rot solve the dynamic problem of finding the path or orbit ofa particle
Acted on by fore. Only if we know the nature ofthe fore (is eo
‘merical and physical features) can We solve the problem by replacing Fin
‘Newton's equation by an algebraic expression and then solving the equa
‘ion Tor the Body's acceleration to obtain an obit
[Newon’s third law is as simple as the other two laws, but it ato-
duces ito the ction of forces remarkable symmetry that does nt appear
im the fist wo laws. It states, essentially, that forces appear ia equal and
‘pponite pis in nature, which we can best understand by staying the
interaction of wo bodies that pull upon each othe gravitationally, Such 8
‘the sun andthe earth, The thi nw states that the magnitude ofthe pl of
the sun onthe ea exactly equals the magitie of the earth's pllon the
‘sun, andthe two pulls ae long the same line but opposite to each oer.
Newton stated ths law inthe mest peneal way as follows: I body A.
‘exerts force of any kind on body 2, then exerts an exactly eal and
‘opposite free on (hela of action and reaction: every ation in nature
isaccompanied by an equal and opposite reaction, We discus this fw in
rater detail in Chapter 6,
curren 6
Newton's Law of Gravity and His
Contemporaries
vey gree sic rath goes rough tree
segs Poh, pope sy cific the Be
ety sy ith eon dconred ore
Last heyy they ay tied
The laws of mire that scientists study may be divided into dsine
categories, which ae intertelatd but are often developed independenty
‘The basic categery consists of those laws, theoves, ar speculation th
dea with space ad time. In Newtonian mechanies and Newronian theory.
Space and time se assumed te independent of each other and space
seomety is assumed tobe Euclidean o fat, Morover space is accepted
1 absolute (distunces between evens are the same forall abserver) and
infinite in extent Time is also assumed to be absolute and wing contin:
‘ously fom an infinite past to an infinite fate, In our discussion ofthe
quantum theory andthe theory of relativity, we shall show how these
Exclidean and absolute concepts had to be changed
‘The second category consists ofthe laws of motion, which establish
te relationship tetween the motion of a body and the force acting onthe
body, as illutaied by Newton's thre laws of motion. These lws-—
without which ne cannot deduce che nature of the baie structures (or
‘example, atoms, molecules planes, stars) in the univese—are general
Semen in which the nature of the fores that proce changes inthe
States of motion isnot specified. Since the description of the sate of
‘otion ofa body involves both space and time, the laws of motion depend
‘on the geomeuy we impose on space and out assumption about the rel
Yionhip between space and time,
“The laws th escibe the forces in nature constitute the thi eatego-1, among which is Newton's law of gravity. Today, we recognize or
sssume the existence of four basic fees: gravity, the electromagnetic
once, the weak interaction (a special ind of weak force in the ncleus of
fan tom that maintains a proper balance between the numberof neutrons
find protons ina nicews), and the song nuclear force. Here, we limit
furslves toa discussion of gravity, which may be defined asthe prime
fore in the univers, I goverms such large structures as planets, stars he
solar system, galaxies, and the universe iself. If gravity disappeared,
none ofthese Structures could exis.
‘Ala of fore generally contains two features tat are independent of
eachother. The firs is eomrical n that it describes the dependence of
the force (its magni and direction) on the geometrical relationship
between two intrcting bodies; the second featre is ninsic to the
interacting bodies in thi it gives the dependence ofthe magnitude of the
{ce on some physical propery of each ofthe interacting bodies. A force
‘betwen two interacting bodies may aso depend on thei states of motion,
‘but Newtonian gravity doesnot.
‘Newton was probably directed to his formulation ofthe law of grav-
ity by Kepler's tia law of planetary moton and his own Second law of
tmotion. One can imagine Newton contemplating 2 falling apple while
thinking of his own second law of motion, which el him that aceeer
tion implies free, The aple i accelerated toward the ground; henee the
‘round exer force on the apple, and so the aw of gravity is conceived
‘Whether or not tatlly happened this ay is of ite importance. but,
[Newton's bold conjecture tha the earth and, infact all bois generate
‘ravity was the beginning of avast developmest of profound ideas that
‘ulminated in Einstein's great achievements
‘Newon’s conjecture was just the beginning of the formulation of bis
law of gravity—he sil had o show its geometrical and itinsic aspects
iscused above, From Kepler’ hid law of planetary motion, one can
‘deduce quite easily the dependence ofthe magnitude of the gravitational
force between the sun and planet on thei separation. Kepler didnot do
this because he dd aot think ofthe sun's action on a plantas being along
the line tothe sin, whereas Newion did. But Newton went beyond think
ing ofthe force of gravity as being arscited only with he earth, the sun,
land the planets. He generalized the gravity concept and assumed it 0 be
‘universal inthe sense that all particles inthe universe pll on each exer
{ravttionally. To show this, be wrote the algebraic expression forthe
Ervitatonl teraction of two particles of arbitrary mass separated by an
aubitray distance
‘To simplify his task, he considered the force between two mass
points (pricls with no size or shape), thereby eliminating the problems
{hat the shape and size of the intereting bodies might reset. Newton
confronted the following problem: Given two paticles with masses my
and m, (m stancing for mass andthe subscripts and 2 identifying the
particles) separned by a distance r. how large and in what direction ie
‘hei gravitational interacon? By “interaction” here, we mean the pul of
my on m, oF of ma 0 my, Which, acoeding to Newton's third lw, are
sual and opposte
"rom very zeneral symmetry considerations, Newton reasoned that
the force mast be along the ine connecting the two masses: oterwise, the
two particles would begin 10 revolve around each ther, and a body
allowed ofall firey onthe earth would acquire horizontal as well 35
‘etcal motion, contrary to what actually oocurs in the real worl,
‘With the direction ofthe force setled, Newton tured to the magn
tude of the fore, which, as we have aeady noted, has 4 geometrical
component (the cstance between the particles) and anintinsic component
(the masses of te particles). To obtain the distance pat of the fw of
tavity, Newon reasoned that since the force of eavity spreads ut from
8 particle uniforaly and equally in all directions, the intensity ofthe force
decreases with te square ofthe distance berween the particles. If this
distance is doubled, the force is reduced 4-fld if the distance i ripe,
the fore is rediced fol; and so on. We may sty the force varies
inversely asthe quae of the distance (tbe inverse-square law). Note that
‘owing to this disance dependence, the ore of gravity gets weaker a the
distance increases, but it never drops to zero. Therefore, the notion thi
‘me by can escape from the gravitational pull f another (for example,
ftom te earth's gravity is false
To incorponte into his laws the mass dependence of the force, Ne:
ton first assumed that gravity is generated by mass and then thatthe
strength ofthe ferce between two particles must depend symmetrically on
their masses, sine otherwise the action and reaction of the particles would
ot be equal and opposite. The ony algebraic combination that gives the
‘correct symmetry) i the prot mms of the two masses
Combining hs expression withthe distance dependence ofthe force,
"New wrote his la of gravity as follows, where Fisthe force of gravity
rom
We have abeady iscused the mass and distance pars ofthis fo.‘mula bt whit abou the factor G? From where does it come? This factor,
known as Newton's “universal constant of gravity.” is absolutely essen
without tthe formula would be wrong on two count: It Would give
‘ch too lage vale forthe strength ofthe gravitational force, and it
‘would be incomplete dimensionally inthe sense that is space, time, and
‘mass ingredients would be wrong. Noe that force is mass times aceclera-
don according to Newton's second law of motion and acceleration is
Tength overtime squared, so that force is mass times length overtime
squared. But without G, the formula fr force would be mass imes mas
‘over length squared, which is not force. To change this lst combination
‘of mass and length tothe corect one for force, Newion multiplied it by
the constant G, which ha just the right combination of space-time and
mass ingredients to ive the compete Newtonian formula the corect
Space-time-miss ingredients, and thereby obtained the corect dimen
Sons in terms of oar basic physical entities, The space-time mass com
positon of G is length cubed divided by the product of mass and time
Square. To put if differently, Gis expressed as erg ec, and iis
‘merical value (First measured by Henry Cavendish abouts centary and a
fal after Newon discovered the inverse-square lw of gravity is 6.668 %
10-* emg sec
With Newon’s lw of gravity and his second law of motion, astrono-
‘my advanced fom a hitorsmiss science to precise mathematical disci
pine. This was particularly true of the study’ of planetary orbits, which
{developed into what ws called “celesal mechanics," one ofthe most
beautfl and reatest achievements of the human mind, The power of
"Newtons lw of gravity, along with hi laws of motion o solve problems
that stem fom the gravitational interaction of bodies is evident at once
when these laws are applied to determining the orbits of planet around
the sin. The combined elfors of Brahe and Kepet, which led to the
‘empirical discovery ofthe nature ofthe planetary orbits (Keper’s three
laws of planetary motion), represented some 60 man-years of labor, But
vith Neon’ awe, one ca each te same goal in a mater of an hou or
‘more. This diferenceiustrates the great predictive power of a corect
theory combined with comet logie (mathematics).
"Newton futher demonstated the power of his laws by correctly
explaining the phenomenon of the tides asa consequence ofthe pravita-
tional pull ofthe moon and sun on the earth's oceans, lakes, and iver.
He showed thatthe gravitational frce varies inversely a the cube ofthe
distance Because the tidal pul i given by the diference between the pull
(pertnit mass on the earths bodies of water and the pll per unit mass on
the ea as a whcle. Because the moon i about 400 mes closer than the
sun is tidal pull about twice that ofthe sun even though the suns total
frviational all onthe earth asa whole is about 180 times that ofthe
“Although Newton is most famous fr his laws of motion and bis awe
of gravity, he made other important scientific discoveries. His work In
‘optics is paricully noteworthy because ofits practical and theoretical
Importance. Although Kepler had developed hi dioptric showing how
rages are formed with lenses and Galileo had built his telescope, very
lie was known sbout the nature of light or ow its propagated. Newion
took the first big step in explaining the ature of light by showing that a
team of white light is spread out ino a band of colors (2 spectrin)
ranging fom redo volt after pasing through a wiangular prism, thus
proving that whit lights “white” because tsa mintre of ligt fall
the diferent colos. He supported this conclusion by showing tha if one
ofthe colored beams leaving the prism is sent through an identical second
Prism, the colored beam does nt fan out into the spectam, asthe white
beam did, but remains the same as it was before entering the second.
prism. This mears that te colors ae in the white eam and notin the
Prism. Newton showed tht ithe fan af colores from the fst prism passes
through an identical inverted prism, the beam of white ight reappears,
showing thatthe second psn reverses the action ofthe fist pis by.
recombining alle colors. Newton thus demonstrated a very important
property of light propagaton—its reversibility. This means that ifthe
‘izeton ofa beas of Hight passing through a given medium ora series of
filferent media (br example, air, water las) i reversed a any point,
‘he team simply retraces its path This phenomenon of reversibility
‘very important in nature because, in general t does not occur. That it
oes inthis instance has raised some very important questions about the
laws of nature in general, because they seem to india that reversibility
should be as common in mature as imeveriiliy. Newton experimented.
with lenses and mirrors and showed that a concave spherical mirror
(ich he ground and polished himself fom new glass) forms an image
4st asa Jens dors, but one that is fice of the undesable chromatic
sberation (a surounding colored rm that attends the image formed by a
Jens. He conectyatibuted the chromatic aberration of lens to slight
rismati shape, a one passes from its center to its edge, and noted tht
‘ving to the absence of chromatic aeration a telescope with a concave
‘mor (a elect gives sharper images than one with lens (a efector.
This has made avast difference in the use of large astronomical tlescopes, without which many ofthe remarkable cosmic discoveries fllow-
‘ing Newton could not have been made
From the ine of Archimedes, the students of natural phenomena had
wondered and speculated about the nature of light and ow iis propa-
ated. Galileo hd red, very crudely and unsuccessfully to measure the
Speed of fight, nd Kepler had speculated about is nature, but Newion
‘asthe first to propose a precise theory about its propagation. He was led
{ois theory by noting tht when a beam of ight strikes an opague screen
with very sharp edge, the ede ofthe shadow ofthe seen cast ona
tite wall lose to the screen appears fo Beas sharp as that ofthe screen
itself, Ieappeared to Newton that none of the beam bent around the edge
‘ofthe screen and nto the shadow, a i would flight were propagated asa
trave. Newton believed this result meant that ight aves in a Staight ine
pst a sharp edge (contrary to the behavior of, for example, a wave of
ound or water) instead of Being difacted as a wave would be. He
therefore concluded that light consis of pails that, acoeding to his
fist lw of motion, must travel in staight lines, since the edge of the
scoen exers no fee on the ight. This conclusion med the bi ofthe
[Newtonian corpuscular theory of ight, hich was ater discarded in favor
ofthe wave theory when more accurate observations showed that the edge
‘ofthe sren’s shadow is not sharp but fuzzy, so thatthe beam is df=
fracted around a sharp edge. Moreover the Newtonian corpuscular theory
‘of igh requires thatthe speed of light in dense mediom such as glss oF
Water be greater thin is speed in a rae medium such as air oF in a
‘actum, which i contrary tothe experimental evidence.
'Newlon, in his Optits, propounded a series of remarkable ques
tions, which showed how deeply he was concerned abut light. Inthe last
ofthese questions he suggested that under cerain circumstances, light
fd matter might be changed into each other. This doesnot mean that
[Newton had the slightest notion about relativity theory, but the theory
shows that Newon's conjecture was corect.
"Although Newton was the dominant physical siems from the late
17th othe eariy Ith century, otber brillant scieatsts made substantial