" PERSONALITY TRAITS AS PREDICTORS OF ROMANTIC
RELATIONSHIP AMONG COLLEGE STUDENTS "
1. How may the personality of the respondents be described?
Table 1
Distribution of the Respondents in terms of Personality
Personality Frequency Percentage
Extraversion 3 3
Agreeableness 19 19
Conscientiousness 11 11
Neuroticism 5 5
Openness 62 62
TOTAL 100 100
2. How may the level of satisfaction of the respondents towards their romantic
relationship be described?
Table 2
Assessment on the Level of Satisfaction of the Respondents
Towards their Romantic Relationship
Weighted Standard
STATEMENT Interpretation
Mean Deviation
1. How well does your partner meet your needs? 3.91 1.065 High
2. In general, how satisfied are you with your
relationship?
4.15 1.158 High
3. How good is your relationship compared to most? 4.06 1.090 High
4. How often do you wish you hadn't gotten to this
relationship?
3.85 1.274 High
5. To what extent has your relationship met your
original expectations?
3.77 1.053 High
6. How much do you love your partner? 4.35 1.048 Very High
7. How many problems are there in your relationship? 3.10 1.283 High
Composite Mean 3.884 0.783 High
1.00-1.79 = Very Low, 1.80-2.59=Low, 2,60-3.39=Moderate, 3.40-4.19=High, 4.20-5.00=Very High
3. Can personality trait predict romantic relationships among the respondents?
Table 3
Summary of Computations if Personality Trait Can Predict the Level of Satisfaction
of the Respondents Towards their Romantic Relationship
Computed
p-value Decision Conclusion
Value
Personality Taits vs Level of
Satisfaction towards Romantic 21.714 0.041 Reject H0 Significant
Relationship
The table above shows that the personality trait (independent variables) statistically
significantly predict the level of romantic relationship (dependent variable), F(5, 94) =
21.714, p < 0.05.
4. What personality trait greatly affects/predicts the level of romantic relationship??
Table 4
Personality Trait That Can Predict the Level of Satisfaction of the Respondents
Towards their Romantic Relationship
Standardized
Unstandardized Coefficients Coefficients
Model B Std. Error Beta t p-value
1 (Constant) 1.352 0.795 1.701 0.092
EXTRAVERSION 0.036 0.016 0.207 2.233 0.028
AGREEABLENESS 0.025 0.016 0.168 1.613 0.110
COSCIENTIOUSNE -0.023 0.017 -0.130 -1.355 0.179
SS
NEUROTICISM 0.001 0.015 0.004 0.047 0.963
OPENNESS 0.044 0.015 0.328 2.920 0.004
a. Dependent Variable: Level of Romantic Relationship
The table above shows that among the personality traits considered, extraversion with
probability values of 0.028 and openness with corresponding probability value of 0.004;
both are lesser as compared to alpha value of 0.005 are the personality traits that most
likely predicts the level of romantic relationship among the respondents.
(For Appendix)
COMPUTATIONS
Summary of Responses on Satisfaction on Romantic Relationship
Question Total Weighted Standard Verbal
x1 x2 x3 x4 x5
No. Responses Mean Deviation Interpretation
1 5 2 25 33 35 100 3.91 1.065 High
2 5 6 12 23 54 100 4.15 1.158 High
3 5 4 14 34 43 100 4.06 1.090 High
4 9 3 26 18 44 100 3.85 1.274 High
5 4 6 27 35 28 100 3.77 1.053 High
6 4 2 13 17 64 100 4.35 1.048 Very High
7 15 15 32 21 17 100 3.10 1.283 High
Composite Mean 3.884 0.783 High
Regression
Notes
Output Created 31-JAN-2024 05:47:19
Comments
Input Active Dataset DataSet0
Filter <none>
Weight <none>
Split File <none>
N of Rows in Working Data File 100
Missing Value Handling Definition of Missing User-defined missing values are
treated as missing.
Cases Used Statistics are based on cases with
no missing values for any variable
used.
Syntax REGRESSION
/MISSING LISTWISE
/STATISTICS COEFF OUTS R
ANOVA
/CRITERIA=PIN(.05) POUT(.10)
/NOORIGIN
/DEPENDENT ROM_REL
/METHOD=ENTER EXTRA
AGREE COSCIEN NEURO
OPEN.
Resources Processor Time 00:00:00.00
Elapsed Time 00:00:00.02
Memory Required 4816 bytes
Additional Memory Required for 0 bytes
Residual Plots
Variables Entered/Removeda
Variables
Model Variables Entered Removed Method
1 OPEN, NEURO, . Enter
EXTRA,
COSCIEN,
AGREEb
a. Dependent Variable: ROM_REL
b. All requested variables entered.
Model Summary
Std. Error of the
Model R R Square Adjusted R Square Estimate
1 .503a .253 .213 .72715
a. Predictors: (Constant), OPEN, NEURO, EXTRA, COSCIEN, AGREE
ANOVAa
Model Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
1 Regression 16.807 5 3.361 6.357 .000b
Residual 49.703 94 .529
Total 66.510 99
a. Dependent Variable: ROM_REL
b. Predictors: (Constant), OPEN, NEURO, EXTRA, COSCIEN, AGREE
Coefficientsa
Standardized
Unstandardized Coefficients Coefficients
Model B Std. Error Beta t Sig.
1 (Constant) 1.352 .795 1.701 .092
EXTRA .036 .016 .207 2.233 .028
AGREE .025 .016 .168 1.613 .110
COSCIEN -.023 .017 -.130 -1.355 .179
NEURO .001 .015 .004 .047 .963
OPEN .044 .015 .328 2.920 .004
a. Dependent Variable: ROM_REL
