DISCUSS BOTH VIEW
KHÔNG NÊU OPINION
MB : Many pepple believe that …View1…, whereas others believe that …
View2… This essay will examine both views.
TB :
One the one hand, some people believe that …View 1 …
Firstly, lí do 1
Secondly, lí do 2
Thirdly, lí do 3
On the other hand, others believe that …View 2 … because of the following
reasons.
Firstly, lí do 1
Secondly, lí do 2
Thirdly, lí do 3
KB : In conclusion, it seems evident that both views have their own unique
advantages
NÊU OPINION
MB: Many people believe that ...VIEW 1..., whereas others believe that...VIEW 2
( đồng ý) ... Both viewpoints are justifiable, but I lean towards the latter the
former.
BODY 1:
On the one hand, some people believe that ...VIEW EM KHÔNG ỦNG HỘ...
+Firstly, ....nêu reason 1...
+Secondly/At the second point,.... nêu reason 2.....
BODY 2:
On the other hand, I do believe that...VIEW EM ỦNG HỘ...
+First and foremost, the key rationale in favor of this view is that ... reason 1...
+Secondly/At the second point, ...reason 2...
+Thirdly, it is sensible that ... reason 3...
KB: To sum up, although both views have some validity, it seems to me
that ...VIEW EM ỦNG HỘ...
EX1: Some people believe more actions can be taken to prevent crime, while others think
that little can be done.
Discuss both sides and give your own opinion.
Many concerned parties today feel that crime has already been reduced as much as is
realistically possible. While I agree this may be true in nations where security is prioritized over
privacy rights, there is still tremendous progress that can be made globally.
Those who argue crime no longer needs addressing point to technological innovations.
This situation is most apparent in authoritarian nations. Security surveillance can include the use
of street cameras, digital tracking, and eavesdropping on private communications. For instance,
in South Korea the crime rate in most urban areas is negligible and the average person reports
little anxiety about possible criminality, in contrast to periods in the past when there were more
instances of robbery, assault, theft, pickpocketing, and so on. These technological shifts have
greatly aided law enforcement in prosecuting criminals thereby also increasing the deterrence of
potential offenses.
However, crime still exists and can be countered by addressing the deeper, societal roots.
The main cause of all crime is poverty. When individuals earn a wage sufficient to maintain a
decent standard of living, the entire motive for most crimes disappears. The evidence for this is
that in wealthy countries where there is a relatively even distribution of wealth, the crime rates
are low and the police do not require draconian punishment or surveillance techniques. Beyond
income, it is also possible to invest in improving mental health. Many people today spend too
much time online and are vulnerable to extremist views. A still significant proportion of crimes
could be eliminated by encouraging people to spend more time outdoors in their community.
In conclusion, though technology has reduced certain kinds of criminality greatly, it is
still possible to lower crime rates by embracing a holistic, societal approach. The complete
eradication of crime is likely impossible and therefore there will always be a need to make
progress.
TEST: The subjects that children are taught at schools are decided by central
authorities. Some people say that teachers, not politicians, should be
responsible for this task. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this
opinion?
It is true that the subjects that children are taught at schools are decided by
central authorities. Some people say that teachers, not politicians, should be
responsible for this task. While this seems logical, I completely disagree with this
point of view.
On the one hand, some people agree with this point of view because of the
following reasons. The first reason is that teachers interact directly with students.
They know the strengths and weaknesses of their students.
( nêu lí do )
The second reason is that teachers have the educational skills to teach students.
( nêu lí do )
On the other hand, I disagree with this point of view because of the
following reasons. The first reason is that politicians have enough resources.
( nêu lí do )
.The second reason is that politicians have a better understanding of their country's
economic and social status. They know the directions.
( nêu lí do )
To sum up, strongly disagree with this point of view.
