Solved Problems Transfer Function
Solved Problems Transfer Function
June 2009
3. h.
Problem 1
dV (1)
V + VT= but− 2)
dt
The temperature T is imposed by the previous process, but the signal u can be
manipulated. It is also known that the system normally operates with a value of u in
turns to 30% of its range, a value for which, under steady conditions and with a
inlet temperature of 60ºC, the viscosity is 50, all in the system of
units in which it is expressed (1). (t time in minutes)
T V
M
Figure 1.
It is requested:
It is requested: Draw a control and instrumentation diagram with ISA nomenclature that
meet the aforementioned requirements and explain its functioning.
Condenser
Vapor
Condensed
C
Subject Exam:
June 2009
1 h.
Issues
1. What is the Nyquist diagram of a system and what can it be used for?
3. What can you say about the type of response to a step jump in the
input that would present a system whose transfer function would be:
(s− 2)e−5s
2
+ 4s+1
Step Response
0.5
-0.5
-1
-1.5
-2
-2.5
0 5 10 15
Time (sec)
Solution to problem 1
It is known that:
dV
V + VT − but− 0.5)= 0
dt
dΔV dΔV
V0 + (T0+ )ΔV+ V0 ΔT= 100Δu(t− 0.5
dt dt 0
dΔV
50 + 60ΔV= 100Δu(t− 0.5)− 50ΔT
dt
10e− 0.5s 5
V(s)= U(s)− T(s)
5 seconds+ 6 5s+ 6
T
D(s)
U V(s)
G(s)
Design by Lopez with MISE criteria => because I want to eliminate changes in the
disturbance T(s), as I do not want steady-state errors, a PI or a POD, and as I want
minimize large errors at the workplace: MISE criterion
d = 0.5
τ = 5/6 = 0.83
K = 10/6 = 1.6
MISE
b b
= a ⎛⎜ ⎞⎟ = a ⎛⎜ ⎞⎟
b τ d Td d
K p K= a ⎛⎜ ⎞⎟
d
Ti ⎝τ ⎠ τ ⎝τ ⎠
⎝τ ⎠
In order to apply thisτ in our case: 0.5/0.83 = 0.6 <1 => it holds
c) A feedforward is not convenient => because the output of the system affected by the
perturbations is much faster than the system transfer function G(S)
which has a delay of 0.5 m.
d) Closed-loop system:
T
D(s)
W U V(s)
PI G(s)
Steady error:
1 D(s)
e ss = lim sE(s) = lim W(s) - T (s))
s → 0 → s 0 1 + G(s)R(s) 1 + G(s)R(s)
− 5 / ( 5 s + 6) 0.9663 seconds
E(s)= − −0.5s
T(S)= T(s)
1 + 1.6e (0.83s+ 1)*1.33(1+ 1/1.16s 0.9663s + 1.16s+ 2.12e−05s + 2.4592e−0.5s
2
s
Amplitude = 2 * | F(jw) |
G(s)R(s) D(s)
Y(s)= W(s)+ V(s)
1+ G(s)R(s) 1+ G(s)R(s)
1.6e−0.5s1.33(1.16s+ 1)
(0.83s+ 1.16s
F(s)= W(s)
1.6e−0.5s1.33(1.16s+ 1)
1+
(0.83s+ 1) 1.16s
Solution Problem 2
FT FC FF
LC
FC FT
A TT
Capacitor
TTConditions
Terms and
PC
TC LS TT
PT
FY FY
TT
Vapor FT
Condensed DC
LT LC
C DT
Problems of the Subject 'Control and Instrumentation of Chemical Processes'
4th year of Chemical Engineering
Problem 1
In the system of the figure, two storage tanks, A and B, can be seen,
Aliquid arrives from certain supply sources.The output from deposit B passes through
a reheater powered by heating steam and pours into the tank C where also
pour the output from tankA. The liquids must be mixed in a certain proportion. The mixture
both in the agitated tank C is sent to another process that imposes the consumption of
certain variable amounts over time. This mixture must also be sent to
constant temperature maintained with precision despite possible disturbances. It is assumed
that the liquid that reaches B and A does so at a sensibly constant temperature, due to the
On the contrary, the supply pressure of the heating steam undergoes significant changes.
vapor
A B
It is requested:
1) design a regulatory system that meets the proposed objectives, placing the
transmitters, actuators and necessary controllers.
2)justifythedesignmadebyexplainingitsobjectivesandhowitworks.
Solution:
FY vape
PC
LC
LC
A B LT
FT FT
FF FC TT TC
TC
C TT
LC LT
Since the outlet flow of C is predetermined, the level controls LC in the three
deposits should be implemented backwards, manipulating the input to the deposits. They could
Design flow-level cascades, but the level is not critical and does not seem necessary, therefore.
In an open-loop test, the temporal response of the temperature in ºC has been measured.
when the control signal to the valve varied by -20%, resulting in that of the figure with the
timescaleinminutes.
It is requested:
1) Design a regulator that does not exhibit steady-state error in response to step changes in the
reference, that it does not present overshoot before them and that it stabilizes in a time not
longerthan3minutes.Justifythedesignmade.
2) If the regulator reference changes at a ramp of 5 °C/min, will it present the
Isthereasteady-stateerrorinthesystem?Ifso,calculateit.
3) Draw the root locus corresponding to variations in the gain of the regulator and
comment on it.
Solution:
1) The system, given the shape of its step response, can be approximated by a system of
first order without delay, since it is a stable response without inflection in the response nor
overpeak.
K
G(s)
ts+1
According to the design criteria, and considering the type of process model,
we can choose the tuning method called d-tuning in which the design criterion
is to obtain a system that in closed loop has a response similar to that of the function of
transfer
1
ls+1
The regulator, since a first-order system like this process does not have
integrators should be of the PI or PID type. The tuning table of Rivera-Morari for a PI
Improved provides the values of the regulator parameters according to:
2t + d d
Kp= T=
i t +
2Kl 2
Where K is the gain, tau is the time constant, and d is the delay of a first-order model.
order with delay that can represent the open loop process. In our case d=0, of
so that the validity condition for using the table is fulfilled:
l
1.7
d
The first-order model can be obtained graphically as can be seen in the figure.
Gain is the change in output divided by the change in input:
2.5 °C
K= -0.125
-20 %
and the time constant can be calculated, either using the maximum slope method,
Well searching at the moment in time when the final change of 63.2% is reached. Both
methods give very similar values = 1.2 min., so that:
K -0.125
G(s)= =
ts+1 1.2s +1
andtheregulatorparametersareasfollows:
1.58
2.5
1.2
1
E(s) = W(s)
1+G(s) R(s)
1 Ti s+1 1.2s + 1
R(s)=K p(1+)=Kp( )= -12.8
Ti s Ti s 1.2s
so that:
1
E(s)= W(s)
1 + G(s)R(s)
1 5
=
(-0.125) (-12.8)(1.2s+1) s 2
1+
1.2s + 1 1.2 seconds
5
e ss=lim sE(s) = 2.14
s®0 1 + 1.33
1+ Kp G(s)R(s) = 0
In our case:
andthediagramis:
s
Subject Examination:
June 2007
3.5 hours.
Problem 1
The properties of the fluid are largely constant in the temperature range of
operation and it is known that when the system is in steady state, the flow of
The input is 2 l/min, the amplifier current is 4A and the input temperature
If it is 20ºC, then the exit temperature is 28ºC.
TI T
R
q
I
Amplifier
u
It is requested:
a) Calculate a mathematical model of the process that relates the main variables.
It is assumed that the amplifier has a linear and fast response.
b) Propose a regulation scheme with ISA nomenclature and draw it
corresponding block diagram indicating the transfer functions.
c) Tune an output temperature regulator with the criterion of obtaining a
response to reference changes in jump without steady-state error and with a time
of closed loop settling time of 12min. in an operating point environment
as previously indicated.
d) If the inflow rate experiences sinusoidal changes like those in figure 2,
(Time in min.) How will the outlet temperature evolve in closed loop?
2.5
2.4
2.3
2.2
2.1
1.9
1.8
1.7
1.6
1.5
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
e) If the gain of the regulator is increased from its design value, how
the closed-loop response of the system will evolve in response to step changes in the
input temperature?
Problem 2
In the scheme of the figure, a certain amounts of liquid product A are to be processed.
which requires heating it to a temperature of 90ºC in a gas-powered oven and
keep the product in a tank for a residence time of 20 min. It is known that the
Gas supply pressure experiences significant changes.
It is requested:
Air
gas
Subject Exam:
June 2007
1 h.
Questions
a) Could you apply PID controllers in the control of a multivariable system whose
RGA out:? Justify the answer.
[ y1 y2 y3 ]
⎡ u1 ⎤⎡
0.8− 1.2 1.4 ⎤
⎢ u2− ⎥⎢ 1.2 0.9 1.3 ⎥
⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥
⎥⎢1.4
⎣⎢ u3 ⎦⎣ 1.3− 1.7 ⎦⎥
If so, what would be the best combination of input/output bindings?
b) What is the place of the roots and what can it be used for?
c) What can you say about the type of response to a step change in the input
what would a system whose transfer function would be:
(s+ 2)e−3s ?
s 2+ s+1
a) Calculate a mathematical model of the process that relates the main variables.
It will be assumed that the amplifier has a linear and fast response.
dT I 2R
V = q(T−T)+
I
with V, R,ρ,ce= cte.
dt ρce
8-0
I= (um−4)= 0.5(um−with umenmA
20-4
8-0 16
I= u= 0.08 ucon u in %
20-4100
In steady state:
42R R
0 = 2(20−28)+ ⇒ =16/16=1
ρce ρce
8−0
4= (u− ⇒ u0=12mA= 50%
20−4
therefore:
dT
10 = q(T−T)+
i
0.0064u2 T in °C
Ti T
TT
R
I
u
Amplifier TC
dt
f(T,T,T,q,I)=
I
0
∂f ∂f ∂f ∂f ∂f
(T−T0) + (T−T0) + −T)+ (q−q0) + (u−u0) = 0
∂T 0 ∂T 0 ∂Ti 0 i i0 ∂q0 ∂u0
d ΔT
V = −q 0 ΔT+ q 0 ΔTI+ I0− T0)Δq+ 0.0128 micro0 Δu
dt
V dΔT (T− T)
i0 0 0.0128u0
+ ΔT= ΔT+I Δq+ Δu
q0dt q0 q0
dΔT
τ + ΔT= K1ΔT+ i
K 2 Δq+ K 3 Δu
dt
dΔT
5 + ΔT= ΔT−i 4Δq+ 0.32Δu
dt
and taking Laplace transforms, the transfer functions result:
K1 K2 K3
T(s)= TI(s)+ Q(s)+ U(s)
τs+ 1 τs+ 1 τs + 1
T in °C
1 −4 0.32
T(s)= Ti(s)+ Q(s)+ U(s)
5s+ 1 5s+ 1 5s+ 1
2 −8 0.64
T(s)= Ti(s)+ Q(s)+ U(s) T in % of the span, u in %
5s+ 1 5s+ 1 5s+ 1
Q(s) Ti(s)
−8 2
5s+ 1 5s+ 1
w E(s) U(s)
0.64 T(s)
R(s)
5s+ 1
c) Tuning an output temperature regulator with the criterion of achieving a
response to reference changes in jump without steady-state error and with a time of
closed-loop settling time of 12 minutes in an operating point environment before
indicated.
Depending on the tuning objective, we can use the criterion ofλ-tuning of Rivera-
Morari IMC, with a PI or a PID. Theλ desired would have to be 12/3 = 4 min. which
meets the minimumλ 0.2τ = 0.2 * 5 = 1
In our case, the delay is zero, then the tuning criterion gives:
2τ + d 5
Kp= = = 1.953 % / %
2Kλ 0.64*4
Ti= τ + d/ 2= 5 min
1 5s+ 1
being the same for a PID it results in Td= 0. R(s)= k p(1+ ) = 1.953
Tis 5s
2.4
2.3
2.2
2.1
1.9
1.8
1.7
1.6
1.5
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
− 40s
T(s)= Q(s)
(5s+ 1)(5s+ 1.235)
f) If the gain of the regulator is increased from its design value, how
the closed-loop response of the system will evolve in response to step changes in the
input temperature?
Since
2
5s+ 1 10s
T(s)= Ti(s)= Ti(s)
0.64 5s+ 1 (5s+ 1)(5s+ 0.64kp)
1+ kp
5s+ 1 5s
The system has a pole at -1/5, another at -0.64kp/5 that will become more negative, and
it will always be real, as the profitpincrease, just like a zero in 0.
Note that a zero at s=0 produces a response that is the derivative of the same.
response without the zero. The response if there were no zero would be that of a second system
overdamped order increasingly faster that would bring its response closer to that of a first
first-order system with a time constant of 5, and therefore, with a settling time of 15 minutes.
So in response to a jump in the input temperature, the response will be:
Without zero
With zero
Problem 2 Solution
B TT
FT
FT FC + TC
TT TY
A
T TC Tm
TT
FT FC
Air TC
FF τ/S
FC HS
FT FC
FT LC LT
Gas
FF
Problems of "Control and Instrumentation of Chemical Processes"
4th Chemical Engineering
Problem 3
U
Ti T
Changer
q
The system in the figure represents a heat exchanger with an internal heating system.
non-manipulable that heats a flow q of water from a temperature T to a temperature T. I
For this system, it is known that the relationship between the control signal to the inlet valve U in
% and the output temperatureTin ºC (time in minutes) is given by:
dT
3 -6T + 8.8U2+2TI
dt
and that when the system is in steady state and the inlet temperature is 10 ºC,
The outlet is 40ºC.
It is requested:
2) Assume that the regulator is of the PI type, draw a block diagram and calculate the
transfer function in closed loop neglecting the dynamics of the transmitter.
3) If the regulator gain is 0.1 and the integral time is 1 minute, study the stability of
system and the form of the response to a step change in the reference.
4) Calculate the steady-state error in response to a jump of 0.2 ºC in the input temperature.
liquid.
1) To control the temperature, the only option is to act on the flow of liquid to
through the valve, then the control system should be as in the figure, where it has been
installedatemperaturetransmitterandacontrollerthatmanipulatesthevalve:
TC TT
U TI
Changer
q T
dT
3 -6T + 8.8U2+2Ti
dt
0 = -6*40 + 8.8U02+2*10
U 0(240-20)/8.8 = 5%
T040ºC
Ti 0 10 degrees Celsius
dT
3 = -6T + 8.8U2+2TI
dt
dDT
3 = -6DT+(2*8.8U0)DU+2DT I
dt
-6DT + 88DU + 2DTi
conDT=T - TDU=U-U
0 0DT=T
i iTi0
So taking Fourier transforms on both sides of the equal sign, it results in:
3sDT(s) = -6DT(s) + 88DU(s) + 2DT(s)i
3sDT(s) + 6DT(s) = 88DU(s) + 2DT(s)I
88 2
DT(s) DU(s)+ DTi (s)
3s+6 3s+6
And now, taking into account that the transfer function of a PI regulator is:
1
Kp(1+ )
Tis
Is it possible to draw the closed-loop diagram:
DTI
2
3s + 6
w error YOU DT
1 88
K p(1+ )
Ti s 3s + 6
andcalculatetheclosed-looptransferfunction:
88 2 88 T s+1 2
DT(s) = DU(s)+ DT(s)=
i K p( i (W(s)-DT(s))+ DT(s)
i
3s + 6 3s+6 3s+6 Tis 3s + 6
é 88 Tis+1 ù 88 T s+1 2
ê1 + 3s + 6 Kp( T s )DT(s)= ú Kp( I )W(s)+ DT(s)
i
ë i û 3s+6 Ti 3s+6
88 T s+1 2
Kp ( i )
3s+6 Ti 3s + 6
DT(s)= W(s)+ DTi
88 TIs+1 88 Tis+1
1+ K p( ) 1+ K p( )
3s+6 Tis 3s+6 Tis
K p 88(Tis+1) 2Tis
= W(s)+ DT(s)
i
(3s+6)Ts+K
i p 88(Ti s+1) (3s+6)T is+Kp88(Tis+1)
3) Assigning values to the parameters of the PI according to the statement:
8.8(s+1) 2s
DT(s)= W(s)+ DT(s)=
i
(3s+6)s+8.8(s+1) (3s + 6)s + 8.8(s + 1)
8.8(s+1) 2s
= 2 W(s)+ 2
DT(s)
i
3s +14.8s+8.8 3s +14.8s+8.8
and the stability in closed loop can be calculated using the roots of:
3s2+14.8s + 8.8 = 0
-14.8±14.82-4 3 8.8
s 1,2 = -0.69,-4.24
6
Since both are real and negative, the response to a change in the reference would be stable and
withoutoscillations,withapointofinflection,althoughnotverypronouncedduetothepresenceofapole
(-4.24) quite a bit faster than the other (-0.69). The settling time will be imposed by the
the slowest pole will be on the order of 3/0.69 = 4.34 min for a 5% criterion (4/0.69 = 5.79
minimum for a criterion of 1%. However, since the system also has a zero in the loop
closed at s = -1, a lead will occur. The gain is 1. The
Total response is shown in the figure.
Step Response
From:U(1)
1
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
0 1.4 2.8 4.2 5.6 7
Time (sec.)
-2s 0.2
e ss =lim sE(s) =lim s =0
s®0 s®0 2
3s +14.8s+8.8 s
A B
vapor Reactor
Changer
The figure shows an endothermic chemical reactor in which two products A and B
react at a certain temperature to form product C, which, after being heated in the
heat exchanger, is temporarily stored in a tank. The liquid exits through
rebose of the reaction chamber so it is always full of products, while the
heating chamber receives a steam whose pressure experiences strong changes and exits as
condensed. The flow of product B is not manipulable.
Design a control system that is capable of accurately maintaining the final temperature
of product C, as well as its concentration. Install the instrumentation, transmitters and
actuators, necessary and explain their operation.
Solution:
FT FC FF FT
A
B
TC TT
TC TT
vapor
Reactor
AC
AT
TT
Changer
PC PT LT
TC LC
This means that the output flow of the reactor is imposed, and the only alternative for
installing the tank level control is done by acting on its output.
The temperature control of C after the heat exchanger is also implemented as another cascade.
whoseinternalbondisoneofvaporpressureforthesamereason.
The composition control of C is carried out using an analyzer for its measurement and acting
about the proportion of both products, which can thus be corrected if the
the composition of C is not suitable.
Note that both the temperature and the composition of C could be measured in the tank.
this would include in the control loop the possible disturbances that occurred in it and
it would act as a filter for quick changes, although it would also introduce an additional element
slowthatwouldmakethesystem'sresponselessagile.
Problems of 'Control and Instrumentation of Chemical Processes'
4th Chemical Engineering Course
Problem 5
The figure shows a diagram of an endothermic reactor where two are introduced.
products A and B, which react to form another C, which are maintained notably
constants.
A B
valve
An experiment has been carried out consisting of increasing the opening of the intake valve
of vapor by 10% and record the change in the temperature of the reactor when the others
variables were constant, which can be seen in the graph, where it is supposed that the
The reactor temperature was initially at the value marked as 0. The scale of
the temperature is in ºC and the duration in minutes. The temperature transmitter was calibrated
in the range of 0-80 ºC.
r
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0 5 10 15
It is requested:
1) Calculate a dynamic model that relates the reactor temperature to the opening of
thevalve,usingunits%/%forthegain.
2) Calculate the settling time and the oscillation frequency and compare them with the
values that can be estimated from the model.
3) Design the simplest temperature controller that provides the following
characteristics: no steady-state error, without or with very little overshoot and with a time of
settlementofabout5minutes.
Solution:
1) Since the only information is the answer to a jumping essay, we will use that.
graph to deduce an approximate linear model. From the shape of the response, with
overshoot and oscillation and without delay, it is deduced that we can choose a model of
second order of the type:
Kwn2
s 2+2dw +n wn2
r
6
5%
8.5
5
4
The gain K is calculated by the quotient of the change in temperature in state
stationary, 50ºC, and the change in the valve opening 10%. As units are requested in
To convert 50ºC to a percentage scale, we need to consider that 80ºC is 100%.
ofthetransmitter.
To calculate the value of damping we will use the overshoot measurement. The value of the
The peak is 8.5 ºC and in % over the final value: 8.5 100 /50 = 17 % and it is known that the
the relationship of this value with damping is given by:
- dp
1- d2
100e
therefore:
-dp
1- d2
-dp d2 p 2
e -1.771956 ; (-1.772)2=
1- d 2 1- d 2
1.318d2=0.318;d =0.491
To calculate the undamped natural frequencynwe will use peak time. The time
the peak is 3.53 min and it is known to be related to the parameters of the function of
transfer by:
p
tp =
wn1- d 2
therefore:
p
3.53= ;wn1 . 0 2
wn1 - 0 . 4 9 1 2
and the resulting transfer function between changes in temperature and position of the
valveturnsouttobein%/%:
6.5
s +s+1.04
2
The oscillation period obtained from the graph is approximately 2(7.5 - 3.53) =
7.94 min. Thus, the oscillation frequency will be: 2p/7.94 = 0.79 rad/min. Being difficult
make the measurements accurately on the graph due to the flat shape of the descending oscillation.
What are values close to those measured. In particular, please note that the calculation of
settlement time through 3/dwnin second order systems it is just an expression
approximate. It should also be noted that the response of the graph is being
approximating it for a second order system, but the statement does not say it is
exactly a second-order system.
3) To design the requested regulator, we must first choose its type. Having
It should be noted that the process has no integrators; to eliminate the steady-state error, it will be necessary to ...
a PI or PID regulator. On the other hand, given the type of transfer function and the
design specifications, it is not possible to apply the Ziegler-Nichols rules or tables
Rovira, Lopez or Morari. An applicable design procedure is to obtain a phase margin.
(related to the overshoot) at a given frequency (related to the speed of
response). If you want the closed-loop system to have a slight or no overshoot
A phase margin of about 55º can be taken. To estimate the frequency at which one wants
obtain this phase margin for the process-regulator set, given that the time of
the required settlement is slightly lower than open loop, we will take a frequency
slightly superior to that of open-loop control.
In the case of a PI, it is about obtaining certain values of the gain and the integral time of the
a regulator such that the phase margin of G(jw)R(jw) is 55º at the frequency of 1.2
f
-
w
G(jw)R(jw)
Once the PI regulator parameters have been obtained, and since there is no exact relationship
for the resulting third-order system with a zero, the settling time would be
It is convenient to verify in simulation that the closed-loop system obtained meets the
specifications.
Another design alternative is a direct synthesis procedure. If we take as
desired behavior in closed loop a first-order transfer function
(overdamped) with unit gain and time constant l = 5/3 = 1.66, we can
calculate the regulator R(s) that gives that function M(s) in closed loop:
1 1 Kwn2 6.5
M(s)= = G(s)= =
ls+1 1.66s +1 s +2dwns+ wns + s + 1 . 0 4
2 2 2
1
M(s) ls+1 +2dws+nwn2
2
R(s)= = = =
G(s)(1-M(s)) Kwn2 1 Kwn2 (ls+1-1)
(1- )
2
+2dws+nwn2 ls+1
s 2+2dws+n w22
n /wn+(2d/wn )s+1
2
= = =
Kwls
2
Kls
2d(2d/wn) (1/2 dw) s2+(2d/w n)s+1
= n
wn Kl (2d/wn)s
2D 2d 1
Kp= Ti= Td =
w nKl wn 2dw
K p (TT
i d s +Ts+1)
2
i
PID ideal=
Tsi
MatchingtermstoanidealPID
The process in the figure represents a heating furnace for a material, which enters into
temperature T and iit must come out at temperature T. In the oven, the flow F can be manipulated.
heating element to make the final temperature T of the material reach the values
desired.
Ti Oven T
It is known that the relationship between the temperature T, the input temperature of the material T and the i
flow F is given by:
dT
(5+3F) +2T2=3FT+T i
dt
withTandTi in ºC, F in Kg/min and time in minutes, and when the system is in state
stationary at 40ºC the inlet temperature is 10ºC. The request is:
Solution:
1) Given that the system model is nonlinear, to obtain the transfer function between
the outputT, the input F and the possible disturbanceTwe must linearize
i this model.The point
Thelinearization,accordingtothestatement,istheequilibriumpointthatverifies:
2T2=3FT+Ti; 2 402=3F040+10; F0=3190/120=26.6 Kg/min
withwhatsaidpointoflinearizationturnsouttobe:
dT
(5+3F) +2T2-3FT-T i=0 f (T,T,F,T
& i=0
dt
¶f ¶f ¶f
Linearization is an expression of the type: DT+
& DT+ DF+ DT=0
I
¶T&0 ¶T 0 ¶F 0 ¶T i 0
whereDT=T& - &0T
;DT=T
& - 0T;DF=F - 0F;DTI=TiTi0with what:
(5+3F0)DT+(4T
& 0-3F )DT+(3T
0 0-3T&
0 )DF-DT i=0
dDT
84.8 +80.2DT=120DF+DTi
dt
ì dDT ü
84.8Lí ý +80.2L {DT} =120L {DF} +L {DTI }
î dt þ
84.8T(s) + 80.2T(s) = 120F(s) + T(s) where
i
T(s) = L {DT}, F(s) =L {DF}, Ti (s)=L {DTi }
(84.8s+80.2)T(s)=120F(s)+T(s) I
andthetransferfunctionturnsouttobe:
Theregulationdiagramis:
T
TI
Process
TT
F
U
TC
and the block diagram:
Ti
0.0125
1.06s + 1
W E T
U F
1 1.5
0.1(1+ ) 1
(20/60)s 1.06s + 1
G(s)R(s) D(s)
T(s) = W(s)+ Ti (s)=
1 + G(s)R(s) 1+G(s)R(s)
1.5 0.1s +0.3 0.0125
= 1.06s + 1 W(s)+ 1.06s + 1 T (s)=
1.5 0.1s +0.3 1.5 0.1s +0.3i
1+ 1+
1.06s + 1 s 1.06s + 1 s
0.15s + 0.45 0.0125s
= W(s)+ Ti (s)
1.06s2+1.15s+0.45 1.06s2+1.15s+0.45
and the stability in closed loop can be studied by calculating the poles in closed loop, this
yes, the roots of:
3) If the regulator's gain were variable instead of 0.1, the transfer function in
closed loop would be:
1.5 s+3 0.0125
Kp
T(s)= 1.06s + 1 s W(s)+ 1.06s + 1 T (s)=
1.5 s+3 1.5 s+3 i
1+ Kp 1+ Kp
1.06s + 1 s 1.06s + 1 s
1.5Kps+4.5Kp 0.0125s
= W(s)+ TI(s)
1.06 seconds (1+1.5Kp)s+4.5Kp
2
1.06 seconds2+(1+1.5Kp)s+4.5Kp
and stability would be given in terms of the roots of:
that is between Kp= 0.0627 and 7.08 the roots s will be imaginary and the stability condition
Itshouldbethattherealpartofthemisnegative,inotherwords,itshouldbefulfilled:
for which the absolute value of the radicand must be less in absolute value than 1 + 1.5Kpthe
which holds for any Kppositive, so that the system will be stable for any
Kp0
1.06 4.5Kp
4.5Kp>0 ; 1+1.5KpSo Kpgreater than zero
1+1.5Kp
5) A lead compensator can be used, since the dynamics of the output in response to
changes in the disturbance T are noti faster than changes in the manipulated variable
U. The transfer function of the compensator will be given by:
0.0125
-D(s)
G F(s)= = 1.06s + 1 -0.008
G(s) 1.5
1.06s+1
andwouldcorrespondtothefollowingscheme:
T
TI
Process
TT
TT
F
U
TC
TY
TI
0.0125
1.06s + 1
-0.008
W E T
1 U
1.5
0.1(1+ )
(20/60)s 1.06s + 1
Examination of the Subject "Control and Instrumentation of Chemical Processes"
4th year of Chemical Engineering
Problem 7
In a drying process, a certain constant flow of material is introduced into the dryer, along with
with a flow of hot gas, whose flow rate can be manipulated through the signal to
afansystem.Inanexperimentconsistingofreducingthesignaltothefanby10%
from a position of equilibrium, a change in the moisture of the material has been observed
like the one in the figure. The transmitter is calibrated with a span of 5 units. Units of
timeinminutes.
It is requested:
1) Given that the only information is the response to an essay in jump, we will use it.
graph to deduce an approximate linear model. In the shape of the response, with overshoot
and oscillation and without delay, it is deduced that we can choose a second-order model of
type:
Kwn2
2
+2dw + w 2
n n
0.1 0.83
1.1
To calculate the damping value, we will use the overshoot measurement. The value of the
The overshoot is 0.1 units and in % of the final value: 0.1 100 / 0.83 = 12% and it is known.
that the relationship of this value with the damping is given by:
- dp
1- d2
100e
therefore:
-dp
1- d2
-dp d2 p 2
e =0.12; ln( 0.12)= ; (-2.12)2=
1- d 2 1- d 2
14.36d2=4.495;d =0.56
To calculate the undamped natural frequencynwe will use peak time. The time
The peak is 1.1 min and it is known to be related to the parameters of the function of
transfer by:
p
t p=
wn1- d 2
therefore:
p
1.1= ;wn 3.44
wn1-0.562
andtheresultingtransferfunctionbetweenthechangesintemperatureandpositionofthe
valveturnsouttobein%/%:
-19.64
s 2+3.86s+11.8
W E Y
U -19.64
Kp 2
s +3.86s+11.8
-19.64Kp
G(s)R(s) s 2+3.86s+11.8 -19.64Kp
Y(s)= W(s)= W(s)= W(s)
1 + G(s)R(s) -19.64Kp s 2+3.86s+11.8-19.64Kp
1+ 2
+3.86s+11.8
1 1 s 2+3.86s+11.8 20
E(s)= W(s)=
1+G(s)R(s) -19.64Kp 2
+3.86s+11.8-19.64Kp
1+
s 2+3.86s+11.8
s 2+3.86s+11.8 20 11.8 20
e ss=lim s 2 = = 1 Þ K p-11.41
s®0 s +3.86s +11.8 -19.64Kp 11.8-19.64Kp
U(s)=R(s)(W(s)-Y(s))=R(s)(W(s)-G(s)U(s))
R(s) Kp Kp(s2+3.86s+11.8)
U(s)= W(s)= W(s)= W(s)
1+G(s)R(s) -19.64Kp 2
+3.86s+11.8-19.64Kp
1+
s 2+3.86s+11.8
K p(s2+3.86s+11.8) 20 20Kp 11.8
u =lim sU(s)=lim s = -11.41
s®0 s®0 s +3.86s+11.8-19.64Kp
2
s 11.8-19.64Kp
4) The response of the closed-loop system to sinusoidal changes in the reference will also be
sine wave of the same period 0.1 min, but with an amplitude and phase shift that will be given in
magnitudeandphasefunctionoftheclosedlooptransferfunctionatthefrequency2π/0.1
= 20p. To calculate them, we will substitute s with j20p in the same, we will assign Kp-11.41
andwewillcalculatethemodulusandargumentoftheresultingcomplexnumber:
G(jw)R(jw) -19.64Kp
= 2 =
1 + G(jw)R(jw)
s=20pj
s +3.86s +11.8 -19.64Kp
s=20pj
-19.64(-11.41) 224.2
=
2j(0)+3.86j20+11.8-19.64(-11.41)-164+77.2j
2
s 2+3.86s+11.8-19.64Kp=0
-3.86±3.862-4(11.8-19.64K p) -3.86± - 32.3 + 78.56K
p
s= =
2 2
-3.86±5.68 j
For Kp= 0 result:
2
Since the process has a negative gain, the controller must also have it. If this were not the case,
When humidity increases, the flow of hot gas would decrease, operating in the opposite manner.
What is expected to correct the deviations. When K takes negative p values each time.
greater, the radicand will be negative, so we will have the same negative real part -
3.86/2 and an imaginary part that will become increasingly larger. The resulting diagram is:
This means that for any negative value of the gain, the response will be of type
subamortigued, since the roots are complex conjugates. Furthermore, the time of
settlementwillbesimilar,havingallthesamerealpart.Whenitdecreasesnegatively
profit also comes from the imaginary part, so that the frequency of the oscillations
it will be increasingly greater, just like the peak.
Problem 8
It is known that the transfer functions relating the two inputs and two outputs of a
the process are:
2 2 s-1 2
G 11= G 12 = G 21= G 22 =
s+1 2
s +3s+1 2
+4s+2 3s+1
u1 y1
u2 y2
It is desired to know:
1) To install two SISO controllers, what will be the best pairing of inputs and
outputs?
2) Would that form of regulation be advisable?
3) Assuming that unit gain proportional controllers are placed, what will be the
transfer function that relates output 1 with the inputs of both regulators?
Solution
1) The measure of interaction and the best way to match inputs and outputs can
study oneself with the relative profitability matrix of Bristol. For this, it must be found
previouslytheprofitmatrix.
The profits between the inflows and outflows can be obtained from the functions of
transfer
2 1 2 1
m
il s m
il s
k 11=
s®0 s + 1s =2; k 12 =
s®0 s +3s+1 s =2;
2
1 1
s-1 1 2 1
m
il s m
il s
k 21 =
s®0 s 2
+4 seconds +2 seconds
-0.5 k 22 =
s®0 3s+1s =2
1 1
é 2 2ù
so that: K= ê-0.5 2 ú
ë û
To calculate the RGA, we will calculate one of its elements, for example11andthenestimatethe
others using the properties of the RGA:
k 11k 22 2 2
l 11 = = 0.8 l 12 =1- l11=0.2;
k 11k 22-k12k 212 2 -2(-0.5)
l 21=1- l11=0.2;=1- l =0.8;l 22 21
é0.8 0.2ù
then: RGA= ê0.2 0.8ú
ë û
Now, clearly the best way to associate inputs and outputs is to control output 1 with the
input 1 and output 2 should be regulated with input 2, since the corresponding term of the
RGA (0.8) is closer to 1, so the interaction between the resulting loops will be
minor. The other association, output 1 regulated with input 2 and output 2 regulated with the
Entry 1 has a value of 0.2 in the RGA, which means that, since 0.2 = 2/10, there is
a 500% gain change in a bond of that association when the other switches from
manualtoautomaticandviceversa,whichisnotacceptable.
u1 y1
R1
Process
R2
u2
y2
2) In this case, the change in gain in one loop when the other switches between automatic and
it is manual, taking into account that 0.8 = 8/10, in the same proportion as going from 8 to 10,
Whatisanadmissiblechangeandamultivariablecontrollerwouldprobablynotbenecessary.
3) To calculate this transfer function, we will start from the block diagram:
y1
G11
w1 u1
R1 G21
R2
w2 u2 G12
G22
y2
And operating:
y1=G11u 1+G12 u 2=
=G11R 1 1-y1 ) + G12R 2(w2-y2)
y 2=G21u 1+G22 u 2=
=G21R 1 (w 1-y1 ) + G22R 2(w2-y2)
G11R1 G12R 2
y1= w 1+ (w 2-y2)
1 + G 11R1 1 + G 11R1
G21R1 G 22R 2
y 2= (w 1-y1)+ w2
1+G 22R 2 1+G 22R 2
Now, replacing R and R1 with 2Kp1y Kp2as well as assigning values to the functions of
transferG:
2 2 s-1 2
G 11= G 12 = G 21= G 22 =
s+1 2
s +3s+1 2
s +4s+2 3s+1
Problem 9
PT PC
gas
The system normally operates at a pressure of 3 bar in the storage tank and with
a 30% valve signal. It is known that the system, in open loop, in the face of a change in the
signal to the valve from 30% to 35% gives a temporary response in pressure similar to that of the
Figure, where time is shown in seconds, and pressure in bars, with the transmitter calibrated.
in the range of 1-5 bar.
It is requested:
1) Design a regulator that does not exhibit steady-state error in response to step changes in the
reference, and to minimize the deviation in time on it by correcting possible
perturbations.
2) Calculate the steady-state error that would be obtained with the designed regulator if the reference of
Pressurevariesaccordingtotheequation3+0.4t.
3)Iftheregulatorisplacedinmanualpositionandsinusoidalchangesof2%amplitudearegiven
and period pi/2 sg, to the manual control signal around the value of 30%, what would be the evolution
What is the pressure temporal when a steady state situation is reached?
It is known that the relationship between the temperature of the product that arrives at the device
storage at ºC and the pressure in bars, for a valve opening of 30%,
is given by:
dp
1800 =(-3p2+30)T(t-0.4)-30
dt
How would we modify the previous control scheme to eliminate the effect of the possible
temperature changes of the product concerning pressure? Calculate the parameters of the
new control scheme to meet the specifications of 1) and 4).
Solution
The system, based on the form of the response, shows that it does not have open-loop integrators.
so that a regulator does not present steady-state error in response to changes in the reference
It must be of type PI or PID. On the other hand, the design criterion of the statement is to minimize
the integral of the error modulus (MIAE) in the face of disturbances.This is the criterion used in the
tuning tables of Lopez et al. that apply to underdamped response processes in
open loop, like that of the problem, as shown in the figure. The method of the tables of
Lopez is based on the knowledge of a first-order model with delay of the process of
tipo
Ke - ds
ts+1
Where K is the gain, d is the delay, and t is the time constant. The response of our
the process is not of this type, but it can be approximated by a model of this class.
The profit is calculated in the usual way, by the quotient between the change in output in
steady state and the change in the input. To determine the time constant and the
We can follow several methods, the most common one is based on drawing the tangent line to
the response curve of greatest slope, then determining the intersection points of the
samewithparallelsatthestartandendpoints.Theresultcanbeseeninthefigure:
0.3 1.9
2.8125
d = 0.3 sg. t = 1.9 - 0.3 = 1.6 sg. and the estimated model is:
Another procedure is to calculate the moments in time when 28.3% is reached and the
63.2%ofthefinalvalueandapplythecorrespondingestimationformulas:
0.75 1.4
2.9469=
28.3%
2.8815=
63.2%
2.8125
In this case t2= 1.4 sg, t1= 0.75 sg. so that:
t = 1.5(t2–t1) = 0.975 sg; d = t2-t = 0.425 sg. and the model obtained with this approximation
-0.94e- 0.42s
0.98s + 1
Both are valid, considering that they are first-order type approximations with
delay of a higher-order overdamped system.
Now we can apply Lopez's tables for parallel PI controllers. First of all
we verify that they are applicable when d/t = 0.3 / 1.6 < 1 (and the same for the other
model). Now to calculate the gain Kpwewillusetheformulafromtheregulator:
b
æd ö
K p K =a ç ÷
èt ø
For which the Lopez tables, following the MIAE criteria, provide us with the values:
Criterion Proportional Integral
whileforthetotaltimeTtheformulaisused: I
b
t æd ö
=a ç ÷
Ti èt ø
for which Lopez's table gives the values: a = 0.608, b = -0.707, which leads to:
-0.707
1 1 æ0.3 ö
= 0.608ç ÷ THi0.8sg.
TI1.6 è 1.6 ø
In the same way, the other model could have been used, which would have led to: Kp= -
2.41; Ti = 0.89
2) If the reference pressure varies according to 3 + 0.4 t, since the equilibrium point is 3 bars, the
Change in reference is 3 + 0.4t - 3 = 0.4t bars = 0.4t 100/(5-1) = 10t in %.
the expression of the error is:
1 1 10
E(s)= W(s)= =
1+G(s)R(s) -0.94e- 0.3s K p(Ts I+1) s2
1+
1.6s+1 Tsi
(1.6s+1)0.8s 10
(1.6s+1)0.8s-0.94e- 0.3s (-5.45)(0.8s+1)s2
(1.6s + 1)0.8s 10 0.8 10
e ss =lim s = 1.56%
s®0 (1.6s + 1)0.8s - 0.94e (-5.45)(0.8s+1)s -0.94(-5.45)
- 0.3s 2
3) If sinusoidal changes occur in open loop around 30% of the signal to the valve, the
pressure will oscillate sinusoidally around the equilibrium point of 3 bars, after a
a certain time with a frequency equal to that of the control signal 2pi/(pi/2) = 4 rad/s. and with
anamplitudeandphaseshiftthatdependonthemodulusandargumentofthetransferfunctionat
that frequency:
That is, it will oscillate with an amplitude of 2. 0.145 = 0.29%, a frequency of 4 rad/s and a phase shift.
regarding the command signal of -5.57 rad = 1.44 s.
dp
1800+(3p2-30)T+30=0 f (p,p,T)=0
&
dt
¶f ¶f ¶f
linearization is an expression of the type: DT=0 Dp+
& Dp+
&0 0 0
dDp
1800 +180Dp=3DT(t-0.4)
ì dDp ü
1800Lí ý +180L {Dp} =3L {DT(t-0.4) }
î dt þ
1800sP(s) + 180P(s) = 3e- 0.4s T(s) where T(s)=L {DT(t) },P(s)=L },
(1800s+180)P(s)=3e- 0.4s T(s)
andthetransferfunctionturnsouttobe:
Since the dynamics of the response to changes in the disturbance T is not faster (greater
time constant 10 versus 1.6 and greater delay, 0.4 versus 0.3) in response to changes in the
Manipulated variable U can use a feedforward compensator to eliminate the
disturbance
andwouldcorrespondtothefollowingscheme:
T
0.416e- 0.4s
10s+1
0.44e- 0.1s(1.6s+1)
10s+1
W E P
U -0.94e- 0.3s
1
-5.45(1+ )
0.8s 1.6s + 1
Sincetheleadcompensatordoesnotalterthedynamicsofthecontrolloop,itwouldnotbe
Itisnecessarytomodifythetuningoftheregulatortomaintainthespecificationsof1)
PC
TY
TT
gas
Problem 10
A tubular reactor like the one in the figure carries out the conversion of some reactants R that are
they are previously mixed with other S and are introduced from their lower part after passing through a
preheater to produce product A. The reactants have a concentration
constant. The flow of reagents R is imposed by other parts of the process. The reactor does not
it has manipulable variables, although one can significantly act on the
concentration of productAthrough the inlet temperature using the preheater.
This uses water vapor as a heating fluid that partially heats the reactants and
then it is used for other purposes with variable demand.Ascheme is desired to be designed for
control that allows maintaining the concentration of A as precisely as possible.
Justify the proposed scheme.
reactor
S
R
vapor
Solution
Thepointsthatmustbeconsideredinthedesignofthecontrolsystemarethefollowing:
The concentration ofAis influenced by the proper ratio between the flows of R and S. For this purpose
a control ratio must be established between both magnitudes. Since the flow of R is imposed,
the only alternative is to measure it and act with a ratio on the setpoint of a control loop
flow of S. Note that the concentration of R and S is constant according to the statement. Note
also that, in this way, the total flow that reaches the reactor is preset by R and the control
ratio.
To regulate the concentration of productA, the only manipulated variable is the temperature.
preheater outlet. In turn, to be able to set that temperature we need a system
of temperature control of the output of the preheater. Therefore, the control scheme
it will include a control loop for the concentration ofA, in cascade with a control loop
of the preheater temperature. The concentration ofAcan be measured with an analyzer
online.
And operating:
y1=G11u 1+G12 u 2=
=G11R 1 1-y1 ) + G12R 2(w2-y2)
y 2=G21u 1+G22 u 2=
=G21R 1 (w 1-y1 ) + G22R 2(w2-y2)
G11R1 G12R 2
y1= w 1+ (w 2-y2)
1 + G 11R1 1 + G 11R1
G21R1 G 22R 2
y 2= (w 1-y1)+ w2
1+G 22R 2 1+G 22R 2
Now, replacing R and R1 with 2Kp1y Kp2as well as assigning values to the functions of
transferG:
2 2 s-1 2
G 11= G 12 = G 21= G 22 =
s+1 2
s +3s+1 2
s +4s+2 3s+1
Problem 23
In Fig. 1, a process can be seen where a controllable currentAenters and another current
non-manipulable B. CurrentAcan be regulated through a flow control system.
as seen in the figure. When the setpoint z of the regulator is increased by 2 l/min
flow of A, starting from a certain steady state of the entire system, the response that is
The density of the output product can be seen in Fig. 2. In this figure, the
Time axis units are minutes and density units are Kg/l, and the latter is measured with a
transmitter calibrated in the range of 0.5-3 kg/l to provide a signal of 4-20 mA. Similarly
TheflowtransmitterAiscalibratedintherangeof0-20l/min.
FT FC
r
process
A
Fig. 1
It is requested:
1.45
1.4
1.35
1.3
1.25
1.2
1.15
1.1
1.05
1
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3
Time (min)
Fig.2
Solution
1) In view of the statement of the problem, we must obtain the requested mathematical model.
starting from the response curve of Fig.2. Since it is a process
overdamped, we can try to approximate the response to that of a first-order system.
order with delay:
Ke - ds
ts+1
To estimate this model, the profit is calculated in the usual way, by the quotient between
the change in steady-state output and the change in input.
100
(1.417-1)
2.5 18.8 %
K= = 1.88
100 10 %
2
20-0
To determine the time constant and delay, we can follow several methods, the most
common is based on drawing the tangent line to the curve of response with the greatest slope,
then determining the intersections of it with parallels at the starting points and
final.Theresultcanbeseeninthefigure:
1.374
1.45
1.417
1.4
1.35
1.3
1.25
1.2
1.15
1.1
1.05
1
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3
Time (min)
0.22
Fig.3
From where it is deduced:
d = 0.22 sg. t = 1.374 - 0.22 = 1.15 sg. and the estimated model is:
1.88e- 0.22s
r(s)= z(s)
1.15s + 1
2) A schematic of a density control system can be seen in Fig. 4. It incorporates a
density transmitter and a regulator that acts in cascade on the flow reference
A.
w
DC
z
FT FC
DT
r
process
A
Fig.4
Since the process does not have integrators in its response to z, the regulator is more
simple that can eliminate steady-state errors in response to setpoint changes is a PI.
according to the requested specifications, we can use the Tables of Lopez et al. with the
MIAE criteria for tuning, as they correspond to the type of identified model, verify
theconditiond/t=022/1.15<1,andtheyconformtotherequestedcriterion.
Now to calculate the profit Kpfromtheregulatorwewillusetheformula:
b
æd ö
K p K =a ç ÷
èt ø
For which the Lopez tables, following the MIAE criteria, provide us with the values:
Criterion Proportional Integral
whileforthetotaltimeTtheformulaisused: i
b
t æd ö
=a ç ÷
Ti èt ø
for which the Lopez table gives the values: a = 0.608, b = -0.707, which leads to:
-0.707
1 1 æ0.22 ö
= 0.608ç ÷ THI=0.59sg.
Ti1.15 è 1.15 ø
B D(s)
%
W% E% r%
z%
1 1.88e - 0.22s
2.67(1+ )
0.59s 1.5s + 1
The output of block D, unknown, must be in %, while the input can be listed
in l/min since we do not know anything about the respective transmitter. From the diagram, it can be deduced that
expression of the transfer functions that relate the density to the reference and the
caudal B:
1.88e- 0.22s 0.59s + 1
2.67
GR D D
r(s)= w+ B= 1.15s +- 0.22 1 0.59s w+ B=
1+GR 1+GR 1.88e seconds
0.59s + 1 1.88e - 0.22s
0.59s+1
1+ 2.67 1+ 2.67
1.15s + 1 0.59s 1.15s + 1 0.59s
1.88e 2.67(0.59s+1)
- 0.22s
0.64s(1.5s+1)D
= w+ B
(1.15s+1)0.59s+1.88e- 0.22s
2.67(0.59s + 1) (1.15s+1)0.59s+1.88e- 0.22s2.67(0.59s+1)
4) The expression of the error in closed loop for a change in B is given by:
D D(s) -0.59s(1.15s+1)D(s)
E(s)= - B= - - 0.22s
B= B
1+GR 1.88e 0.59s + 1 (1.15s + 1)0.59s + 1.88e- 0.22s2.67(0.59s+1)
1+ 2.67
1.15s + 1 0.59s
and the steady-state error in response to a step change in B can be calculated as:
-0.59s(1.15s+1)D(s) 1 -0.59sD(s)
e ss= l imsE(s) = l im s =l im
s®0 s®0 (1.15s + 1)0.59s + 1.88e- 0.22s
2.67(0.59s+1) s s®0 1.88 2.67
To calculate this limit, according to the statement, it is known that D(s) contains an integrator.
that responds monotonically without stabilizing to a step change in B, and
Moreover, it only has an integrator since it reaches a steady value in response to an impulse.
This will cancel the s of the previous expression. In reality, the only information
necessary to solve the problem is related to the steady-state value of the response to a
impulse in B in open loop.This is given by:
100
m
il sDs(1)=2-Kg=l/2- -80%
2.5
-0.59sD(s) (-0.59)(-80)
e ssl imsE(s)=l im = 9.4%
s®0 s®0 1.88 1.88 2.67
5) To calculate the phase margin of the system, the value of the expression MF = must be evaluated.
p+ arg(G(jw)R(jw)) at a frequency value for which | G(jw)R(jw)|=1.
Based on the relationship between phase margin and damping in second order systems
order, the small phase margin found allows us to predict that the response of
the system will have a high overshoot and the degree of robustness will be low in the face of changes in the
processes that increase the system's lag, such as delays and time constants,
thereisadangerofdestabilizationiftheseincreaseforanyreason.
Problem 24
Inthediagramofthefigure,aprocesscanbeseeninwhichacurrentA,notmanipulable
and experiences significant changes, exchanges heat with another liquid C at high
temperature after passing through tank 1. At the supply point of liquid C, the
temperature is noticeably constant, but the pressure undergoes some variations
importance. Current A, after passing through the exchanger, goes to tank 2, where a
part is recycled to deposit 1 through a pumping system that imposes a flow rate
constant and another part, B, is the output of the process. It is desired to maintain the flow rate and temperature.
as constant as possible, as well as ensuring the safety of the process. There is a
overflow system in tank 2 that prevents overflow from being problematic in
said deposit.
It is requested:
Choose the appropriate instrumentation and control loops for it and draw the
corresponding control scheme according to ISAstandards, justifying it.
1 D C
Solution
The regulation objectives are to maintain the flow and temperature of B. Moreover, for reasons
For safety, the levels in both tanks must be regulated and the circulation must be ensured.
1 to 2 through the changer.
The flow rate of B can be maintained using a flow controller and a flow transmitter.
To act on the temperature of B, the simplest way that does not interfere with the others.
circuits, it is to vary the flow of C. However, as the supply pressure of C
significant changes, it is logical to use a cascading structure in which the
temperature regulator acts on the setpoint of a flow regulator of C, of this
this last regulator absorbs the disturbances of the feeding pressure that do not
theywillsignificantlytransmittothetemperature.
The level of tank 1, since entry A is unmanageable, must be regulated with the
output D. Note that, although A were zero, output D would not be stably null due to
to the recirculation flow and therefore, the heat exchanger would not be empty.Aconsequence
The secondary of this tie is that it modifies the output temperature, so if you want to
to maintain accurately, a feedforward correction must be incorporated to the flow of C for
compensate for these disturbances.
The level of tank 2 must also be regulated, but since there are no other manipulated variables left,
there is no other remedy than to establish an override control over the flow of B. Note that
here the important thing is to maintain the level above a minimum, since it must be protected
pumping equipment and overflow problems are not considered as such.
Temperature, level, and flow transmitters will be used to measure these variables.
conventional.The entire proposal can be seen in the figure:
FT FY
LC FC FT
LT
1
2 TT TC
B
FT
LT
FC LS LC Lmni