. This type of mat foundation can resist
very high bendingstresses.
(e) MATS PLACED ONPILES:
The mat is supported on the piles in this type of construction. This type of mat is used
where the soil is highly compressible and the water table is high. This method of
construction reduces the settlement and also controls buoyancy.
ADVANTAGES:
1. The foundation and ground floor slab is poured at the same time so which reduces our
construction time and material.
2. It requires less excavation.
3. It is provided where the shallow foundation is possible but the condition of the soil is
poor.
4. Reduces the cost of constructing a floor slab (But not fully economical).
5. It helps in the transferring of loads over a wide area.
6. It shows good resistance and cannot slide during the flood.
7. We can handle more heavy loads as compared to other types of foundations.
DISADVANTAGES:
1. Raft foundation requires a large quantity of steel and concrete.
2. This foundation is costly (Volume of footing was increasing).
3. It is not suitable and used for domestic home construction.
4. Special measurement is needed in case of concentrated loads.
5. In the mat foundation, skilled laborers are required.
Course Teacher
Verified by HOD
MUTHAYAMMAL ENGINEERING COLLEGE
(An Autonomous Institution)
(Approved by AICTE, New Delhi, Accredited by NAAC & Affiliated to Anna University)
Rasipuram - 637 408, Namakkal Dist., Tamil Nadu
L - 25
LECTURE HANDOUTS
CIVIL III / V
Date of Lecture:
Course Teacher
Verified by HOD
MUTHAYAMMAL ENGINEERING COLLEGE
(An Autonomous Institution)
(Approved by AICTE, New Delhi, Accredited by NAAC & Affiliated to Anna University)
Rasipuram - 637 408, Namakkal Dist., Tamil Nadu
L - 26
LECTURE HANDOUTS
CIVIL III / V
Date of Lecture:
Course Teacher
Verified by HOD
MUTHAYAMMAL ENGINEERING COLLEGE
(An Autonomous Institution)
(Approved by AICTE, New Delhi, Accredited by NAAC & Affiliated to Anna University)
Rasipuram - 637 408, Namakkal Dist., Tamil Nadu
L - 27
LECTURE HANDOUTS
CIVIL III / V
Date of Lecture:
Course Teacher
Verified by HOD
MUTHAYAMMAL ENGINEERING COLLEGE
(An Autonomous Institution)
(Approved by AICTE, New Delhi, Accredited by NAAC & Affiliated to Anna University)
Rasipuram - 637 408, Namakkal Dist., Tamil Nadu
L - 28
LECTURE HANDOUTS
CIVIL III / V
Date of Lecture:
1. Dr.B.C.Punmia, Ashok Kumar Jain, Arun Kumar Jain., Laxmi Publications Pvt Ltd,
Sixteenth Edition, 2005. ( Page no – 727 to 729 )
2. BrajaM. Das., Priciples of Foundation Engineering, Seventh Edition, Cengage Learning,
2015. ( Page no – 535 to 545 )
Course Teacher
Verified by HOD
MUTHAYAMMAL ENGINEERING COLLEGE
(An Autonomous Institution)
(Approved by AICTE, New Delhi, Accredited by NAAC & Affiliated to Anna University)
Rasipuram - 637 408, Namakkal Dist., Tamil Nadu
L - 29
LECTURE HANDOUTS
CIVIL III / V
Date of Lecture:
Course Teacher
Verified by HOD
MUTHAYAMMAL ENGINEERING COLLEGE
(An Autonomous Institution)
(Approved by AICTE, New Delhi, Accredited by NAAC & Affiliated to Anna University)
Rasipuram - 637 408, Namakkal Dist., Tamil Nadu
L - 30
LECTURE HANDOUTS
CIVIL III / V
Date of Lecture:
Topic of Lecture:Carrying capacity of single pile in granular and cohesive soil – static formula –
dynamic formulae (Engineering news and Hileys) – Capacity from insitu tests (SPT and SCPT)
Introduction:
The ultimate load carrying capacity, or ultimate bearing capacity, or the ultimate bearing
resistance Qt of a pile is defined as the maximum load which can be carried by a pile, and at
which the pile continues to sink without further increase ofload.
The allowable load Qa is the safe load which the pile can carry safely and is determined on
the basis of :
Ultimate bearing resistance divided by suitablefactor ofsafety,
The permissiblesettlement,Overall stability of thepile-foundation.
Prerequisite knowledge for Complete understanding and learning of Topic:
Types of foundation
Factors influencing the selection of pile
Types of pile foundation
Detailed content of the Lecture:
The load carrying capacity of a pile can be determined by the following methods
Dynamicformulae
Staticformulae
Pile loadtests
Penetrationtests
STATICFORMULAE
The static formulae arc based on assumption that the ultimate bearing capacity Qf of a pile isthe
sum of the total ultimate skin friction R, and total ultimate point or end hearing resistance Rp:
Q = Rf + RPOrQf = As. rf+ Ap.rr
Where
As= surface area of pile which the s-kin friction acts
Ap = area of cross-section of pile on which hearing resistance acts. For tapered piles, A may be
taken as the cross-sectional area at the lower one third of the embedded length.
rf =average skin friction
RP = unit point or toe resistance
A factor of safety of 3 may he adopted for finding the allowableload.
(i) For cohesive soil:
For the pile in cohesive soil, point bearing is generally neglected for individual pile
action, since it is negligible as compared to frictional resistance. The unit skin friction
may be taken equal to the shear strength of (he soil :
rf= c = qu / 2
rp = c . Nc = 9c Qp = c Af+ 9c .Ap
(ii) For noncohesive soil:
rf= K tanø ( Ýz + q )
Video Content / Details of website for further learning (if any):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hBNk9y_Yf8Ehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZwQI0t8
ITzk&list=TLPQMjUwOTIwMjAo-49qpso-5Q&index=4
Important Books/Journals for further learning including the page nos.:
1. Dr.B.C.Punmia, Ashok Kumar Jain, Arun Kumar Jain., Laxmi Publications Pvt Ltd,
Sixteenth Edition, 2005. ( Page no – 732 to 733 )
2. BrajaM. Das., Priciples of Foundation Engineering, Seventh Edition, Cengage Learning,
2015. ( Page no – 546 to 567 )
Course Teacher
Verified by HOD
MUTHAYAMMAL ENGINEERING COLLEGE
(An Autonomous Institution)
(Approved by AICTE, New Delhi, Accredited by NAAC & Affiliated to Anna University)
Rasipuram - 637 408, Namakkal Dist., Tamil Nadu
L - 31
LECTURE HANDOUTS
CIVIL III / V
Date of Lecture:
Topic of Lecture:Carrying capacity of single pile in granular and cohesive soil – static formula –
dynamic formulae (Engineering news and Hileys) – Capacity from insitu tests (SPT and SCPT)
Introduction:
DYNAMIC FORMULA
When a pile hammer hits the pile, the total driving energy is equal to the weightof
hammer times the height of drop or stroke.
In addition to this, in the case of double acting hammers, some energy is alsoimpacted by
the steam pressure during the return stroke.
The total downward energy is consumed by the work done in penetrating the pileand by
certain losses.
The various dynamic formulae are essentially based on this assumption. It is alsoassumed
that soil resistance of dynamic penetration of pile is the same as to thepenetration of pile
under static or sustained loading.
Prerequisite knowledge for Complete understanding and learning of Topic:
Types of foundation
Factors influencing the selection of pile
Types of pile foundation
Detailed content of the Lecture:
Following are some of the commonly used dynamic formulae
(1) Engineering News formula. The Engineering News formula was proposed by A.M.
Wellington (1818) in the following general form:
Where,
Qa= allowable load
W = weight of Hammer
H = height of fall
F = factor of safety =6
S = final set (penetration) per blow, usually taken as average penetration, cm per blow for
the last 5 blows of a drop hammer, or 20 blows of a steam hammer.
C = empirical constant
Denoting W in kg, H in cm, S in cm, and
C = 2.5 cm for drop hammer and
C = 0.25 cm for single and double acting hammers,
The above formula reduces to the following forms: Drop hammers:
Qa= WH / [ 6 ( S + 2.5 ) ]
Single acting steam hammers: Qa= WH / [ 6 ( S +0.25 ) ]
Double acting steam hammers:
Qa = [ ( W + ap ) H ] / [ 6 ( S +0.25 ) ]
Where, a = effective area of piston P = mean effective steam pressure
R = Whn / (s + c / 2)
Where
R = Ultimate driving resistance in ton W = Mass of Ram in ton
h = Height of free fall in cm considered at 80% for winch operated drop
n = Efficiency of the blow representing ratio of energy after impact to striking energy of
ram
s = Average final set per blow in cm
c = Average sum of temporary elastic compression
Applying the factor of safety, the safe load for the pile is then calculated. Comments about
the use of dynamic formulae
Dynamic formulae are best suited to coarse grained soils for which the shearstrength is
independent of rate of loading, because they allow no developmentof excess pore pressure
around the pile during driving if saturated ordry.
The great objection to any of the pile driving formulae is the uncertainty aboutthe
relationship between the dynamic and static resistance ofsoil.
In case of submerged loose uniform fine sands, impact of driving maycause
Liquefaction of soil, thus showing much less resistance than that which willoccur under a
static load.
Similarly, very dense saturated fine sand may show an increased drivingresistance which
decreases withtime.
For clays, the dynamic formulae are valueless because the skin frictiondeveloped in clay
during driving is very much less (due to change in soilstructure from flocculent to
disperse or due to thyrotrophic effect) than whichoccurs after a period oftime.
Also, the point resistance is much more at the time 0 driving because of porepressure
developed in clay, which reduces later on when the porepressure dissipate.
Dynamic formulae give no indication about probable future settlement ortemporary
changes in soilstructure.
The formulae do not take into account the reduced bearing capacity of pilewhen in a
group.
Law of impact used for determining energy loss is not strictly valid for pilessubjected to
restraining influence of the surroundingsoil.
In Engineering News formula, the weight of the pile and hence its inertiaeffect is
neglected.Energy losses due to vibrations, heat and damage so dolly or packing are
notaccounted for.
In Hiley’s formula, a number of constants are involved, which are difficultto determine.
Video Content / Details of website for further learning (if any):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WuqQISU7vsQ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c7NxX0h7SKs
Important Books/Journals for further learning including the page nos.:
1. Dr.B.C.Punmia, Ashok Kumar Jain, Arun Kumar Jain., Laxmi Publications Pvt Ltd,
Sixteenth Edition, 2005. ( Page no – 732 to 733 )
2. BrajaM. Das., Priciples of Foundation Engineering, Seventh Edition, Cengage Learning,
2015. ( Page no – 551 to 567 )
Course Teacher
Verified by HOD
MUTHAYAMMAL ENGINEERING COLLEGE
(An Autonomous Institution)
(Approved by AICTE, New Delhi, Accredited by NAAC & Affiliated to Anna University)
Rasipuram - 637 408, Namakkal Dist., Tamil Nadu
L - 32
LECTURE HANDOUTS
CIVIL III / V
Date of Lecture:
Introduction:
Negative skin friction is usually a downward shear drag acting on a pile or pile group due
to downward sinking of surrounding soil relative to the piles. This shear drag movements
are expected to occur when a segment of the pile penetrates a compressible soil stratum
that can consolidate. Downward drag may be caused by
Placement of fill on compressible soils, lowering of the groundwater table.
Placement of fill on Under-consolidated natural or compacted soils.
Prerequisite knowledge for Complete understanding and learning of Topic:
Dynamic formulae
Capacity from insitu tests
Types of pile foundation
Detailed content of the Lecture:
These situations in the site can cause the compressible soils surrounding the piles to
consolidate. When the tip of pile is bearing in a relatively stiff stratum, the upper
compressible soil will move down relative to the pile this will induce a drag load on the
pile/pile group. This induced drag load can be quite large and it should be added to the
design load for assessing the stresses in the pile.
Vesic found that a relative downward drop of as slight as 15mm of the soil with respect to
the pile may be ample to mobilize full negative skin friction. Though the geotechnical
capacity of the pile is unaffected by down-drag, it does serve to increase the stresses
&increase settlement in the pile/pile cap. It changes the axial force distribution pattern
along the pile shaft. From geotechnical point of view, it is a Service State problem.
Course Teacher
Verified by HOD
MUTHAYAMMAL ENGINEERING COLLEGE
(An Autonomous Institution)
(Approved by AICTE, New Delhi, Accredited by NAAC & Affiliated to Anna University)
Rasipuram - 637 408, Namakkal Dist., Tamil Nadu
L - 33
LECTURE HANDOUTS
CIVIL III / V
Date of Lecture:
Topic of Lecture:Group capacity and efficiency (Feld’s rule, Converse – Labarra rule and block
failure)
Introduction:
Capacity of pile group is the sum of the individual capacities of piles, but it is influenced
by the spacing between the piles. Piles are driven generally in groups in regular pattern to
support the structural loads. The structural load is applied to the pile cap that distributes
the load to individual piles.
If piles are spaced sufficient distance apart, then the capacity of pile group is the sum of
the individual capacities of piles. However, if the spacing between piles is too close, the
zones of stress around the pile will overlap and the ultimate load of the group is less than
the sum of the individual pile capacities especially in the case of friction piles, where the
efficiency of pile group is much less.
Prerequisite knowledge for Complete understanding and learning of Topic:
Dynamic formulae
Capacity from insitu tests
Types of pile foundation
Negative skin friction
Detailed content of the Lecture:
Capacity of Pile Group
Group action of piles is evaluated by considering the piles to fail as a unit around the
perimeter of the group. Both end bearing and friction piles are considered in evaluating
the group capacity.
End bearing pile is evaluated by considering the area enclosed by the perimeter of piles as
the area of footing located at a depth corresponding to the elevation of pile tips.
The friction component of pile support is evaluated by considering the friction that can be
mobilized around the perimeter of the pile group over the length of the piles as shown in
figure below:
Thus, the pile group efficiency is equal to the ratio of the average load per pile in the
group at which the failure occurs to the ultimate load of a comparable single pile.
Efficiency of a pile group can also be obtained by using Converse – Labarre formula:
in degrees
d = diameter of pile end
s = spacing of piles.
Generally center to center spacing between piles in a group is kept between 2.5 d and 3.5d
where d is the diameter of the pile.
Video Content / Details of website for further learning (if any):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9gm4RgCzM-0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9GMBpZZtjXM
Important Books/Journals for further learning including the page nos.:
1. Dr.B.C.Punmia, Ashok Kumar Jain, Arun Kumar Jain., Laxmi Publications Pvt Ltd,
Sixteenth Edition, 2005. ( Page no – 737 to 740 )
2. BrajaM. Das., Priciples of Foundation Engineering, Seventh Edition, Cengage Learning,
2015. ( Page no –617 to 626 )
Course Teacher
Verified by HOD
MUTHAYAMMAL ENGINEERING COLLEGE
(An Autonomous Institution)
(Approved by AICTE, New Delhi, Accredited by NAAC & Affiliated to Anna University)
Rasipuram - 637 408, Namakkal Dist., Tamil Nadu
L - 34
LECTURE HANDOUTS
CIVIL III / V
Date of Lecture:
Introduction:
It may often be required to use more than one pile below a column, depending on the
column load and the load capacity of a single pile. Usually, driven piles should be provided
in groups and a single pile should not be used.
This is because the pile may move laterally during the driving operation, resulting in the
eccentricity of the load, causing additional bending stresses in the pile, decreasing both the
structural capacity and the soil resistance capacity.
Prerequisite knowledge for Complete understanding and learning of Topic:
Dynamic formulae
Capacity from insitu tests
Types of pile foundation
Negative skin friction
Detailed content of the Lecture:
The load capacity of a pile group may not be equal to the sum of the load capacity of the
individual piles in the group due to the following reasons:
1. When piles are used in a group at close spacing, the pressure bulbs of individual piles may
overlap, causing more stress in the overlapping soil zones. This causes a reduction in the
load capacity.
2. When piles are driven in loose- to medium-dense cohesionless soils, it may cause
densification of the soil, increasing the load capacity more than the estimated load capacity.
The efficiency of the pile group is defined as –
where Qug is the ultimate load capacity of the pile group, Qu is the ultimate load capacity of
the individual pile, and N is the number of piles in the pile group.
Spacing of Piles:
For end-bearing piles founded on a very hard stratum, deriving their load capacity mainly
from end-bearing resistance, the spacing of piles is governed by the competency of the end-
bearing stratum. The minimum spacing of end-bearing piles is 2.5 d, where d is the
diameter of the pile shaft. For piles resting on rock, the minimum spacing of piles is 2 d,
where d is the diameter of the pile shaft.
For friction piles, the pile spacing should ensure that the pressure bulbs of individual piles
do not overlap, which otherwise causes a reduction in the pile capacity. The minimum
spacing of friction piles is 3 d, where d is the diameter of the pile shaft. In the case, of non-
circular piles, such as square or rectangular piles, the diameter of the circle circumscribing
the pile is used to determine the minimum pile spacing.
The spacing of piles should not be so close as to cause direct contact between two adjacent
piles in a group at any level, arising due to the tolerance allowed in alignment for
installation of piles.
Load Capacity of Pile Group in Sand and Gravel:
When piles are driven in loose- to medium-dense cohesionless soils, the soil around the pile
is compacted, increasing the group efficiency. For better results, it is desirable to start the
driving of piles at the center of the site and work outward. For dense sands, the driving of
piles may reduce group efficiency due to dilatancy. In the case of bored piles, there is
limited densification of soil around the pile. Group efficiency, therefore, depends on pile
spacing, and may be less than 100% if piles are spaced closer than 3 d, where d is the
diameter of the pile.The efficiency of the pile group may be obtained from the converse
Lebarre equation for friction piles –
where m is the number of rows of piles, n is the number of piles in each row, B is the
diameter of the pile, and S is the spacing of piles.
The load capacity of a pile group is obtained from –Qug = ƞgNQu
In the case of end-bearing piles, driven in dense sand at a spacing more than 3 d, where d is
the diameter of the pile shaft, group efficiency is generally much more than 100%. The load
capacity of the pile group is taken as –Qug = NQu
For bored piles in sand and gravel, group efficiency is about 2/3 to 3/4.
In the case of piles deriving their support mainly from friction and connected by a pile cap,
the group may be visualized to transmit load to the soil as if from a column of soil enclosed
by the piles. The ultimate capacity of the group may be computed following this concept,
taking into account the frictional capacity along the perimeter of the column of soil as above
and the end-bearing of the said column.
Settlement of a Pile Group:
The settlement of a pile or pile group in clay can be computed from the principles of
consolidation. Settlement of a pile group is more than the settlement of a single pile, even
when the load is the same. This is because the pressure bulb of the pile group is deeper
than that of individual piles, causing the compression of a larger volume of soil by the pile
group.
Video Content / Details of website for further learning (if any):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=20vdT3AEulYhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oA3xzB8
Ldh0
Important Books/Journals for further learning including the page nos.:
1. Dr.B.C.Punmia, Ashok Kumar Jain, Arun Kumar Jain., Laxmi Publications Pvt Ltd,
Sixteenth Edition, 2005. ( Page no – 737 to 740 )
2. BrajaM. Das., Priciples of Foundation Engineering, Seventh Edition, Cengage Learning,
2015. ( Page no –624 to 626 )
Course Teacher
Verified by HOD
MUTHAYAMMAL ENGINEERING COLLEGE
(An Autonomous Institution)
(Approved by AICTE, New Delhi, Accredited by NAAC & Affiliated to Anna University)
Rasipuram - 637 408, Namakkal Dist., Tamil Nadu
L - 35
LECTURE HANDOUTS
CIVIL III / V
Date of Lecture:
Introduction:
It may often be required to use more than one pile below a column, depending on the
column load and the load capacity of a single pile. Usually, driven piles should be provided
in groups and a single pile should not be used.
This is because the pile may move laterally during the driving operation, resulting in the
eccentricity of the load, causing additional bending stresses in the pile, decreasing both the
structural capacity and the soil resistance capacity.
Prerequisite knowledge for Complete understanding and learning of Topic:
Dynamic formulae
Capacity from insitu tests
Types of pile foundation
Negative skin friction
Detailed content of the Lecture:
Load tests on piles are conducted on completion of 28 days after casting of piles. Two types
of tests namely initial and routine tests, for each type of loading viz.
vertical, horizontal (lateral) pull out, are performed on piles.
Load tests on piles are conducted on completion of 28 days after casting of piles. Two types
of tests namely initial and routine tests, for each type of loading viz. vertical, horizontal
(lateral) pull out, are performed on piles.
Load tests on piles are conducted on completion of 28 days after casting of piles. Two types
of tests namely initial and routine tests, for each type of loading viz.
vertical, horizontal (lateral) pull out, are performed on piles.
Initial Load Tests on Piles
This test is performed to confirm the design load calculations and to provide guidelines for
setting up the limits of acceptance for routine tests. It also gives an idea of the suitability of
the piling system. Initial Test on piles are to be carried out at one or more locations
depending on the number of piles required.
Load applied for the initial (cyclic) load test is 2.5 times the safe carrying capacity of the
pile. Loading for Initial Tests is conducted as per Appendix ‘A’ Clause 6.3 of IS-2911 Part
IV.
Routine Load Tests on Piles
Selection of piles for the Routine Test is done based on number of piles required subject to
maximum of ½% of total number of piles required. The number of tests may be increased
to 2% depending on the nature / type of structure. The test load applied is 1½ times the
safe carrying capacity of the pile.
The Maintained load method as described in Clause 6.2 of IS-2911 (Part IV) – 1985 shall be
followed for loading for the Routine Tests.
This test will be performed for the following purposes:
a) To ensure the safe load capacity of piles
b) Detection of any unusual performance contrary to the findings of the Initial Test.
Vertical Load Tests on Piles
This test will be carried out as stipulated in IS-2911 (Part IV) 1995.
Course Teacher
Verified by HOD
MUTHAYAMMAL ENGINEERING COLLEGE
(An Autonomous Institution)
(Approved by AICTE, New Delhi, Accredited by NAAC & Affiliated to Anna University)
Rasipuram - 637 408, Namakkal Dist., Tamil Nadu
L - 36
LECTURE HANDOUTS
CIVIL III / V
Date of Lecture:
Introduction:
A cast-in-situ concrete pile with an enlarged bulb at bottom made by either cutting or
scooping out soil or by any other suitable process is called Under-Reamed Pile. Under-
Reamed Piles are also called bored cast-in-situ concrete piles.
Prerequisite knowledge for Complete understanding and learning of Topic:
Pile load test
Capacity from insitu tests
Types of pile foundation
Negative skin friction
Detailed content of the Lecture:
According to ‘DR.B.C. Punmia, Ashok Kumar Jain, Arun Kumar Jain’ (Author of Soil
Mechanics and Foundations), An Under-Reamed Pile is a cast-in-situ concrete pile, having
one or more bulb in its lower portion. This bulb is called an under ream.
When only one bulb is provided at the bottom of the pile, it is known as single Under-
Reamed Pile foundation. When two or more bulbs are provided at the bottom of the pile, it
is known as multiple bulbs Under-Reamed Pile foundation.
Problem: A 30cm dia 10 m long concrete pile is embedded in a clay deposit having unconfined
comp.st. of 50kN/m2. Estimate the safe uplift capacity of the pile. Assume FOS = 2; Adhesion
factor ά = 0.4; γconc =25kN/m3
Quplift = ά c (пd * L) /F + пd2/4 * L * 25
Quplift = ((0.4 * 25 *п * 0.3 * 10) /2 )+(( п * 0.32 )/ 4 )* 10 *25
Quplift =47.1 + 17.7 = 64.8kN
Video Content / Details of website for further learning (if any):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wyn332e70Cs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jg6YzOejeko
Important Books/Journals for further learning including the page nos.:
1. Dr.B.C.Punmia, Ashok Kumar Jain, Arun Kumar Jain., Laxmi Publications Pvt Ltd,
Sixteenth Edition, 2005. ( Page no – 750 to 757 )
2. BrajaM. Das., Priciples of Foundation Engineering, Seventh Edition, Cengage Learning,
2015. ( Page no –606 to 611 )
Course Teacher
Verified by HOD
MUTHAYAMMAL ENGINEERING COLLEGE
(An Autonomous Institution)
(Approved by AICTE, New Delhi, Accredited by NAAC & Affiliated to Anna University)
Rasipuram - 637 408, Namakkal Dist., Tamil Nadu
L - 37
LECTURE HANDOUTS
CIVIL III / V
Date of Lecture:
Introduction:
A body of soil is said to be in plastic equilibrium if every lift of it is on the verge of
failure.
Rankine investigated the stress conditions corresponding to those states of plastic
equilibrium which can be developed simultaneously throughout a semi infinite mass of
soil acted on by no force other thangravity.
Prerequisite knowledge for Complete understanding and learning of Topic:
Pile foundation
Bearing capacity of soil
Types of foundation
Detailed content of the Lecture:
The stress condition during plastic equilibrium can be represented by the following Mohr
Coulombequation:
Or
Where
Nø= tan' (45° + (ø/2)= flow value
ø1 and ø3 = major and minor principal stresses at any pointin the soil mass,
atfailure.
In terms of stress components in x-z plane,
The theory on which the computation of the stress in a state of plastic equilibrium is based
is called the theory of plasticity. The theory of plasticity pertaining to soils is based on
Mohr’stheory of rupture.
When the material is just on the point of flowing plastically, it is still in static equilibrium,
satisfying the following equilibrium equation in x-z plane:
Combining above equations lead to an equation, called Kotter’sequation, the solution
of which for a given boundary condition gives theorientation of slip lines together
with the stress at each point of the failurezone (Sokolovsky,1965).
The equations of equilibrium in two dimensions are automatically satisfiedby the
Mohr-circle. Also, the state of plastic equilibrium can be represented by two straight
lines at an angle to thea-axis.
Thus the Mohr diagram is a convenient tool for studying the stressconditions at
equilibrium both before and at yield in thesoil.
Course Teacher
Verified by HOD
MUTHAYAMMAL ENGINEERING COLLEGE
(An Autonomous Institution)
(Approved by AICTE, New Delhi, Accredited by NAAC & Affiliated to Anna University)
Rasipuram - 637 408, Namakkal Dist., Tamil Nadu
L -38
LECTURE HANDOUTS
CIVIL III / V
Date of Lecture:
Introduction:
Rankine's Theory assumes that failure will occur when the maximum principal stress at
any point reaches a value equal to the tensile stress in a simple tension specimen at failure.
This theory does not take into account the effect of the other two principal stresses.
Rankine's theory is satisfactory for brittle materials, and not applicable to ductile
materials. This theory is also called the Maximum Stress Theory.
The Rankine theory assumes a frictionless soil-wall interface and a vertical wall (no wall
slope).
Prerequisite knowledge for Complete understanding and learning of Topic:
Soil strength
Bearing capacity of soil
Types of foundation
Detailed content of the Lecture:
Earth pressure
A soil mass retained by a wall exerts a pressure on the wall. This pressure P is called ‘earth
pressure’. The magnitude of this earth pressure depends on the movement of the wall.
Earth pressure at rest-
When there is no movement of wall, the soil is in a state of rest, ie., there is no strain in the
soil. The pressure corresponding to zero lateral strain is called ‘earth pressure at rest’ and
is given by p0 = k0 pv
Where, po – earth pressure at rest at depth ‘z’ below G L
ko - coefficient of earth pressure at rest
pv -effective vertical pressure at depth ‘z’
Example situation : A basement wall ; Lateral movement of the wall is prevented.
Course Teacher
Verified by HOD
MUTHAYAMMAL ENGINEERING COLLEGE
(An Autonomous Institution)
(Approved by AICTE, New Delhi, Accredited by NAAC & Affiliated to Anna University)
Rasipuram - 637 408, Namakkal Dist., Tamil Nadu
L -39
LECTURE HANDOUTS
CIVIL III / V
Date of Lecture:
Introduction:
There are three types of earth pressures on the basis of the movement of the wall.
Earth Pressure at rest
Active Earth Pressure
Problem 2: A smooth vertical wall is 4m height and retains a soil with a bulk unit weight of 18
kN/m3 and ø = 30º. The top of the soil level with the top of the wall and is horizontal. The soil
surface carries a uniformly distributed load of 30 kN/m2. Determine the total active thrust per
meter length of the wall and its point of application.
ka = (1- sin ø) /( 1 + sin ø) = (1- sin 30º )/( 1 + sin 30º )= 0.5 /1.5 = 1/3
At z = 0, pv = q = 30 kN/m2 ; pa = 1 / 3 * 30 = 10 kN/m2
At z = 4 m, pv =30 + 18 * 4 = 102 kN/m2 ; pa = 1/3 * 102 = 34 kN/m2
Total earth thrust = 4 * 10 + ½ * 24 * 4 =88 kN
Resultant –
Taking moment about the base
40 * 2 + 48 * 4/3 = 88 * x
x = (80 + 64) / 88 = 1.64m
Video Content / Details of website for further learning (if any):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vffZvVCmsjU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zwrNbVmvNM&list=TLPQMzAwOTIwMjALfgNo9Q8SC
A&index=2
Important Books/Journals for further learning including the page nos.:
1. Dr.B.C.Punmia, Ashok Kumar Jain, Arun Kumar Jain., Laxmi Publications Pvt Ltd,
Sixteenth Edition, 2005. ( Page no – 503 to 504 )
2. BrajaM. Das., Priciples of Foundation Engineering, Seventh Edition, Cengage Learning,
2015. ( Page no –377 to 380 )
Course Teacher
Verified by HOD
MUTHAYAMMAL ENGINEERING COLLEGE
(An Autonomous Institution)
(Approved by AICTE, New Delhi, Accredited by NAAC & Affiliated to Anna University)
Rasipuram - 637 408, Namakkal Dist., Tamil Nadu
L - 40
LECTURE HANDOUTS
CIVIL III / V
Date of Lecture:
Introduction:
Rankine (1857) consider the equilibrium of a soil element within a soil mass bounded by a
plane surface.
Prerequisite knowledge for Complete understanding and learning of Topic:
Retaining wall
Plastic equilibrium in soils
Active and passive states
Detailed content of the Lecture:
ASSUMPTION :
The soil mass is homogeneous and semi infinite
The soil is dry and cohesionless.
The back of the retaining wall is smooth and vertical .
The ground surface is plane ,which may be horizontal or inclined.
Course Teacher
Verified by HOD
MUTHAYAMMAL ENGINEERING COLLEGE
(An Autonomous Institution)
(Approved by AICTE, New Delhi, Accredited by NAAC & Affiliated to Anna University)
Rasipuram - 637 408, Namakkal Dist., Tamil Nadu
L - 41
LECTURE HANDOUTS
CIVIL III / V
Date of Lecture:
Introduction:
COULOMB'S(1776) developed a method for the determination of the earth pressure in
which he considered the equilibrium of the sliding wedge which is formed when the
movements of the retaining wall takes place.
The Coulomb theory provides a method of analysis that gives the resultant horizontal
force on a retaining system for any slope of wall, wall friction, and slope of backfill
provided.
This theory is based on the assumption that soil shear resistance develops along the wall
and failure plane.
Prerequisite knowledge for Complete understanding and learning of Topic:
Retaining wall
Plastic equilibrium in soils
Active and passive states
Rankine’s theory
Detailed content of the Lecture:
COULOMB'S THEORY
The active case the sliding wedge moves downward and outward relative to the backfill.
In passive case the sliding moves upwards.
The lateral pressure on the wall is equal and opposite to the relative forces extended by
the wall in order to keep the sliding wedge in equilibrium.
COULOMB'S THEORY –SAND – ACTIVE STATE
ASSUMPTIONS :
1. The soil is isotropic and homogeneous
2. The rupture surface is a plane surface
3. The failure wedge is a rigid body
4. The pressure surface is a plane surface
5. There is wall friction on the pressure surface
6. Failure is two-dimensional and
7. The soil is cohesionless
Course Teacher
Verified by HOD
MUTHAYAMMAL ENGINEERING COLLEGE
(An Autonomous Institution)
(Approved by AICTE, New Delhi, Accredited by NAAC & Affiliated to Anna University)
Rasipuram - 637 408, Namakkal Dist., Tamil Nadu
L - 42
LECTURE HANDOUTS
CIVIL III / V
Date of Lecture:
Introduction:
Coulomb’s made the following assumptions in the development of his theory and hence it
is called Coulomb’s Wedge Theory.
Prerequisite knowledge for Complete understanding and learning of Topic:
Retaining wall
Plastic equilibrium in soils
Active and passive states
Rankine’s theory
Detailed content of the Lecture:
COULOMB'S - ACTIVE STATE
In Fig AB is the pressure face, The backfill surface BE is a plane inclined at an angle ß with the
horizontal
α is the angle made by the pressure face AB with the horizontal
H is the height of the wall
AC is the assumed rupture plane surface, and
θ is the angle made by the surface AC with the horizontal
The weight of the wedge W length of the wall may be written as
W = γA, where A = area of wedge ABC
Area of wedge ABC = A = 1/2 AC x BD, where BD is drawn perpendicular to AC.
From the law of sines, we have
Making the substitution and simplifying we have,
The various forces that are acting on the wedge are shown in Fig.a
As the pressure face AB moves away from the backfill, there will be sliding of the soil
mass along the wall from B towards A.
The sliding of the soil mass is resisted by the friction of the surface.
The direction of the shear stress is in the direction from A towards B.
lf Pn is the total normal reaction of the soil pressure acting on face AB,
The resultant of Pn and the shearing stress is the active pressure Pa making an angle δ
with the normal.
Since the shearing stress acts upwards, the resulting Pa dips below the normal.
The angle δ for this condition is considered positive.
As the wedge ABC ruptures along plane AC, it slides along this plane.
This is resisted by the frictional force acting between the soil at rest below AC, and the
sliding wedge. The resisting shearing stress is acting in the direction from A towards
C.
If Wn is the normal component of the weight of wedge W on plane AC, the resultant of
the normal Wn and the shearing stress is the reaction R.
This makes an angle ϕ with the normal since the rupture takes place within the soil
itself.
Statical equilibrium requires that the three forces Pa, W, and R meet at a point.
Since AC is not the actual rupture plane, the three forces do not meet at a point.
But if the actual surface of failure AC'C is considered, all three forces meet at a point.
However, the error due to the non concurrence of the forces is very insignificant and as
such may be neglected.The polygon of forces is shown in Fig.
In Eq. , the only variable is θ and all the other terms for a given case are constants.
Substituting for W, we have
The maximum value for Pa is obtained by differentiating Eq. with respect to θ and
equating the derivative to zero, i.e.
The maximum value of Pa so obtained may be written as
where KA is the active earth pressure coefficient.
The total normal component Pn of the earth pressure on the back of the wall is
If the wall is vertical and smooth, and if the backfill is horizontal, we have
ß=δ= 0 and α= 90 deg, Substituting these values in Eq.
The total normal component of the passive earth pressure Pn on the back of the wall is
For a smooth vertical wall with a horizontal backfill, we have
Course Teacher
Verified by HOD
MUTHAYAMMAL ENGINEERING COLLEGE
(An Autonomous Institution)
(Approved by AICTE, New Delhi, Accredited by NAAC & Affiliated to Anna University)
Rasipuram - 637 408, Namakkal Dist., Tamil Nadu
L - 43
LECTURE HANDOUTS
CIVIL III / V
Date of Lecture:
Introduction:
A soil mass retained by a wall exerts a pressure on the wall. This pressure P is called ‘earth
pressure’. The magnitude of this earth pressure depends on the movement of the wall.
Prerequisite knowledge for Complete understanding and learning of Topic:
Retaining wall
Plastic equilibrium in soils
Active and passive states
Rankine’s theory
Detailed content of the Lecture:
Earth pressure at rest-
When there is no movement of wall, the soil is in a state of rest, ie., there is no strain in the
soil. The pressure corresponding to zero lateral strain is called ‘earth pressure at rest’ and
is given by,
p0 = k0 pv
Where, po – earth pressure at rest at depth ‘z’ below G L
ko - coefficient of earth pressure at rest
pv -effective vertical pressure at depth ‘z’
Example situation : A basement wall ; Lateral movement of the wall is prevented.
Active earth pressure
When a wall moves away from the back fill, the earth pressure reduces. Beyond certain
movement, the earth pressure reaches a minimum value. This minimum pressure is
known as ‘active earth pressure’, and is given by
pa = ka pv
Where, pa – active earth pressure
ka – coefficient of active earth pressure
Ex : Retaining wall on a hill slope; Bridge abutments
Passive earth pressure
When a wall moves towards the back fill, the earth pressure increases. Beyond certain
movement, it reaches a maximum and is known as ‘passive earth pressure’.
Ex: Anchored sheet pile walls ; Anchors are subjected to passive pressure.
Passive earth pressure is given by,
pp = kp * pv
Where, pp – passive earth pressure
kp – coefficient of passive earth pressure
The coefficients, k0, ka , * kp are obtained as:
k0 = 1- sin ø or
ka = (1-sin ø) / (1+ sin ø) ; kp =( 1+ sin ø)/( 1- sin ø)
Where ø – angle of shearing resistance
Video Content / Details of website for further learning (if any):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aKseZc-d-
zQhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p4eTr5ZFRZQ
Important Books/Journals for further learning including the page nos.:
1. Dr.B.C.Punmia, Ashok Kumar Jain, Arun Kumar Jain., Laxmi Publications Pvt Ltd,
Sixteenth Edition, 2005. ( Page no – 522 to 523 )
2. BrajaM. Das., Priciples of Foundation Engineering, Seventh Edition, Cengage Learning,
2015. ( Page no –377 to 402 )
Course Teacher
Verified by HOD
MUTHAYAMMAL ENGINEERING COLLEGE
(An Autonomous Institution)
(Approved by AICTE, New Delhi, Accredited by NAAC & Affiliated to Anna University)
Rasipuram - 637 408, Namakkal Dist., Tamil Nadu
L - 44
LECTURE HANDOUTS
CIVIL III / V
Date of Lecture:
Introduction:
CULMANN'S (1866)developed a method which is more general than rehbanns method
It can be used to determine coulombs earth pressure for ground surface for any
configuration for various types of surcharge loads and the layered backfills.
The method of construction of the force triangle in a rotated orientation.
Prerequisite knowledge for Complete understanding and learning of Topic:
Retaining wall
Coulomb’s wedge theory
Active and passive states
Rankine’s theory
Detailed content of the Lecture:
CULMANN'S METHOD- GRAPHICAL REPRESENTATION
ACTIVE PRESSURE BY CULMANN'S METHOD FOR COHESIONLESS SOILS
Culmann's (1866) method is the same as the trial wedge method. In Culmann's method, the force
polygons are constructed directly on the ϕ-line AE taking AE as the load line.
The procedure is as follows:
1. Draw ϕ -line AE at an angle ϕ to the horizontal.
2. Lay off on AE distances, AV, A1, A2, A3, etc.to a suitable scale to represent the weight of
wedges ABV, A51, AS2, AS3, etc. respectively.
3. Draw lines parallel to AD from points V, 1, 2, 3 to intersect assumed rupture lines AV,
Al,A2, A3 at points V", I',2', 3', etc. respectively.
4. Join points V, 1', 2' 3' etc. by a smooth curve which is the pressure locus.
5. Select point C‘ on the pressure locus such that the tangent to the curve at this point is
parallel to the ϕ-line AE.
6. Draw C'C parallel to the pressure line AD. The magnitude of C'C in its natural units gives
the active pressure Pa.
7. Join AC" and produce to meet the surface of the backfill at C. AC is the rupture line. For the
plane backfill surface, the point of application of Pa is at a height of H/3 from the base of
the wall.
Video Content / Details of website for further learning (if any):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=whf_bhRvZk8https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vhEZ8K
ac5fA
Important Books/Journals for further learning including the page nos.:
1. Dr.B.C.Punmia, Ashok Kumar Jain, Arun Kumar Jain., Laxmi Publications Pvt Ltd,
Sixteenth Edition, 2005. ( Page no – 532 to 535 )
2. BrajaM. Das., Priciples of Foundation Engineering, Seventh Edition, Cengage Learning,
2015. ( Page no –405 to 428 )
Course Teacher
Verified by HOD
MUTHAYAMMAL ENGINEERING COLLEGE
(An Autonomous Institution)
(Approved by AICTE, New Delhi, Accredited by NAAC & Affiliated to Anna University)
Rasipuram - 637 408, Namakkal Dist., Tamil Nadu
L - 45
LECTURE HANDOUTS
CIVIL III / V
Date of Lecture:
Introduction:
STABILITY OF RETAINING WALLS
1. Check for sliding
2. Check for overturning
3. Check for bearing capacity failure
4. Check for base shear failure
The minimum factors of safety for the stability of the wall are:
1. Factor of safety against sliding =1.5
2. Factor of safety against overturning = 2.0
3. Factor of safety against bearing capacity failure = 3.0
Prerequisite knowledge for Complete understanding and learning of Topic:
Retaining wall
Coulomb’s wedge theory
Active and passive states
Rankine’s theory
Detailed content of the Lecture:
Conditions of Stability of Retaining Walls
To ensure the stability of a retaining wall, the following conditions or requirements must be met:
The wall should be structurally capable of resisting the pressure applied to it.
The wall should be so properly proportioned that it will not get overturned by the lateral
pressure.
The wall should be safe from consideration of sliding, i.e., the wall should not be pushed
out by the lateral pressure.
The weight of wall together with the force resulting from the earth pressure acting on it,
should not stress its foundation to a value greater than safe bearing capacity of the soil.
It is important to prevent accumulation of water behind a retaining wall. The backing
material should be suitably drained by providing weep holes.
Long masonry retaining walls should be provided with expansion joints located at 6 to 9m
apart.
Weep holes may be provided to relieve water pressure
Course Teacher
Verified by HOD