Combined

Page-133:
The first bar chart displays the export earnings of five categories
in a particular nation for the years 2015 and 2016. The second
table provides information about the percentage change in the
value of each product between 2015 and 2016.

It is clear that the majority of export earnings came from

petroleum products and engineered goods, while the lowest
level was from textiles. As for the ratio of product values, it can
be seen that textiles had a significant increase. Moreover, gems
and jewellery was the only category that saw a decline.

Looking at the information in more detail, in 2015, the highest

value of export earnings was found in petroleum products at
nearly 61 billion, followed by engineered goods at around 57
billion. It is notable that the values for agricultural products were
similar in 2016, with approximately 31 billion and 32 billion,
respectively.

Moving on to the second table, compared to 2015, the

percentage value of textiles rose by 15.25% in 2016, which was
higher than other items during the given period. Additionally,
gems and jewellery was the only category that decreased, by
5.18%... . (Band 8)

The bar chart below illustrates the billion dollars of a nation’s

exports in five different product categories in 2015 and 2016.
What’s more, there is a table that exhibits the accurate
percentage change in each category of exports compared with
the value in 2016 and 2015.

Overall, it is apparent that from 2015 to 2016, “gems and

jewellery” was the only one that witnessed a decline, the export
earnings of other categories all rose, while textiles increased the
largest percentage.
The top two exports, which were petroleum products and
engineered goods, had similar sales volumes. In the given two
years, petroleum products increased slightly by 3% from about
60 to 62 billion dollars. Engineered goods increased by a larger
percentage of eight and a half per cent, from roughly 58 to just
over 60 billion dollars of export earnings.

The other three categories had much lower export values. There
was even a five per cent decrease in Gems and jewellery.
Agricultural products witnessed a close similarity in those two
years, increasing by approximately one per cent. However, the
earnings in textiles ascended by the highest percentage, with
15.24%........... (Band 7.5)

Page-129:
The provided bar chart illustrates the average rainfall in one
month while the graph depicts the average temperature in one
territory in East Africa.

Overall, both the temperature and the precipitation in this region

are higher during spring and autumn while they are significantly
lower in the summer and winter months. The greatest amount of
rain is achieved in April.

According to the graph, the temperature in East Africa fluctuates

throughout the year. Interestingly, summer is the coldest over
the time period with a low of approximately 20.5 degrees.
Generally, the heat remains quite steady since it stays between
20 and 24 degrees all year.

The amount of downpour experienced in this region also

changes during the year. It reaches its peak of 280 millimetres in
April and a low in July. Because the rainfall stays under 50
millimetres in winter and summer, these are the dryest periods

Стр. 2
in East Africa.....(Band 8)
The bar chart gives information about the average monthly
precipitation, while the line graph illustrates the temperature in
an area of East Africa.

Overall, the temperature in March is the highest point during the

year, the opposite is true for July. In addition, the average rainfall
in April accounts for the largest amount over the year.

As can be seen from the chart, the average precipitation in the

two first months is relatively low, just around 25mm, which is
followed by a significant increase to reach a peak at
approximately 280mm in April. The weather tends to be drier in
the following months as the average rainfall reaches the bottom
at about 10 mm in July. There is a slight increase before
experiencing a rise to exactly 150 mm in October and November.
Finally, the number of rainfall decreased to 50 mm in the last
month.

In terms of temperature, there is a significant increase from 22

degrees in January to a peak at roughly 28 degrees in March,
followed by a dramatic decline to reach the lowest point of 18
degrees in July. Three months later, temperature witnesses a
considerable rise to above 25 degrees before decreasing to
about 21 degrees in the final month...... (Band 8)

The combination of bar chart and line graph illustrates the

average rainfall and temperature monthly for a region in East
Africa.

To begin with, rainfall in January started off short of around 20

millimetres and decreased slightly more in February. Then, the
average rate rises dramatically in March and April to the highest
average in the year of 270 millimetres. Furthermore, the rate of
rainfall fluctuated between the months of May and December

Стр. 3
and ended up at 19.5 millimetres.

On the other hand, the temperature begins with a shocking

number of 22 degrees in January. Afterwards, the temperature
increases to its peak of 23 degrees in March and drops
significantly to its lowest of 20.5 degrees in July. Moreover, the
temperature varies from May to December and ended up at 19.5
degrees Celsius.

In conclusion, both the amount of rainfall and temperature

correlate to each other throughout the entire year and have the
number between March and April, while the lowest average is in
July......(Band 7.5)

Page-79:
The provided line graph depicts the number of visitors who
came to the UK and the number of British people who travelled
abroad between 1979 and 1999, while the horizontal bar chart
illustrates 5 frequently visited nations by the British general
public during 1999, measured in million visitors.

Overall, it can be observed that there was an increase in both

visitors to the UK and overseas British visitors throughout the
timeframe. Additionally, France and Spain were the top visiting
nations in 1999.

Initially concentrating on the recorded number of visitors to the

UK, commencing with precisely 10 million visitors in 1979, this
trend followed a slight growth to just over 10 million visitors in
1984 prior to gradually increasing to roughly under 20 million
visitors at the end of the period. In terms of British travellers
who visited foreign countries, figures for this start at around 12
million visitors, this was remarkably noticed that there was a
rise to literally 20 million visitors in 1984 and this tendency
considerably rose to over 50 million visitors in the next two

Стр. 4
decades.

With regards to the top 5 most commonly travelled nations by

UK residents in 1999, France experienced the highest number of
visitors at approximately 12 million. This was chased up by
Spain, where about 9 million visitors were witnessed in that
country. The remaining nations namely the USA, Greece and
Turkey also showed a significant number of visitors at 4 million,
3.5 million and 3 million, respectively..... (Band 8)

The line graph illustrates the number of visitors that went

abroad from the UK and visits to the UK by foreign residents in
two decades from 1979 to 1999, whereas the bar chart
represents which countries UK residents chose to visit more
often in 1999. Units are measured in millions of people.

Overall, the number of visits from the UK rose dramatically and

almost pentadrupled over the period given, while visits to the UK
increased gradually over two decades. In 1999, the most popular
country to visit by the UK residents was France.

Regarding the line graph, the number of visits abroad by UK

residents was roughly 12 million in 1979 and increased steadily
to 20 million visits in 1985 and following that, it climbed speedily
to over 50 million in 1999. At the same time, visits to the UK by
overseas residents moved upward more slowly. It began at
around 10 million visits in 1979 and then culminated at
approximately 25 million in 1999.

In terms of the most popular countries visited by UK residents in

1999, both France and Spain accounted for just over 10 million
and just under 10 million visitors respectively. The reverse is
seen in the USA, Greece, and Turkey as they received just below
5 million visitors each. While the USA accounted for nearly 4
million visits , Turkey had about 2.5 million......(Band 7.5)

Стр. 5
Pie Chart:
Page-57:
The given pie charts compare data about generating power from
5 various resources namely, fossil fuels, hydro, and nuclear in
Australia and France at 2 points in time, 1980 and 2000.

Overall, it was important that the amount of Coal and

Hydropower in Australia, which did not have Nuclear power , Oil
and Nuclear power in France increased over the period of 2
decades.

According to the diagram, in Australia, the total energy that was

produced climbed from 100 units in 1980 to 170 Unite in 2000.
In addition, the usage of resources like Natural gas and Oil
reduced from respectively 20 and 10 in 1980 to the same
number as 2 in 2000. Coal, the main source of electricity at both
times, composed 50 in the beginning; thereafter, it climbed to
130 in 2000; additionally, hydropower constituted 20 in 1980;
then it rose to 36 in 2000.

The graphs demonstrate that France's total production like

Australia climbed from 90 units in 1980 to 180 units in 2000.
Furthermore, France was the same as Australia the score of
Natural gas declined from 25 in 1980 to 2 in 1990. Hydro power
made up 5 in 1980 and after that, it decreased to the same
number as gas. coal score stabilized at 25, yet Nuclear and Oil
climbed from 15 and 20 at the start, to 126 and 25 in
2000.....(Band 8)

The pie charts illustrate how much electricity was produced by

different fuel sources in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000.

Overall, it can be seen that in Australia, the majority of electricity

was generated from coal whereas coal and natural gas were the
main sources of electricity in France.

Стр. 6
To begin with, in 1980, Australia produced 100 units of electricity
and half of this electricity was generated from coal sources.
However, in 2000, the total production of electricity increased to
170 units with 130 units of this total number belonging to coal
sources. Oil and natural gas only generated 2 units which were
considerably lower than that of 1980, with 10 and 20 units,
respectively. Besides, nuclear power was not introduced in
Australia during those years.

Shifting to France, it is apparent that the total production

doubled from 90 units in 1980 to 180 units in 2000. The most
obvious change was the dramatic growth in the production of
electricity from nuclear power sources, which jumped from 15
units in 1980 to 126 units in 2000. In addition to this, despite the
noticeable fall in the usage of hydropower and natural gas
sources, the units of electricity generated by oil and coal
remained constant, with 25 units in both 1980 and 2000.....(Band
8)

The pie charts illustrate quantities of electricity generated by

different fuel sources in different two countries in two respective
years: 1980 and 2000. Looking at an overall perspective, it is
readily apparent that there was no use of Nuclear Power to
make electricity in Australia, unlike France.

Starting with Australia, the use with the greatest number of fuel
is Coal in both years, with each making up 50 units and 130 units
of total production. It was followed by Natural Gas and Hydro
Power having the same figures of 20 units, which was double
that of Oil in 1980. Additionally, the second largest fuel source in
2000 was Hydro Power, which was almost a quarter of the
amount produced by Coal. Furthermore, the Natural Gas and Oil
in 2000, which consumption is the least, had carried only 2 units.

Стр. 7
For France, Coal and Natural Gas, which were the largest
sources stood at 25 units in the late 1900s. In 2000, Nuclear
Power was the largest electricity output by fuel source There
was an eightfold increase in the consumption of Nuclear fuel
from 15 units in 1990 to 126 units in 2000. A relatively low figure
was observed in Hydro Power with their consumption remaining
at only 5 units and 2 units respectively in 1980 and
2000.....(Band 8)

Page-60:
The pie charts illustrate the major causes of Immigration and
Emigration of people in the UK in 2007.

Overall, the per cent of immigrants and emigrants in the United

Kingdom working in particular sectors is the highest. The
reason for the least amount of people immigrating is not stated .
On the other hand, a mere 4% emigrate to other countries for
formal studies.

Furthermore, the migration to and from the UK due to specific

jobs is observed to be at a difference of just 1% with immigrants
in 2007 and a per cent less, in the case of residents moving
away from Great Britain. 26% of the immigrants stated that they
moved to the UK to pursue their education in comparison, to
22% of residents who were looking for job opportunities, outside
of England, which were found to be the second major cause of
migration in the United Kingdom.

Subsequently, It was noted that only 6% did not state their

purpose for immigration which was minimal in number. The
statistics for people accompanying others in migrating showed
a variation of about 3% between the former and the
latter.....(Band 9)

The pie charts clearly illustrate why people migrate from and to

Стр. 8
the United Kingdom. The data were gathered in 2007.

Overall, finding a proper job was the highest ratio in immigration

and emigration, however, according to the immigrating people,
there was no reason stated saw the lowest percentage.
Additionally, moving for formal study experienced the least in
the given data.

To begin with, definite job opportunities were a popular reason

for the immigrants and the emigrants averaged 29,5 % of the
total amount. The second cause was a formal study just 4%
lower than a suitable job for the immigrants whereas seeking a
job was the second one with 22% of the emigrants.

No reason stated had the lowest percentage for moving to the

UK, however, leaving from the UK for the same reason had three
times more than moving to the UK with 18%. Additionally, this
amount was the third highest amount for emigration among all
reasons. Accompany was another reason for immigration and
emigration with 15% and 13% of the total amount
respectively....(Band 7.5)

The pie charts compare the proportion of main reasons for

relocating people from/to Britain Raya in 2007. It was divided
into two reasons, immigration and emigration followed by the
detailed categories involving a definite job, searching for work,
continuing study, joining a new family member, no reason, and
others. Overall, there were different reasons for leaving and
joining the UK with the most popular reason people conducted
immigrate or emigrate was definite jobs.

To begin with, the result of a survey about the main reason

people immigrate was definite jobs with 30% followed by joint
formal study at 26%, accompanied by the member family was in
third place with 15%. Continued by other reasons and look for

Стр. 9
work at 12%, and 11%, respectively. The lowest percentage at 6%
with no information reason.

Moreover, the first reason people conducted emigration was job

permanence with 29%. The second reason for leaving was to
look for an opportunity to work the result of the survey was
around 22%, then people chose to answer “not respond stated”
at 18%, followed by other reasons at 13%. Lastly, people choose
to stay studying in the UK rather than go abroad with a
percentage around 4%.....(Band 7.5)

Table:
Page-68:
The provided table depicts the share of income families spend
their money in five countries in Europe.

Overall, the biggest percentage of money goes towards food and

drink and housing in all countries while clothing is bought the
least. People living in France, Germany, and the UK put most of
their financial resources into housing whereas those from
Turkey and Spain spend the largest share of income on food and
drinks.

According to the data, France, Germany, and the UK spend the

biggest amount of money on housing with 31, 33 and 37%,
respectively. They have a common trend of spending less money
on clothing out of all categories with citizens of France
achieving only a mere 7%.

Returning to the remaining countries, both Turkey and Spain

used a bit more than a third of their monthly salary on food and
drinks; therefore, promoting this category as their biggest
expenditure. Although the resources spent on housing were
similar at around 20% of the income, people in Spain used 5%
more for entertainment....(Band 9)

Стр. 10
The table given provides a comparison of domestic wages every
month, which citizens in five Europe pay for various fundamental
requirements.

Looking from an overall perspective, it is evident that residents

in all regions in Europe allocate a major part of their income to
Food & Drink and Housing and significantly less to the other
categories.

In terms of food and drink, the proportion of income which

people in Turkey spend on this category is the highest, at 36%.
The figures for Spain and the UK are lower, at 31% and 27%,
respectively, compared to 25% in France. However, Germany
accounts for the lowest value, at 22%.

The percentage of total household wages (which are) allocated

for housing by inhabitants in France and Germany are 31% and
33%, in the given order, while those in the UK are slightly higher,
at 37%. The figures for Turkey and Spain are 20% and 18%, in
their respective order. With regards to clothing, the expenditure
on this section in Germany makes up 15%. 15% of the total
salary is spent on this section by dwellers in Germany, which is
higher than that of Turkey, at 12%, followed by 11% in the UK and
8% in Spain. However, the data on France is half as much as that
of Germany, at 7%. The average percentage of income which
inhabitants in these countries spend on entertainment only
ranges from 10% to 19%.......(Band 8)

The table provides information about the percentage of

household monthly earnings in European countries - France,
Germany, the UK, Turkey, and Spain - allocated to different
categories.

Overall, it is evident that the biggest proportion of expenses was

housing in France, Germany, and the UK, whereas this pattern for
Turkey and Spain was food and drink.

Стр. 11
Looking in more detail, the higher spending rates in France were
housing, and food and drink at 31%, and 25%, respectively, while
this figure for entertainment accounted for 2 times much than
clothing. Likewise, the proportion rate for housing was 33% in
Germany, and other categories comprised 15-22%. Unlike
Germany and France, people consume more food and drink
which comprised 31% of the total allocation rate in Spain. The
smallest percentage of clothing can be seen in Spain, at 8%, the
housing and entertainment rates accounted for around 15% and
18%, respectively.

Regarding the remaining countries, the largest percentage of

housing take up in the UK at 37% as opposed to the other cities,
though this figure for Turkey was around 20%. Another of the
highest stats was observed in Turkey in terms of the food and
drink at 36%......(Band 7.5)

Page-66:
The chart provides information on metro systems in main cities
across the world, with the number of travellers, how far for
routes, and the opening date;where the cities mentioned are
London,Paris, Tokyo, DC, Kyoto, and Los Angeles.

Overall, one noticeable feature of the data is that the population

of Tokyo travellers using the railway experiences the highest,
standing at 1927 million a year, followed by Paris and London.
On the other hand, the public's amount using this kind of vehicle
is the lowest for Kyoto and Los Angeles,with DC's number
displaying slightly higher.

It is obvious that the busiest city that individuals use this public
transport is Tokyo,followed by Paris and London accounting for
1,191 and 775 million a year respectively. On the contrary, the
figures for Kyoto and Los Angeles are the two lowest, not over
50 million commuters a year and the record of kilometres

Стр. 12
commuting aligns with the traveller population,presenting the
shortest route compared to other main cities. As far as the date
opened is concerned, all of them reveal a similar pattern of
working days,with the range between almost 1,900 to just a bit
over 2,000 dates......(Band 9)

The table provides information on underground railway systems

in six significant cities, detailing the year each system was
inaugurated, the total length of their routes in kilometres, and the
annual number of passengers in millions.

London's underground system, being the oldest, opened in 1863

and boasts the longest route at 394 kilometres. Despite its
extensive network, it only ranks third in terms of passenger
numbers, with 775 million users per year. On the other hand,
Tokyo, which opened in 1927, has the highest number of
passengers annually at 1928 million, despite having a shorter
route length of 155 kilometres.

Paris, opened in 1900, has a route length of 199 kilometres and

serves 1191 million passengers annually, making it second in
passenger usage. Meanwhile, newer systems like Washington
DC, Kyoto, and Los Angeles have significantly smaller route
lengths and passenger numbers. For instance, Kyoto, with just
11 kilometres of route, caters to 45 million passengers per year,
while Los Angeles, with 28 kilometres, serves 50 million annually.

Overall, older and more extensive underground systems tend to

have higher passenger numbers, although exceptions like Tokyo
highlight that efficiency and population density can also
significantly influence ridership..... (Band 7.5)

The graph depicts data concerning underground railway

systems including three categories(date opened, kilometers of
route, and annual passengers) in six big cities(London, Paris,
Tokyo, Washington DC, Kyoto, and Los Angeles).

Стр. 13
Overall, it is remarkable that the railway of London opened the
earliest, thus it ran the longest kilomerters of route. Moreover,
Tokyo holds the most number of passengers annually.

In terms of London, Paris and Tokyo, the length of the route was
between over 150 and nearly 400, especially London had the
longest distance at 394. Additionally, in Tokyo, its passengers
arrived at approximately 1928 million every year, which was the
largest volume of all.

With regard to the other three lately opened railway

cities(Washington DC, Kyoto, and Los Angeles), Washington
DC's gross kilometers ranked first at 126, while Los Angeles and
Kyoto at 28 and 11 respectively. Except the Washington DC
which owned over 100 million persons yearly, both Kyoto and
Los Angeles were around 50 million.....(Band 7)

Page-48:
The provided bar chart gives data on various kinds of transport
utilized to commute to and from work in a particular European
city in 1960, 1980 and 2000. It is measured in percentages of
travellers.

Overall, the popularity of commuting by car between work and

home showed a dramatic growth throughout the decades. On
the other hand, the percentage of people utilizing bikes and
going to work by foot, decreased significantly throughout a 40-
year period, whereas taking a bus was one of the most
convenient choices to get to work.

It can be clearly seen that the percentage of workers driving to

work rose dramatically from about 5% in 1960 to around 22% in
1980 and then again to approximately 35% by 2000. The
percentage of individuals taking a bus fluctuated throughout a

Стр. 14
given period from around 17% to 25% and 16% in 1960, 1980 and
2000 respectively.

In stark contrast, the percentage of people biking dropped

dramatically from approximately 25% to 20% and again to 5% in
1960, 1980 and 2000 respectively, the statistic of which
coincides with the number of workers going to and from work on
foot.....(Band 8)

The bar chart illustrates the four types of transportation

methods used by the European town in three years 1960, 1980,
and 2000.

Overall, it can be seen from the graph cars were the most
popular vehicles used by people as compared to all types of
modes and increased year by year. The trend of walking and
biking methods declined every year. The public transport (bus)
showed fluctuations over the period of 40 years.

It is conspicuous that people used to walk in 1960 were 34%,

which plunged to nearly 8% in 2000. The population used to
travel by bike in 1960 was 26% , which fell to 20% and 6% in
respective years 1980 and 2000.

Probing ahead, public transportation (bus) was slightly 17% in

1960, which skyrocketed to 26% in 1980 after that it dropped
significantly to 16% in 2000. In addition, it can be experienced
car users were 6% in 1960, further, it grew to 23% in 1980 then
peaked at 35% in 2000. .... (Band 9)

The given chart illustrates four types of transportation between

1960 and 2000 that citizens commuted to work and travel in a
European city.

From an overall perspective, it is evident that the percentage of

Стр. 15
car drivers experienced an upward trend, whereas a reverse
pattern could be seen in the figures of bike and foot over the
surveyed period.

It is clear that the proportion of cars in 1960 was the lowest, at

5% of total travellers. The data in 1980 was higher, with around
27%. However, the number of cars in 2000 accounted for the
largest, at about 36%.

During this time frame, there was a consistent fall-off in the

number of residents who went to work by bike and on foot to
nearly 5% and 10%, respectively. In terms of buses, a European
city witnessed a fluctuating increase in the number of bus users,
reaching a peak of approximately 25% before plummeting to
somewhere in the vicinity of 15% at the end year shown.....(Band
9)

Page-42:
The bar chart illustrates the average daily time spent by men and
women on six different household chores in Great Britain.

Overall, women dedicate considerably more time to household

chores compared to men, particularly for tasks within the home,
while men are more engaged in outdoor and less routine duties.
Specifically, women spend significantly more time on activities
such as cooking, washing up, cleaning, and childcare, whereas
men allocate most of their time to gardening, pet care, and
maintenance tasks.

In detail, women lead substantially in kitchen-related activities,

devoting an average of 74 minutes per day to cooking, baking,
and washing up, more than double the time spent by men. This
trend continues with cleaning and tidying, where women invest
58 minutes daily, compared to a mere 13 minutes by men.
Childcare is another domain where women are the primary
contributors, spending 45 minutes per day, over twice the male

Стр. 16
contribution.

Conversely, men surpass women in tasks such as gardening and

pet care, dedicating nearly 50 minutes per day, which is more
than double the time women spend on these activities. Similarly,
for maintenance and odd jobs, men allocate 26 minutes per day,
nearly triple the time women invest.

In summary, the distribution of household chores in Great Britain

reveals a clear gender disparity, with women predominantly
undertaking indoor tasks and men focusing on outdoor and
occasional tasks...... (Band 8.5)

The bar chart illustrates average time spend by each gender

performing 6 different household chores in Great Britain.

In brief, women spend more time on domestic chores than men.

Specifically males are more active on duties located around the
home while women do more inside the home.

Overall, female work significantly more than men on works like

cooking, washing, cleaning and child nurturing while men spend
their majority of time on works like gardening, pet caring and
odd jobs.

Delving into specifics, females lead substantially in the kitchen,

dedicating an average of 74 minutes per day to cooking, baking,
and washing up, more than double the time spent by males. This
trend of female dominance continues with cleaning and house
tidying, where females invest 58 minutes daily, compared to just
13 minutes by their male counterparts. Childcare is another area
where females are the primary contributors, spending 45
minutes per day, which is more than double the male
contribution.

Стр. 17
In contrast, the division of household tasks by gender in Great
Britain shifts as we consider outdoor and less routine tasks.
Males dedicate nearly 50 minutes to gardening and pet care,
surpassing females by a significant margin of more than 100%.
Similarly, when it comes to maintenance and odd jobs, males
allocate more time, with a notable 26 minutes per day, which is
nearly triple the time spend by women......(Band 7.5)

Line Graph:
Page-28:
The line graph illustrates the rates of recycling of four particular
materials in one country between 1982 and 2010.

Overall, it can be seen that paper&cardboard was the number-

one category on the list during the whole period, while plastics
was the least well-known. Another interesting change is that all
materials saw an upward trend.

Looking at the details, paper&cardboard started at 65%, after

which it showed a slight fluctuation of 5%. Having increased
significantly to 80%, it witnessed a gradual decline to 70.
Likewise, glass containers, despite falling considerably to 40%, it
saw a small growth to 50%, and then to 60%.

Regarding the other materials, aluminium cans began at 5%,

after which by 1998, it grew gradually to 20%, then it continued
its upward trend, and reached a peak at 45% by 2010.
Additionally, plastics saw a marginal rise of 5%, from 3% to 8%,
making it the least famous material for use.....(Band 8)

The chart displays the percentage of recycled materials in a

certain country between 1982 and 2010.

Overall, it is clear that paper and cardboard remained the most

Стр. 18
recyclable during the years, on the contrary, plastic had the
lowest percentage over the period. Aluminium started rising
significantly and kept the pace till the end, glass recycling was
decreasing at the beginning, but rose steadily after that.

At the start of 1982, there were only two fractions with a

considerable recycling rate. For the first 10 years the paper
graph has been fluctuating a bit, but immediately reached its
peak of 80% in 1994, then had a 10 per cent downturn, losing
about a quarter every 4 years. Glass has the opposite statistic. In
the beginning, exactly half of all glass was recycled, the chart
went down and had the lowest point of approximately 40%, then
started to grow and climbed to the highest point in 2010.

The current country started to recycle aluminium cans a bit later,

despite that this material has grown 9 times, showing a
dramatical jump of a bit less than half from 2002 to 2010. The
graph for plastics also was rising but never met even a 10%
score.....(Band 8)

Page-30:
The line graph below depicts six energy sources consumed in
the US from 1980 to 2030 (Petrol and Oil, Coal, Natural Gas,
Nuclear, Solar/Wind and Hydropower). Units are measured in
quadrillion.

Overall, it can be seen that the consumption of Petrol and Oil,

Coal, Nuclear and Solar/Wind gradually increased during the
given period. However, the Natural Gas and Hydropower showed
a fluctuation from 1990 to around 2013.

With regards to the usage of Petrol and Oil, it began at 35

quadrillion and then experienced a drop and grew until the year
1995. Afterwards, it climbed steadily and is predicted to reach
approximately 50 quadrillion in 2030. Similarly, the utilization of
Coal showed an increasing tendency from 1995 and is

Стр. 19
estimated to reach its peak at nearly 30 quadrillion in 2030.

On the other hand, in terms of the Natural Gas and Hydropower,

both of them represented a minor oscillation from 1980 to about
2015, followed by a significantly stable status until 2030. Finally,
the Nuclear and Solar/Wind showed a gradually increasing trend
and are expected to rise further by 2030.....(Band 8)

The given line graph illustrates the USA energy resource data
from 1980 and forecasts for 2030.

Overall, there were upward trends in the consumption of all

sources over 30 years. Fossil fuels exhibited the highest
consumption amount, whereas the opposite can be seen in
renewable ones.

Regarding nonrenewable sources, in 1980, standing at 35

quadrillion units, the highest volume belonged to petro and oil,
followed by natural gas and coal with 20 and nearly 16,
respectively. After fluctuating over the next 15 years, this figure
significantly increased to 42 quadrillion units and was expected
to rise continuously to 47 in 2030. Natural gas and coal showed
erratic patterns from 1980 to 2015; coal is projected to grow to
30 quadrillion units, while natural gas will stabilize.

Referring to environmentally friendly power, nuclear, solar/wind,

and hydropower shared the same level in 1980, at 4 quadrillion -
just one-seventh compared with petroleum and oil. These
figures for nuclear and solar/wind moderately grew and were
forecasted to reach 8 and 6 quadrillion units in 2030,
respectively. The quantity of hydropower generated was uneven
over three decades and will continue at this level until
2030......(Band 8.5)

Стр. 20
Process Diagram:
Page-136:
The diagram illustrates the process of production of sugar from
sugar cane. In recent years sugar has become the important
product that each family has and it is known as wight gold.

First of all, after planting sugar cane and waiting for it to grow
for nearly one to two years, then farmers start harvesting them
either by using manual tools or by tillage. After that, workers use
a crashing machine in order to extract juice from sugar cane.

Following that, the next step is purifying juice, which workers use
a filter made of limestone, the juice is placed under heat in an
evaporator, so juice becomes as syrupy. The syrup is placed in a
centrifuge in order to separate out sugar crystals and water;
however, before the sugar crystals are packaged, they are set
aside to dry and cool.

To sum up, the manufacturing process of sugar has a 7-stage,

man-made and linear process. It begins with sugar cane
cultivation and ends with dried and cooled sugar crystals....
(Band 7)

The diagram illustrates how the sugarcanes are used to produce

sugar .

Overall, this manufacturing process involves 7 - steps beginning

with cropping the sugarcanes followed by crushing them to
make syrup. Finally, the syrup turned out as sugar crystals.

Firstly, the crops of sugarcanes are cultivated for around 12- 18

months through which sugarcanes become tall enough for the
harvesting process. In this process, farmers usually cut the long
sugarcanes manually from their lower section leaving the roots
as such or it can be done by harvesting machines which cut
canes in large quantities. In the third step, a machine is used to

Стр. 21
crush sugarcanes into juice which is further collected into a
huge tub.

Subsequently, a purification process is required to filter out juice

which is done by a limestone filter. In the next step, filtered juice
is poured into a massive container. A burner is used to heat this
container so that a syrup is formed in the evaporator.
Furthermore, sugar crystals are separated from syrup by
centrifugation . In the final step, crystals are collected into a big
tub to follow the procedure of drying and cooling of sugar.....
(Band 7)

Page-74:
This diagram depicts the honey bee’s life cycle. Overall, it can be
seen that the female of the bee must undergo 6 stages to reach
maturity.

According to what is shown, firstly, eggs are laid by females,

which occur every three days. Then, the process takes from 9 to
10 days until the eggs hatch. After that Nymph moults appear,
and the phases of their growth have to pass through three
different periods of time, 5, 7,and 9 days respectively.

Regarding young adults, it can be watched directly after the full

development of the Nymph moult. Subsequently, the maturity
stage, before it reaches it, four days have to pass.

To sum up, we could say that the total duration of the life cycle
ranges from 34 to 36 days. Despite this, most of this time is
consumed during the evolution steps of the Nymph moults,
which total around 21 days, whereas the process of laying eggs
takes the least period of time, as it happens every 3 days.
(Band 8)

Стр. 22
The chart illustrates the life cycle of a honey bee.

Overall, it can be seen from the diagram the honey bee’s life
cycle undergoes six different stages starting from laying the
eggs until becoming an adult bee, this process takes nearly
more than a month.

It is conspicuous that the first stage where a matured honey bee

lays one or two eggs every three days and then the eggs take
240 hours to hatch. In the next five days, these small bee’s
children have no ferns until they reach the next seven days.
Additionally, in the next seven days, the size of the bee started to
increase and the fern started to grow in the next nine days, it
became three times bigger size from its original size and is
called a nymph.

Probing ahead, after completing nine days, the nymph

transformed into a young adult. Furthermore, the young adult
becomes a mature honey bee in the next four days and after
that, the cycle starts again and again.....(Band 7)

Map:
Page-115:
The maps illustrate the change of a school in 2004 and how to
renovate it in 2034.

Overall, it is clear that the number of students will increase in 30

years, so there is a new school building which will be
constructed.

To begin with, there was a path connecting the main entrance

and the sports field; however, the connecting road will be built
from the first school building to the second school building, so a
part of the sidewalk will be removed. In addition, the sports field
will be changed to the third school building, and the second car

Стр. 23
park will be built on the east of it. This change leads some trees
to be knocked down.

Moreover, there will be a road connecting the main entrance and

the second car park which will be constructed behind the second
school building in 2034. Therefore, the sports field will become
smaller and be removed to the southern of the second parking
lot. On the west of the map, the road, first parking lot and main
entrance have been located in the same place until 2034....(Band
8)

The given map illustrates the layout of an educational institution

in 2004 and the projected plan to change the site in 2034.

Overall, it can be seen that the most remarkable proposed

feature of the school is the addition of one school building and a
car park. Accordingly, the number of students in this school is
also predicted to increase.

In 2004, the school was accessed by a road which directly led to

the car park and main entrance to the site. Regarding the interior
of the school, there were 2 school buildings which were divided
by a path leading to a sports field. To the east and south of this
educational site, it is surrounded by a lot of trees providing
shade for 600 students attending the school.

1000 students are forecasted to join this school in 2034. Certain

alterations will be made to the eastern part of the area.
Specifically, there will be one more car park which is entered via
a newly built road starting from the main one. School building 3
will replace the sports field which is projected to relocate to the
external part near the shrubbery area. Noticeably, the road to the
main entrance and the original car park will undergo no
change....(Band 8)

Стр. 24
Page-110:
The given maps illustrate changes that happened in the zone
which was in the West Park secondary school in 3 various
years( 1950, 1980, and 2010).

Overall, it was important that both vegetation areas and

residential places were destroyed while the population facilities
which added to this region.

According to the graphs, the position of the School, which was

next to the main road, was the same as the prior, but in 1980
and 2010 the main building was in this place. Next to the
institute were Houses in 1950; nevertheless, this district was
replaced by the car park and science block at other times.

The pictures demonstrate the playground, which was behind the

school, in both 1950 and 1980 was the same as each other, yet
in 2010, it separated two sides namely, the playground and
sports field. In addition, in 1950 behind accommodation was
farmland; then in 1980 it was altered into a sports field; although,
the car park, which was next to the science block in 1980, has
been developed; furthermore, it obtained a sports field for its
improvement.....(Band 8)

The map below presents the evolution that West Park Secondary
School has gone through since its construction in 1950
compared to thirty and sixty years later.

Overall, half of the school area remained almost unchanged.

However, the other half has significantly changed from 1950
until 2010.

On the half side of the perimeter, the facilities did not alter much.
The school building did not change. On the contrary, the
playground was reconstructed to be narrower and shared the
available room with the sports field in 2010.

Стр. 25
In the alternate section, there were major differences in 2010
compared to 1980 and 1950. The houses that were initially
present next to the school building were demolished and turned
into a car park and science block in 1980. Moreover, in the same
year, the farmland that was located near the houses underwent
reconstruction to be a sports field. While the science block
remained untouched in 2010, the car park was expanded until it
occupied the previously available area for the sports
field....(Band 8)

Стр. 26