Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to www.scribd.com

Scribd
Upload
24 views3 pages

Sample Evaluation Form

The document is an expert evaluation form designed to assess the safety practices and teaching skills of physical education teachers in relation to an intervention program. It includes a rating scale for evaluators to assess various criteria such as comprehensiveness, general appearance, and overall effectiveness of the survey instrument. Evaluators are required to provide their name, academic achievement, affiliation, and comments on the evaluation.

Uploaded by

Edwin Ryan Broma
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
24 views3 pages

Sample Evaluation Form

The document is an expert evaluation form designed to assess the safety practices and teaching skills of physical education teachers in relation to an intervention program. It includes a rating scale for evaluators to assess various criteria such as comprehensiveness, general appearance, and overall effectiveness of the survey instrument. Evaluators are required to provide their name, academic achievement, affiliation, and comments on the evaluation.

Uploaded by

Edwin Ryan Broma
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

EXPERT EVALUATION FORM

Evaluator’s Name: _________________

Highest Academic Achievement: ________

Affiliation/School: ______

Directions: Please assess the extent to which the study on the SAFETY PRACTICES
AND TEACHING SKILLS OF PHYSCAL EDUCATION TEACHERS TOWARDS AN
INTERVENTION PROGRAM put a check mark on the column that corresponds to your
assessment. The rating scale is explained below:

VERBAL
SCALE NARRATIVE INTERPRETATION
INTERPRETATION

This means that the survey instrument meets the


5 Fully
criteria outstandingly.

This means that the survey instrument meets the


4 Very Much
criteria satisfactorily.

This means that the survey instrument meets the


3 Much
criteria fair.

This means that the survey instrument does not meet


2 Not Much
much the criteria.

This means that the survey instrument does not meet


1 Not At All
the criteria.

EVALUATION OF THE INSTRUMENT:

CRITERIA EVALUATION

5 4 3 2 1
A. COMPREHENSIVENESS OF THE CONTENT
/
1. To what extent is the instrument comprehensive in terms of:

1.1. Relevance (Do the items in the questionnaire serve them


particular set of circumstances?

1.2. Balance (Does the questionnaire measure important


achievement in terms of objective?)

1.3. Efficiency (Does the questionnaire yield a large number of


independent variable storable responses for a unit of time?)

1.4. Objectively (Are the choices in the instrument able to yield


the same responses from suggested possible answer?)

1.5. Reliability (Are items in the instrument highly relevant and


well balanced?)

1.6. Fairness (Does the instrument emphasize knowledge,


understanding, and abilities?)

2. To what extent does the instrument help to carry up the


purpose of the study?

3. Others (Please specify)

B. GENERAL APPEARANCE

1. To what extent does the instrument show:

1.1. Attractiveness (refers to the quality that causes an


interest or desire)

1.2. Neatness (the desire for order and symmetry, and


generally considered to be desirable)

1.3. Presentation (showing and explaining the content of a


topic)

1.4. Others (Please specify)


COMMENTS:

Printed Name and Signature of Validator

Date: __ , 2024

You might also like