Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to www.scribd.com

Scribd
Upload
12 views2 pages

Research Form 2 Validation Form

The document is a validation sheet for evaluating quantitative research tools, focusing on criteria such as clarity, organization, suitability, and objectivity. Evaluators rate various aspects of the research instrument on a scale from 2 to 10. It also includes a section for comments and a certification from the validator confirming the validation process.

Uploaded by

maryjoys.belarma
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
12 views2 pages

Research Form 2 Validation Form

The document is a validation sheet for evaluating quantitative research tools, focusing on criteria such as clarity, organization, suitability, and objectivity. Evaluators rate various aspects of the research instrument on a scale from 2 to 10. It also includes a section for comments and a certification from the validator confirming the validation process.

Uploaded by

maryjoys.belarma
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

RESEARCH ASSESSMENT TOOL VALIDATION SHEET

FOR QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH


Name of Evaluator:
Degree
Position
Institution:

Name of
Researchers:
Title of Researcher
To the evaluator, please check the appropriate box for your ratings.
Points: 10 – Excellent; 8 – Very good; 6 – good; 4 – Fair; 2- Poor

Criteria/ Indicators 10 8 6 4 2
1 Clarity of directions and Items
The vocabulary, language structure and concepts suit the level of the
respondents, and the items are written in clear and understandable manner.
2 Presentation and Organization of items
The items are presented and organized in a logical manner.
3 Suitability of the items
The items are appropriate, and they represent the substance of the research. The
statements are designed to determine the conditions, knowledge, perceptions and/or the
attitudes that are supposed to be measured.
4 Adequateness
The items represent the coverage of the research adequately. The number of statements
per area is representative enough for the questions needed in the
Research.
5 Attainment of Purpose
The research tool fulfills the objectives for which it is constructed.
6 Objectivity
No aspect of the questionnaire suggests bias on the part of the researchers.
7 Relevance to Research Objectives
Each item directly align with the study objectives and hypothesis of the study.
8 Inclusivity
The language used in the construction of the instrument is free from
discriminatory or biased words or terms. The language use is fair and does not
promote stereotypes.
9 User Friendliness
The instrument includes clear, concise, and easy-to-follow instructions for
respondents.
10 Over-all Quality of Instruments

Comments/ Suggestions/ Recommendations:

SPCT Institutional Research and Publications Form


________________________________________________________________________

VALIDATOR’S CERTIFICATION
________________________________________________________________________

I hereby certify the Research Instrument for the manuscript titled,

(RESEARCH TITLE)

prepared by

RESEARCHERS NAME (Alphabetical)


(for more than 5 researchers, use 2 column format)

Has been validated by the undersigned according to the standards and rubrics provided for validation process.

_____________________________________
Signature over printed name of validator

Affiliation:

Date:

SPCT Institutional Research and Publications Form

You might also like