app is not really the kernel, just the name. In this case I'd expect to see AppKernel, would that be nicer to show?

If it's namespaced it can get messy.. but you're right; it's different information. Both are useful :')

What about;
Symfony 3.2.0-DEV on \My\AppKernel(name: app, env: dev, debug: true)

Or with verbosity;

$ bin/console -V
Symfony 3.2.0-DEV

vs.

$ bin/console -V --verbose
Symfony 3.2.0-DEV on \My\AppKernel(name: app, env: dev, debug: true)

But im not sure thats common or even semantically correct..

I personally prefer the verbosity flag but I don't know how intuitive this is.

Another solution would be to remove the name: app thing and to not add the kernel info either.

There might be a lot more info about the kernel you'd want to see... What about simply adding the version + release date (if available) and making an application info command? Not sure if this would be interesting for the core, but it might show nice things such as which bundles are enabled.

@iltar i was just thinking about that.. with --verbose we can go really crazy;

I'm afraid that eventually it will come down to this: We need a command line WDT variant

Agree, this is still not great as a header line when used with bin/console. So what do we need to show for -V then? (assuming everything is available with bin/console info in some time).

Perhaps kernel info is a bit too specific indeed =/

For now I'd say a limit of what's available in the Kernel constants. I would love to have more debugging info on the command line though, such as a CLI WDT. Maybe a nice feature for 3.2 (though I have no time to work on this).

removed kernel:info command

Please, let's focus first on finishing this pull request about the console header. Then we can discuss about the kernel:info command in a separate issue. Thanks!

Done.

I would not remove the app name here. You can have several one and being able to have it with -V is important.

Any news on this one?

@ro0NL Still interested in finishing this one?

Yes. Try to work on it today. As soon as my laptop is connected :(

Op 19 jul. 2016 17:35 schreef "Fabien Potencier" [email protected]:

@ro0NL https://github.com/ro0NL Still interested in finishing this one?

—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#19275 (comment),
or mute the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AA_8kAIy7NN_USpVFhfpth5vuvP7fo8Pks5qXO68gaJpZM4JD0O5
.

Back up :) @fabpot it's going to be Symfony 3.2.0-DEV (kernel: app, env: dev, debug: true) then.. where kernel refers the kernel name, not the kernel type.

I think it makes sense.. if #19278 is accepted we have more detailed information anyway.

Maybe the minor UI change for console applications is worth noting..., not sure.

Tests should be updated as they do not pass with these changes.

Green :)

Thank you @ro0NL.